Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Stanislaw Jastrzebski
dblp:139/0187 · also Stanislaw K. Jastrzebski, Stanislaw Kamil Jastrzebski
· DBLP profile ↗
15ranked-venue papers
5as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-4138-1818ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 13 · 5 first-author · 3 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
10 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 37% Optimization for machine learning · 19% Learning theory · 15% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 23 heaviest of 25, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Characterizing and Overcoming the Greedy Nature of Learning in Multi-modal Deep Neural Networks · ICML 2022 Catastrophic Fisher Explosion: Early Phase Fisher Matrix Impacts Generalization · ICML 2021 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
modality imbalance |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Characterizing and Overcoming the Greedy Nature of Learning in Multi-modal Deep Neural Networks · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › multimodal deep learning
multimodal model training |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Characterizing and Overcoming the Greedy Nature of Learning in Multi-modal Deep Neural Networks · ICML 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular informatics
cheminformatics |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | HuggingMolecules: An Open-Source Library for Transformer-Based Molecular Property Prediction (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
molecular property prediction |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | HuggingMolecules: An Open-Source Library for Transformer-Based Molecular Property Prediction (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
implicit regularization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Catastrophic Fisher Explosion: Early Phase Fisher Matrix Impacts Generalization · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › loss landscape
loss landscape curvature |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Catastrophic Fisher Explosion: Early Phase Fisher Matrix Impacts Generalization · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
autoencoder |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Cramer-Wold Auto-Encoder · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › autoencoder
wasserstein autoencoder |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Cramer-Wold Auto-Encoder · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › parameter-efficient fine-tuning
adapter modules |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLP · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
loss landscape |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | On the Relation Between the Sharpest Directions of DNN Loss and the SGD Step Length · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › loss landscape
loss landscape geometry |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Large Scale Structure of Neural Network Loss Landscapes · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
parameter-efficient transfer learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLP · ICML 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model › large language model adaptation
pre-trained language model fine-tuning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLP · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient descent |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | On the Relation Between the Sharpest Directions of DNN Loss and the SGD Step Length · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
iterative inference |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Residual Connections Encourage Iterative Inference · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › convolutional neural network
residual network |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Residual Connections Encourage Iterative Inference · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networks · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory
memorization and generalization |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networks · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | HuggingMolecules: An Open-Source Library for Transformer-Based Molecular Property Prediction (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
training dynamics |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | The Break-Even Point on Optimization Trajectories of Deep Neural Networks · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
ensemble learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Large Scale Structure of Neural Network Loss Landscapes · NeurIPS 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
text classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLP · ICML 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
