Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Damek Davis

dblp:137/7784 · also Damek Shea Davis · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
10ranked-venue papers
5as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-2105-4641ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 5 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
8 papers
Optimization for machine learning · 47% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 31% Learning theory · 12%
Theoretical computer science
5 papers
Mathematical optimization · 96% Algorithms and data structures · 4%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 80% Machine learning and data management · 20%

Topics — the 30 heaviest of 37, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › parameter estimation
expectation-maximization
1.122024
Global Optimality of the EM Algorithm for Mixtures of Two-Component Linear Regressions · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2024
Global Convergence of the EM Algorithm for Mixtures of Two Component Linear Regression · COLT 2019
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convergence analysis
1.022023
Aiming towards the minimizers: fast convergence of SGD for overparametrized problems · NeurIPS 2023
Global Convergence of the EM Algorithm for Mixtures of Two Component Linear Regression · COLT 2019
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › proximal methods
proximal point method
0.922021
From Low Probability to High Confidence in Stochastic Convex Optimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021
High probability guarantees for stochastic convex optimization · COLT 2020
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization
stochastic convex optimization
0.922021
From Low Probability to High Confidence in Stochastic Convex Optimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021
High probability guarantees for stochastic convex optimization · COLT 2020
Mathematical optimization
stochastic optimization
0.922021
From Low Probability to High Confidence in Stochastic Convex Optimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021
High probability guarantees for stochastic convex optimization · COLT 2020
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › parameter estimation
covariance estimation
0.912025
Online Covariance Estimation in Nonsmooth Stochastic Approximation · COLT 2025
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic approximation
0.912025
Online Covariance Estimation in Nonsmooth Stochastic Approximation · COLT 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model › mixture model
mixture of linear regressions
0.812024
Global Optimality of the EM Algorithm for Mixtures of Two-Component Linear Regressions · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory › over-parameterization › interpolation
interpolation regime
0.712023
Aiming towards the minimizers: fast convergence of SGD for overparametrized problems · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient descent
0.712023
Aiming towards the minimizers: fast convergence of SGD for overparametrized problems · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
gradient sampling
0.612022
A gradient sampling method with complexity guarantees for Lipschitz functions in high and low dimensions · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › optimization › continuous optimization
non-smooth optimization
0.612022
A gradient sampling method with complexity guarantees for Lipschitz functions in high and low dimensions · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › gradient-based optimization
subgradient methods
0.612022
A gradient sampling method with complexity guarantees for Lipschitz functions in high and low dimensions · NeurIPS 2022
Mathematical optimization › integer programming
cutting planes
0.612022
A gradient sampling method with complexity guarantees for Lipschitz functions in high and low dimensions · NeurIPS 2022
Mathematical optimization › nonconvex optimization
smooth non-convex optimization
0.612022
A gradient sampling method with complexity guarantees for Lipschitz functions in high and low dimensions · NeurIPS 2022
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization
proximal methods
0.512021
From Low Probability to High Confidence in Stochastic Convex Optimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization
0.412020
High probability guarantees for stochastic convex optimization · COLT 2020
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › regression
mixed linear regression
0.412019
