Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Honglin Zhang

dblp:137/5337 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 56% Question answering and dialogue systems · 44%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › knowledge-intensive question answering
multi-document question answering
0.912025
MEBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Cross-Document Multi-Entity Question Answering · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › natural language understanding › question answering
multi-entity question answering
0.912025
MEBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Cross-Document Multi-Entity Question Answering · EMNLP 2025
Information retrieval
evaluation
0.912025
MEBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Cross-Document Multi-Entity Question Answering · EMNLP 2025
Information retrieval › question answering
question answering benchmark
0.912025
MEBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Cross-Document Multi-Entity Question Answering · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation
0.312025
MEBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Cross-Document Multi-Entity Question Answering · EMNLP 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

retrieval-augmented generation · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 MEBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Cross-Document Multi-Entity Question Answering
abstract
Cross-Document Multi-entity Question Answering (MEQA) demands the integration of scattered information across documents to resolve complex queries involving entities, relationships, and contextual dependencies.Although Large Language Models (LLMs) and Retrieval-augmented Generation (RAG) systems show promise, their performance on crossdocument MEQA remains underexplored due to the absence of tailored benchmarks.To address this gap, we introduce MEBench, a scalable multi-document, multi-entity benchmark designed to systematically evaluate LLMs' capacity to retrieve, consolidate, and reason over scattered and dense information.Our benchmark comprises 4,780 questions which are systematically categorized into three primary categories: Comparative Reasoning, Statistical Reasoning and Relational Reasoning, further divided into eight distinct types, ensuring broad coverage of real-world multi-entity reasoning scenarios.Our experiments on state-of-theart LLMs reveal critical limitations: even advanced models achieve only 59% accuracy on MEBench.Our benchmark emphasizes the importance of completeness and factual precision of information extraction in MEQA tasks, using Entity-Attributed F1 (EA-F1) metric for granular evaluation of entity-level correctness and attribution validity.MEBench not only highlights systemic weaknesses in current LLM frameworks but also provides a foundation for advancing robust, entity-aware QA architectures. 1
Teng Lin, Yuyu Luo, Honglin Zhang, Chunlin Liu, Kaishun Wu, Nan Tang 0001
EMNLP3
2024 Multi-Level AI-Driven Analysis of Software Repository Similarities
abstract
This paper introduces significant enhancements to RepoSim4Py and RepoSnipy, advanced semantic tools for deep analysis of software repositories. RepoSim4Py commandline toolbox now supports multi-level embedding, encompassing code, documentation, requirements, README, and comprehensive repository analysis, which enable the understanding of repository dynamics. Concurrently, RepoSnipy webbased search engine facilitates sophisticated repository similarity searches and introduces clustering based on both repository tags (topic_cluster) and code embeddings (code_cluster). We also introduce SimilarityCal, a novel binary classification model trained on these clusters, to predict and quantify repository similarities with high accuracy. These developments provide researchers and developers with powerful tools to navigate the complex landscape of software repositories, improving efficiency in software development and fostering innovation through better reuse of existing resources.
Honglin Zhang, Leyu Zhang, Lei Fang 0001, Rosa Filgueira
e-Science1
2021 T2FA: A Heuristic Algorithm for Deadline-Constrained Workflow Scheduling in Cloud with Multicore Resource
abstract
Workflow scheduling is one of the most challenging problems in cloud computing. This paper proposes a heuristic algorithm task type first algorithm (T2FA) for solving deadline-constrained workflow scheduling in cloud with multicore resource (DWS_CMR). The objectives to be minimized are the maximal completion time (i.e., makespan) and the total costs. Firstly, resource model and workflow application model are introduced. Resource model has the configurations of multicore, processing capacity, bandwidth and leasing price, and workflow application model is described by directed acyclic graph (DAG). Based on above models, the mathematical model of DWS_CMR is established, which allows multiple tasks to run concurrently on multicore resources. Secondly, to exploit the characteristics of the problem, the structures of DAG are decomposed and formulated. Merging tasks conforming to the first structure into task blocks can simplify DAG. Four special types of tasks are extracted from the second and third structures, and are preferentially scheduled in task scheduling stage. Then, a new interrelated calculation method of estimated start time and actual start time of tasks is proposed, which can complete the task-to-resource mapping. Finally, T2FA is devised, which incorporates two important phases, including pre-processing and task scheduling. Experimental results show that T2FA can achieve significantly better schedules in most test cases compared to several existing algorithms.
Zai-Xing Sun, Chonglin Gu, Hejiao Huang, Honglin Zhang
CLOUD4