Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nicholas C. Fuller
dblp:138/8039
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Reinforcement learning · 77% Trustworthy machine learning · 23% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Cloud and datacenter computing · 43% Distributed systems · 30% Performance modeling and evaluation · 21% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
agent evaluation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ITBench: Evaluating AI Agents across Diverse Real-World IT Automation Tasks · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
AI safety |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | ITBench: Evaluating AI Agents across Diverse Real-World IT Automation Tasks · ICML 2025 |
Cloud and datacenter computing
cluster resource management and scheduling |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | MRONLINE: MapReduce online performance tuning · HPDC 2014 |
Cloud and datacenter computing › configuration tuning
online tuning |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | MRONLINE: MapReduce online performance tuning · HPDC 2014 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
performance tuning |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | MRONLINE: MapReduce online performance tuning · HPDC 2014 |
Parallel and multicore computing › data-parallel programming
mapreduce |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | MRONLINE: MapReduce online performance tuning · HPDC 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
benchmarking · 1.7online tuning · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | ITBench: Evaluating AI Agents across Diverse Real-World IT Automation TasksabstractRealizing the vision of using AI agents to automate critical IT tasks depends on the ability to measure and understand effectiveness of proposed solutions. We introduce ITBench, a framework that offers a systematic methodology for benchmarking AI agents to address real-world IT automation tasks. Our initial release targets three key areas: Site Reliability Engineering (SRE), Compliance and Security Operations (CISO), and Financial Operations (FinOps). The design enables AI researchers to understand the challenges and opportunities of AI agents for IT automation with push-button workflows and interpretable metrics. IT-Bench includes an initial set of 102 real-world scenarios, which can be easily extended by community contributions. Our results show that agents powered by state-of-the-art models resolve only 11.4% of SRE scenarios, 25.2% of CISO scenarios, and 25.8% of FinOps scenarios (excluding anomaly detection). For FinOps-specific anomaly detection (AD) scenarios, AI agents achieve an F1 score of 0.35. We expect ITBench to be a key enabler of AI-driven IT automation that is correct, safe, and fast. IT-Bench, along with a leaderboard and sample agent implementations, is available at https://github.com/ibm/itbench. Saurabh Jha, Rohan R. Arora, Yuji Watanabe, Takumi Yanagawa, Yinfang Chen, Jackson Clark, Bhavya, Mudit Verma, Hirokuni Kitahara, Noah Zheutlin, Saki Takano, Divya Pathak, Felix George, Xinbo Wu, Bekir O. Turkkan, Gerard Vanloo, Michael Nidd, Oishik Chatterjee, Pranjal Gupta, Suranjana Samanta, Pooja Aggarwal, Rong Lee, Jae-wook Ahn, Debanjana Kar, Amit M. Paradkar, Yu Deng 0004, Pratibha Moogi, Prateeti Mohapatra, Naoki Abe, Chandrasekhar Narayanaswami 0001, Tianyin Xu, Lav R. Varshney, Ruchi Mahindru, Anca Sailer, Larisa Shwartz, Daby M. Sow, Nicholas C. Fuller, Ruchir Puri |
ICML | 39 |
| 2014 | MRONLINE: MapReduce online performance tuningabstractMapReduce job parameter tuning is a daunting and time consuming task. The parameter configuration space is huge; there are more than 70 parameters that impact job performance. It is also difficult for users to determine suitable values for the parameters without first having a good understanding of the MapReduce application characteristics. Thus, it is a challenge to systematically explore the parameter space and select a near-optimal configuration. Extant offline tuning approaches are slow and inefficient as they entail multiple test runs and significant human effort. Liangzhao Zeng, Shicong Meng, Jian Tan 0001, Li Zhang 0002, Ali Raza Butt, Nicholas C. Fuller |
HPDC | 7 |
| 2013 | VMAR: Optimizing I/O Performance and Resource Utilization in the Cloud
Zhiming Shen, Zhe Zhang 0005, Andrzej Kochut, Alexei A. Karve, Minkyong Kim, Hui Lei 0001, Nicholas C. Fuller |
Middleware | 8 |