Global Convergence of the EM Algorithm for Mixtures of Two Component Linear Regression · COLT 2019
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › coordinate descent
block coordinate descent
0.212016
The Sound of APALM Clapping: Faster Nonsmooth Nonconvex Optimization with Stochastic Asynchronous PALM · NIPS 2016
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › non-convex optimization
non-smooth non-convex optimization
0.212016
The Sound of APALM Clapping: Faster Nonsmooth Nonconvex Optimization with Stochastic Asynchronous PALM · NIPS 2016
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel computing › parallel optimization
asynchronous parallel optimization
0.212016
The Sound of APALM Clapping: Faster Nonsmooth Nonconvex Optimization with Stochastic Asynchronous PALM · NIPS 2016
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra
matrix factorization
0.212016
The Sound of APALM Clapping: Faster Nonsmooth Nonconvex Optimization with Stochastic Asynchronous PALM · NIPS 2016
Mathematical optimization › nonconvex optimization
nonconvex matrix factorization
0.212016
The Sound of APALM Clapping: Faster Nonsmooth Nonconvex Optimization with Stochastic Asynchronous PALM · NIPS 2016
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation › estimation error bounds
statistical rates
0.212024
Global Optimality of the EM Algorithm for Mixtures of Two-Component Linear Regressions · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2024
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
invariant representation
0.212015
Multi-view feature engineering and learning · CVPR 2015
Computer vision › 3D vision
local feature descriptor
0.212015
Multi-view feature engineering and learning · CVPR 2015
Computer vision › 3D vision
multi-view geometry
0.212015
Multi-view feature engineering and learning · CVPR 2015
Computer vision › 3D vision › feature matching › multi-image matching
multi-view matching
0.212015
Multi-view feature engineering and learning · CVPR 2015
Computer vision › 3D vision › feature matching › local feature matching
wide-baseline matching
0.212015
Multi-view feature engineering and learning · CVPR 2015
Information retrieval › similarity search › nearest neighbor search
approximate nearest neighbor search
0.212014
Asymmetric Sparse Kernel Approximations for Large-Scale Visual Search · CVPR 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

batch-means estimator · 1.7asymptotic normality · 1.7proxboost · 1.4subgradient oracle · 1.1expectation-maximization · 1.1online-to-offline conversion · 1.0robust distance estimation · 0.9minimax rates · 0.8stochastic gradient descent · 0.7regularity condition · 0.7cutting-plane algorithm · 0.6cutting plane algorithm · 0.6stochastic gradient · 0.5proximal alternating linearized minimization · 0.5asynchronous parallelization · 0.5sparse approximation · 0.2locality-sensitive hashing · 0.2kernel embedding · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Online Covariance Estimation in Nonsmooth Stochastic Approximation
abstract
We consider applying stochastic approximation (SA) methods to solve nonsmooth variational inclusion problems. Existing studies have shown that the averaged iterates of SA methods exhibit asymptotic normality, with an optimal limiting covariance matrix in the local minimax sense of Hájek and Le Cam. However, no methods have been proposed to estimate this covariance matrix in a nonsmooth and potentially non-monotone (nonconvex) setting. In this paper, we study an online batch-means covariance matrix estimator introduced in Zhu et al. (2023). The estimator groups the SA iterates appropriately and computes the sample covariance among batches as an estimate of the limiting covariance. Its construction does not require prior knowledge of the total sample size, and updates can be performed recursively as new data arrives. We establish that, as long as the batch size sequence is properly specified (depending on the stepsize sequence), the estimator achieves a convergence rate of order $O(\sqrt{d}n^{-1/8+\varepsilon})$ for any $\varepsilon>0$, where $d$ and $n$ denote the problem dimensionality and the number of iterations (or samples) used. Although the problem is nonsmooth and potentially non-monotone (nonconvex), our convergence rate matches the best-known rate for covariance estimation methods using only first-order information in smooth and strongly-convex settings. The consistency of this covariance estimator enables asymptotically valid statistical inference, including constructing confidence intervals and performing hypothesis testing.
