Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Adrian A. Dolinsky

dblp:138/6731 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1996
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-authorComputer networks · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 77% Software maintenance and evolution · 23%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software testing › software reliability
reliability assessment
0.011994
Software reliability estimations for telecommunications products · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1994

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

software reliability models · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1996 Panel: Deploying SRE in Your Organization or Company
abstract
The introduction of some new practices into software organizations can be trying, arduous tasks. Software Reliability is a practice that fits in this category. A well thought out strategy needs to be used to successjidly and rapidly install Software Reliability Engineering (SRE) in a software organization. The successfid practitioner must be prepared to sell SRE, retain consultants, train project personnel, demonstrate it's effectiveness, provide measurements of the results, and advertise them. This panel, composed of four members with practical industry experience, will examine all of these areas as it explores the question: "What are the steps for bringing SRE into my organization or company?"
Adrian A. Dolinsky, Dave Rentschler, Sue Steele, John A. Teresinski, James C. Widmaier
ISSRE1
1995 Software reliability engineering study of a large-scale telecommunications software system
abstract
Software reliability is a crucial performance factor of telecommunications network elements and operational systems. This paper describes the state-of-practice software reliability engineering (SRE) methods that we selected and organized into an SRE framework for use at Bellcore. This framework comprises several SRE methods: determination of a reliability objective for a product, development and use of operational profiles, reliability modeling and estimation (prediction) to manage system testing, estimation of the product's reliability in the field, and subsequent validation of this estimate using actual field data. Reliability modeling involves assessment of several models according to their predictive accuracy and the use of the most accurate model for reliability estimation. We have successfully tested this framework on several pilot projects. As part of these projects, we tested the usefulness of three different reliability modeling tools [the Economic Stop-Test Model (ESTM), Computer-Aided Software Reliability Estimation (CASRE) and Software Reliability Modelling Programs (SRMP)], as well as several different system test time metrics. This paper describes one of these pilot projects, involving a large operational system for networks.
D. W. Carman, Adrian A. Dolinsky, Michael R. Lyu, Jinsong S. Yu
ISSRE2
1994 Software reliability estimations for telecommunications products
abstract
Reliability of software used in telecommunications networks is a crucial determinant of network performance. Software reliability (SR) estimation is an important element of a network product's reliability management. In particular, SR estimation can guide the product's system testing process and releasability decisions. SR estimation is performed using an appropriate SR estimation model. However, the art of SR estimation is still evolving. There are many available SR estimation models to select from, with different models being appropriate for different applications. Although there is no "ultimate" and "universal" SR model on the horizon (and there may not be one in the foreseeable future), methods have been developed for selecting a trustworthy SR model for each application. The present authors have been analyzing and adapting these methods for applicability to network software. Their results indicate that there already exist methods for SR model selection which are practical to use for telecommunications software. If utilized, these methods can promote significant improvements in SR management. The paper presents the results to date.>
Adrian A. Dolinsky, Stuart E. Glickman
IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun.1