Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Vidhi Lalchand
dblp:137/4549
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 77% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 11% Deep learning architectures and training · 11% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process |
1.6 | 3 | 2022 | Sparse Gaussian Process Hyperparameters: Optimize or Integrate? · NeurIPS 2022 Marginalised Gaussian Processes with Nested Sampling · NeurIPS 2021 Kernel Identification Through Transformers · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Sparse Gaussian Process Hyperparameters: Optimize or Integrate? · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
sparse gaussian process |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Sparse Gaussian Process Hyperparameters: Optimize or Integrate? · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel selection |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Kernel Identification Through Transformers · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › sampling
nested sampling |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Marginalised Gaussian Processes with Nested Sampling · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Kernel Identification Through Transformers · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Sparse Gaussian Process Hyperparameters: Optimize or Integrate? · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variational inducing points · 0.6stochastic variational inference · 0.6markov chain monte carlo · 0.6transformer · 0.5self-attention · 0.5nested sampling · 0.5hamiltonian monte carlo · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Generalised GPLVM with Stochastic Variational InferenceabstractGaussian process latent variable models (GPLVM) are a flexible and non-linear approach to dimensionality reduction, extending classical Gaussian processes to an unsupervised learning context. The Bayesian incarnation of the GPLVM uses a variational framework, where the posterior over latent variables is approximated by a well-behaved variational family, a factorised Gaussian yielding a tractable lower bound. However, the non-factorisability of the lower bound prevents truly scalable inference. In this work, we study the doubly stochastic formulation of the Bayesian GPLVM model amenable with minibatch training. We show how this framework is compatible with different latent variable formulations and perform experiments to compare a suite of models. Further, we demonstrate how we can train in the presence of massively missing data and obtain high-fidelity reconstructions. We demonstrate the model’s performance by benchmarking against the canonical sparse GPLVM for high dimensional data examples. Vidhi Lalchand, Aditya Ravuri, Neil D. Lawrence |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2022 | Sparse Gaussian Process Hyperparameters: Optimize or Integrate?abstractThe kernel function and its hyperparameters are the central model selection choice in a Gaussian process (Rasmussen and Williams, 2006).Typically, the hyperparameters of the kernel are chosen by maximising the marginal likelihood, an approach known as Type-II maximum likelihood (ML-II). However, ML-II does not account for hyperparameter uncertainty, and it is well-known that this can lead to severely biased estimates and an underestimation of predictive uncertainty. While there are several works which employ fully Bayesian characterisation of GPs, relatively few propose such approaches for the sparse GPs paradigm. In this work we propose an algorithm for sparse Gaussian process regression which leverages MCMC to sample from the hyperparameter posterior within the variational inducing point framework of (Titsias, 2009). This work is closely related to (Hensman et al, 2015b) but side-steps the need to sample the inducing points, thereby significantly improving sampling efficiency in the Gaussian likelihood case. We compare this scheme against natural baselines in literature along with stochastic variational GPs (SVGPs) along with an extensive computational analysis. Vidhi Lalchand, Wessel P. Bruinsma, David R. Burt, Carl E. Rasmussen |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2021 | Kernel Identification Through TransformersabstractKernel selection plays a central role in determining the performance of Gaussian Process (GP) models, as the chosen kernel determines both the inductive biases and prior support of functions under the GP prior. This work addresses the challenge of constructing custom kernel functions for high-dimensional GP regression models. Drawing inspiration from recent progress in deep learning, we introduce a novel approach named KITT: Kernel Identification Through Transformers. KITT exploits a transformer-based architecture to generate kernel recommendations in under 0.1 seconds, which is several orders of magnitude faster than conventional kernel search algorithms. We train our model using synthetic data generated from priors over a vocabulary of known kernels. By exploiting the nature of the self-attention mechanism, KITT is able to process datasets with inputs of arbitrary dimension. We demonstrate that kernels chosen by KITT yield strong performance over a diverse collection of regression benchmarks. Fergus Simpson, Ian Davies, Vidhi Lalchand, Alessandro Vullo, Nicolas Durrande, Carl E. Rasmussen |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2021 | Marginalised Gaussian Processes with Nested SamplingabstractGaussian Process models are a rich distribution over functions with inductive biases controlled by a kernel function. Learning occurs through optimisation of the kernel hyperparameters using the marginal likelihood as the objective. This work proposes nested sampling as a means of marginalising kernel hyperparameters, because it is a technique that is well-suited to exploring complex, multi-modal distributions. We benchmark against Hamiltonian Monte Carlo on time-series and two-dimensional regression tasks, finding that a principled approach to quantifying hyperparameter uncertainty substantially improves the quality of prediction intervals. Fergus Simpson, Vidhi Lalchand, Carl E. Rasmussen |
NeurIPS | 2 |