Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Lucy Xia
dblp:137/7972
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Learning theory · 88% Representation and self-supervised learning · 12% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 96% Medical and health informatics · 4% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory
classification |
1.2 | 2 | 2024 | Non-splitting Neyman-Pearson Classifiers · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 Neyman-Pearson classification: parametrics and sample size requirement · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › classification › binary classification
neyman-pearson classification |
1.2 | 2 | 2024 | Non-splitting Neyman-Pearson Classifiers · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 Neyman-Pearson classification: parametrics and sample size requirement · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
differential expression analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | PseudotimeDE-fast: fast testing of differential gene expression along cell pseudotime · Bioinform. 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › single-cell analysis › single-cell transcriptomics
pseudotime estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | PseudotimeDE-fast: fast testing of differential gene expression along cell pseudotime · Bioinform. 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › single-cell analysis
single-cell transcriptomics |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | PseudotimeDE-fast: fast testing of differential gene expression along cell pseudotime · Bioinform. 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical learning theory |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Non-splitting Neyman-Pearson Classifiers · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction › discriminant analysis
linear discriminant analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Neyman-Pearson classification: parametrics and sample size requirement · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › single-cell analysis
single-cell RNA sequencing |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | PseudotimeDE-fast: fast testing of differential gene expression along cell pseudotime · Bioinform. 2025 |
Medical and health informatics › clinical diagnosis
rare disease diagnosis |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Neyman-Pearson classification: parametrics and sample size requirement · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
linear discriminant analysis · 1.6rcpp acceleration · 0.9sample splitting · 0.9NP oracle inequality · 0.9quadratic form · 0.8central limit theorem · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | PseudotimeDE-fast: fast testing of differential gene expression along cell pseudotimeabstractSUMMARY: Identifying differentially expressed (DE) genes along cell pseudotime is crucial for understanding dynamic biological processes captured by single-cell RNA sequencing. However, existing DE methods either produce invalid P-values by ignoring the uncertainty in pseudotime inference or struggle to scale with the growing size of modern datasets. To address these limitations, we introduce PseudotimeDE-fast, a scalable method for detecting DE genes along pseudotime with well-calibrated P-values. Through comprehensive simulations and real-data analyses, we demonstrate that PseudotimeDE-fast delivers comparable or superior performance to existing approaches while offering substantial improvements in computational efficiency. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: PseudotimeDE-fast is implemented in R with Rcpp acceleration and released under the MIT license. The source code is available at: https://github.com/dsong-lab/PseudotimeDE. Yuheng Lai, Dongyuan Song, Lucy Xia, Jingyi Jessica Li |
Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2024 | Non-splitting Neyman-Pearson ClassifiersabstractThe Neyman-Pearson (NP) binary classification paradigm constrains the more severe type of error (e.g., the type I error) under a preferred level while minimizing the other (e.g., the type II error). This paradigm is suitable for applications such as severe disease diagnosis, fraud detection, among others. A series of NP classifiers have been developed to guarantee the type I error control with high probability. However, these existing classifiers involve a sample splitting step: a mixture of class 0 and class 1 observations to construct a scoring function and some left-out class 0 observations to construct a threshold. This splitting enables classifier threshold construction built upon independence, but it amounts to insufficient use of data for training and a potentially higher type II error. Leveraging a canonical linear discriminant analysis (LDA) model, we derive a quantitative CLT for a certain functional of quadratic forms of the inverse of sample and population covariance matrices, and based on this result, develop for the first time NP classifiers without splitting the training sample. Numerical experiments have confirmed the advantages of our new non-splitting parametric strategy. Jingming Wang, Lucy Xia, Zhigang Bao |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2020 | Neyman-Pearson classification: parametrics and sample size requirementabstractThe Neyman-Pearson (NP) paradigm in binary classification seeks classifiers that achieve a minimal type II error while enforcing the prioritized type I error controlled under some user-specified level $\alpha$. This paradigm serves naturally in applications such as severe disease diagnosis and spam detection, where people have clear priorities among the two error types. Recently, Tong, Feng, and Li (2018) proposed a nonparametric umbrella algorithm that adapts all scoring-type classification methods (e.g., logistic regression, support vector machines, random forest) to respect the given type I error (i.e., conditional probability of classifying a class $0$ observation as class $1$ under the 0-1 coding) upper bound $\alpha$ with high probability, without specific distributional assumptions on the features and the responses. Universal the umbrella algorithm is, it demands an explicit minimum sample size requirement on class $0$, which is often the more scarce class, such as in rare disease diagnosis applications. In this work, we employ the parametric linear discriminant analysis (LDA) model and propose a new parametric thresholding algorithm, which does not need the minimum sample size requirements on class $0$ observations and thus is suitable for small sample applications such as rare disease diagnosis. Leveraging both the existing nonparametric and the newly proposed parametric thresholding rules, we propose four LDA-based NP classifiers, for both low- and high-dimensional settings. On the theoretical front, we prove NP oracle inequalities for one proposed classifier, where the rate for excess type II error benefits from the explicit parametric model assumption. Furthermore, as NP classifiers involve a sample splitting step of class $0$ observations, we construct a new adaptive sample splitting scheme that can be applied universally to NP classifiers, and this adaptive strategy reduces the type II error of these classifiers. The proposed NP classifiers are implemented in the R package nproc. Lucy Xia |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |