Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lingchen Huang

dblp:137/9827 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-4768-9787ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 2 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Coding theory · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
code construction
0.412020
AI Coding: Learning to Construct Error Correction Codes · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2020
Coding theory
error-correcting codes
0.412020
AI Coding: Learning to Construct Error Correction Codes · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2020
Coding theory › channel coding
polar codes
0.412020
AI Coding: Learning to Construct Error Correction Codes · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2020
Coding theory › channel coding › polar codes
polar code construction
0.412020
AI Coding: Learning to Construct Error Correction Codes · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2020
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › block codes
linear block codes
0.112020
AI Coding: Learning to Construct Error Correction Codes · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reinforcement learning · 0.4genetic algorithm · 0.4constructor-evaluator framework · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Strategic live modes and channel incentive in an e-commerce supply chain considering impulsive consumers
Lingchen Huang, Wenjing Shen, Bin Liu 0038, Yaobin Wu
Expert Syst. Appl.1
2020 AI Coding: Learning to Construct Error Correction Codes
abstract
In this paper, we investigate an artificial-intelligence (AI) driven approach to design error correction codes (ECC). Classic error-correction code design based upon coding-theoretic principles typically strives to optimize some performance-related code property such as minimum Hamming distance, decoding threshold, or subchannel reliability ordering. In contrast, AI-driven approaches, such as reinforcement learning (RL) and genetic algorithms, rely primarily on optimization methods to learn the parameters of an optimal code within a certain code family. We employ a constructor-evaluator framework, in which the code constructor can be realized by various AI algorithms and the code evaluator provides code performance metric measurements. The code constructor keeps improving the code construction to maximize code performance that is evaluated by the code evaluator. As examples, we focus on RL and genetic algorithms to construct linear block codes and polar codes. The results show that comparable code performance can be achieved with respect to the existing codes. It is noteworthy that our method can provide superior performances to classic constructions in certain cases (e.g., list decoding for polar codes).
Lingchen Huang, Huazi Zhang, Rong Li 0001, Yiqun Ge, Jun Wang 0062
IEEE Trans. Commun.1
2019 Reinforcement Learning for Nested Polar Code Construction
abstract
In this paper, we model nested polar code construction as a Markov decision process (MDP), and tackle it with advanced reinforcement learning (RL) techniques. First, an MDP environment with state, action, and reward is defined in the context of polar coding. Specifically, a state represents the construction of an (N, K) polar code, an action specifies its reduction to an (N, K - 1) subcode, and the reward is the decoding performance. A neural network architecture consisting of both policy and value networks is proposed to generate actions based on the observed states, aiming at maximizing the overall rewards. A loss function is defined to trade off between exploitation and exploration. To further improve learning efficiency and quality, an “integrated learning” paradigm is proposed. It first employs a genetic algorithm to generate a population of (sub-)optimal polar codes for each (N, K), and then uses them as prior knowledge to refine the policy of RL. Such a paradigm is shown to accelerate the training process, and converge at better performances. Simulation results show that the proposed learning-based polar constructions achieve comparable, or even better, performances than the state of the art under successive cancellation list (SCL) decoders, and meanwhile satisfies the nested property. Last but not least, the learning process does not exploit explicit expert knowledge from polar coding theory.
Lingchen Huang, Huazi Zhang, Rong Li 0001, Yiqun Ge, Jun Wang 0062
GLOBECOM1
2019 Learning to Flip Successive Cancellation Decoding of Polar Codes with LSTM Networks
abstract
The key to successive cancellation (SC) flip decoding of polar codes is to accurately identify the first error bit. The optimal flipping strategy is considered difficult due to lack of an analytical solution. Alternatively, we propose a deep learning aided SC flip algorithm. Specifically, before each SC decoding attempt, a long short-term memory (LSTM) network is exploited to either (i) locate the first error bit, or (ii) undo a previous "wrong" flip. In each SC attempt, the sequence of log likelihood ratios (LLRs) derived in the previous SC attempt is exploited to decide which action to take. Accordingly, a two-stage training method of the LSTM network is proposed, i.e., learn to locate first error bits in the first stage, and then to undo "wrong" flips in the second stage. Simulation results show that the proposed approach identifies error bits more accurately and achieves better block error rate performance than the state-of-the-art SC flip algorithms.
Xianbin Wang 0003, Huazi Zhang, Rong Li 0001, Lingchen Huang, Shengchen Dai, Yourui Huangfu, Jun Wang 0062
PIMRC4