Krishna Balasubramanian, Damek Davis, Dmitriy Drusvyatskiy, Sen Na
COLT4
2024 Global Optimality of the EM Algorithm for Mixtures of Two-Component Linear Regressions
abstract
Recent results established that EM enjoys global convergence for Gaussian Mixture Models. For Mixed Linear Regression, however, only local convergence results have been established, and those only for the high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) regime. In this work, we completely characterize the global optimality of EM: we show that starting from any randomly initialized point, the EM algorithm converges to the true parameter${\beta }^{*}$at the minimax statistical rates under all SNR regimes. Toward this goal, we first show the global convergence of the EM algorithm at the population level. Then we provide a complete characterization of statistical and computational behaviors of EM under all SNR regimes with finite samples. In particular: (i) When the SNR is sufficiently large, the EM updates converge to the true parameter$ {\beta }^{*}$at the standard parametric convergence rate$O((d/n)^{1/2})$after$O(\log (n/d))$iterations. (ii) In the regime where the SNR is above$O((d/n)^{1/4})$and below some constant, the EM iterates converge to a$O({\mathrm { SNR}}^{-1} (d/n)^{1/2})$neighborhood of the true parameter, when the number of iterations is of the order$O({\mathrm { SNR}}^{-2} \log (n/d))$. (iii) In the low SNR regime where the SNR is below$O((d/n)^{1/4})$, we show that EM converges to a$O((d/n)^{1/4})$neighborhood of the true parameters, after$O((n/d)^{1/2})$iterations. By providing tight convergence guarantees of the EM algorithm in middle-to-low SNR regimes, we reveal that in low SNR, EM changes rate, matching the$n^{-1/4}$rate of the MLE, a behavior that previous work had been unable to show.
Jeongyeol Kwon, Yudong Chen 0001, Constantine Caramanis, Damek Davis, Nhat Ho
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory5
2023 Aiming towards the minimizers: fast convergence of SGD for overparametrized problems
abstract
Modern machine learning paradigms, such as deep learning, occur in or close to the interpolation regime, wherein the number of model parameters is much larger than the number of data samples. In this work, we propose a regularity condition within the interpolation regime which endows the stochastic gradient method with the same worst-case iteration complexity as the deterministic gradient method, while using only a single sampled gradient (or a minibatch) in each iteration. In contrast, all existing guarantees require the stochastic gradient method to take small steps, thereby resulting in a much slower linear rate of convergence. Finally, we demonstrate that our condition holds when training sufficiently wide feedforward neural networks with a linear output layer.
Chaoyue Liu 0001, Dmitriy Drusvyatskiy, Mikhail Belkin, Damek Davis, Yi-An Ma
NeurIPS4
2022 A gradient sampling method with complexity guarantees for Lipschitz functions in high and low dimensions
abstract
Zhang et al. (ICML 2020) introduced a novel modification of Goldstein's classical subgradient method, with an efficiency guarantee of $O(\varepsilon^{-4})$ for minimizing Lipschitz functions. Their work, however, makes use of an oracle that is not efficiently implementable. In this paper, we obtain the same efficiency guarantee with a standard subgradient oracle, thus making our algorithm efficiently implementable. Our resulting method works on any Lipschitz function whose value and gradient can be evaluated at points of differentiability. We additionally present a new cutting plane algorithm that achieves an efficiency of $O(d\varepsilon^{-2}\log S)$ for the class of $S$-smooth (and possibly non-convex) functions in low dimensions. Strikingly, this $\epsilon$-dependence matches the lower bounds for the convex setting.
Damek Davis, Dmitriy Drusvyatskiy, Yin Tat Lee, Swati Padmanabhan, Guanghao Ye
NeurIPS1
2021 From Low Probability to High Confidence in Stochastic Convex Optimization
abstract
Standard results in stochastic convex optimization bound the number of samples that an algorithm needs to generate a point with small function value in expectation. More nuanced high probability guarantees are rare, and typically either rely on light-tail noise assumptions or exhibit worse sample complexity. In this work, we show that a wide class of stochastic optimization algorithms for strongly convex problems can be augmented with high confidence bounds at an overhead cost that is only logarithmic in the confidence level and polylogarithmic in the condition number. The procedure we propose, called proxBoost, is elementary and builds on two well-known ingredients: robust distance estimation and the proximal point method. We discuss consequences for both streaming (online) algorithms and offline algorithms based on empirical risk minimization.
Damek Davis, Dmitriy Drusvyatskiy, Lin Xiao 0003, Junyu Zhang 0002
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1
2020 High probability guarantees for stochastic convex optimization
abstract
Standard results in stochastic convex optimization bound the number of samples that an algorithm needs to generate a point with small function value in expectation. More nuanced high probability guarantees are rare, and typically either rely on “light-tail” noise assumptions or exhibit worse sample complexity. In this work, we show that a wide class of stochastic optimization algorithms for strongly convex problems can be augmented with high confidence bounds at an overhead cost that is only logarithmic in the confidence level and polylogarithmic in the condition number. The procedure we propose, called proxBoost, is elementary and builds on two well-known ingredients: robust distance estimation and the proximal point method. We discuss consequences for both streaming (online) algorithms and offline algorithms based on empirical risk minimization.
Damek Davis, Dmitriy Drusvyatskiy
COLT1
2019 Global Convergence of the EM Algorithm for Mixtures of Two Component Linear Regression
abstract
The Expectation-Maximization algorithm is perhaps the most broadly used algorithm for inference of latent variable problems. A theoretical understanding of its performance, however, largely remains lacking. Recent results established that EM enjoys global convergence for Gaussian Mixture Models. For Mixed Linear Regression, however, only local convergence results have been established, and those only for the high SNR regime. We show here that EM converges for mixed linear regression with two components (it is known that it may fail to converge for three or more), and moreover that this convergence holds for random initialization. Our analysis reveals that EM exhibits very different behavior in Mixed Linear Regression from its behavior in Gaussian Mixture Models, and hence our proofs require the development of several new ideas.
Jeongyeol Kwon, Constantine Caramanis, Yudong Chen 0001, Damek Davis
COLT5
2016 The Sound of APALM Clapping: Faster Nonsmooth Nonconvex Optimization with Stochastic Asynchronous PALM
abstract
We introduce the Stochastic Asynchronous Proximal Alternating Linearized Minimization (SAPALM) method, a block coordinate stochastic proximal-gradient method for solving nonconvex, nonsmooth optimization problems. SAPALM is the first asynchronous parallel optimization method that provably converges on a large class of nonconvex, nonsmooth problems. We prove that SAPALM matches the best known rates of convergence --- among synchronous or asynchronous methods --- on this problem class. We provide upper bounds on the number of workers for which we can expect to see a linear speedup, which match the best bounds known for less complex problems, and show that in practice SAPALM achieves this linear speedup. We demonstrate state-of-the-art performance on several matrix factorization problems.
Damek Davis, Brent Edmunds, Madeleine Udell
NIPS1
2015 Multi-view feature engineering and learning
abstract
We frame the problem of local representation of imaging data as the computation of minimal sufficient statistics that are invariant to nuisance variability induced by viewpoint and illumination. We show that, under very stringent conditions, these are related to “feature descriptors” commonly used in Computer Vision. Such conditions can be relaxed if multiple views of the same scene are available. We propose a sampling-based and a point-estimate based approximation of such a representation, compared empirically on image-to-(multiple)image matching, for which we introduce a multi-view wide-baseline matching benchmark, consisting of a mixture of real and synthetic objects with ground truth camera motion and dense three-dimensional geometry.
Jingming Dong, Nikolaos Karianakis, Damek Davis, Joshua Hernandez, Jonathan Balzer, Stefano Soatto
CVPR3
2014 Asymmetric Sparse Kernel Approximations for Large-Scale Visual Search
abstract
We introduce an asymmetric sparse approximate embedding optimized for fast kernel comparison operations arising in large-scale visual search. In contrast to other methods that perform an explicit approximate embedding using kernel PCA followed by a distance compression technique in Rd, which loses information at both steps, our method utilizes the implicit kernel representation directly. In addition, we empirically demonstrate that our method needs no explicit training step and can operate with a dictionary of random exemplars from the dataset. We evaluate our method on three benchmark image retrieval datasets: SIFT1M, ImageNet, and 80M-TinyImages.
Damek Davis, Jonathan Balzer, Stefano Soatto
CVPR1