transformer models · 1.1conditional utilization rate · 0.6conditional learning speed balancing · 0.6stochastic gradient descent · 0.5fisher information matrix · 0.5sliced wasserstein distance · 0.4maximum mean discrepancy · 0.4cramer-wold kernel · 0.4break-even point analysis · 0.4SGD step length · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | An Efficient Deep Neural Network to Classify Large 3D Images With Small Objectsabstract3D imaging enables accurate diagnosis by providing spatial information about organ anatomy. However, using 3D images to train AI models is computationally challenging because they consist of 10x or 100x more pixels than their 2D counterparts. To be trained with high-resolution 3D images, convolutional neural networks resort to downsampling them or projecting them to 2D. We propose an effective alternative, a neural network that enables efficient classification of full-resolution 3D medical images. Compared to off-the-shelf convolutional neural networks, our network, 3D Globally-Aware Multiple Instance Classifier (3D-GMIC), uses 77.98%-90.05% less GPU memory and 91.23%-96.02% less computation. While it is trained only with image-level labels, without segmentation labels, it explains its predictions by providing pixel-level saliency maps. On a dataset collected at NYU Langone Health, including 85,526 patients with full-field 2D mammography (FFDM), synthetic 2D mammography, and 3D mammography, 3D-GMIC achieves an AUC of 0.831 (95% CI: 0.769-0.887) in classifying breasts with malignant findings using 3D mammography. This is comparable to the performance of GMIC on FFDM (0.816, 95% CI: 0.737-0.878) and synthetic 2D (0.826, 95% CI: 0.754-0.884), which demonstrates that 3D-GMIC successfully classified large 3D images despite focusing computation on a smaller percentage of its input compared to GMIC. Therefore, 3D-GMIC identifies and utilizes extremely small regions of interest from 3D images consisting of hundreds of millions of pixels, dramatically reducing associated computational challenges. 3D-GMIC generalizes well to BCS-DBT, an external dataset from Duke University Hospital, achieving an AUC of 0.848 (95% CI: 0.798-0.896). Jungkyu Park 0001, Jakub Chledowski, Stanislaw Jastrzebski, Jan Sylwester Witowski, Yanqi Xu, Linda Du, Sushma Gaddam, Eric Kim, Alana Lewin, Ujas Parikh, Anastasia Plaunova, Sardius Chen, Alexandra Millet, Kristine Pysarenko, Shalin Patel, Julia E. Goldberg, Melanie Wegener, Linda Moy, Laura Heacock, Beatriu Reig, Krzysztof J. Geras |
IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging | 3 |
| 2022 | HuggingMolecules: An Open-Source Library for Transformer-Based Molecular Property Prediction (Student Abstract)abstractLarge-scale transformer-based methods are gaining popularity as a tool for predicting the properties of chemical compounds, which is of central importance to the drug discovery process. To accelerate their development and dissemination among the community, we are releasing HuggingMolecules -- an open-source library, with a simple and unified API, that provides the implementation of several state-of-the-art transformers for molecular property prediction. In addition, we add a comparison of these methods on several regression and classification datasets. HuggingMolecules package is available at: github.com/gmum/huggingmolecules. Piotr Gainski, Lukasz Maziarka, Tomasz Danel, Stanislaw Jastrzebski |
AAAI | 4 |
| 2022 | Characterizing and Overcoming the Greedy Nature of Learning in Multi-modal Deep Neural NetworksabstractWe hypothesize that due to the greedy nature of learning in multi-modal deep neural networks, these models tend to rely on just one modality while under-fitting the other modalities. Such behavior is counter-intuitive and hurts the models’ generalization, as we observe empirically. To estimate the model’s dependence on each modality, we compute the gain on the accuracy when the model has access to it in addition to another modality. We refer to this gain as the conditional utilization rate. In the experiments, we consistently observe an imbalance in conditional utilization rates between modalities, across multiple tasks and architectures. Since conditional utilization rate cannot be computed efficiently during training, we introduce a proxy for it based on the pace at which the model learns from each modality, which we refer to as the conditional learning speed. We propose an algorithm to balance the conditional learning speeds between modalities during training and demonstrate that it indeed addresses the issue of greedy learning. The proposed algorithm improves the model’s generalization on three datasets: Colored MNIST, ModelNet40, and NVIDIA Dynamic Hand Gesture. Nan Wu 0008, Stanislaw Jastrzebski, Kyunghyun Cho, Krzysztof J. Geras |
ICML | 2 |
| 2021 | Catastrophic Fisher Explosion: Early Phase Fisher Matrix Impacts GeneralizationabstractThe early phase of training a deep neural network has a dramatic effect on the local curvature of the loss function. For instance, using a small learning rate does not guarantee stable optimization because the optimization trajectory has a tendency to steer towards regions of the loss surface with increasing local curvature. We ask whether this tendency is connected to the widely observed phenomenon that the choice of the learning rate strongly influences generalization. We first show that stochastic gradient descent (SGD) implicitly penalizes the trace of the Fisher Information Matrix (FIM), a measure of the local curvature, from the start of training. We argue it is an implicit regularizer in SGD by showing that explicitly penalizing the trace of the FIM can significantly improve generalization. We highlight that poor final generalization coincides with the trace of the FIM attaining a large value early in training, to which we refer as catastrophic Fisher explosion. Finally, to gain insight into the regularization effect of penalizing the trace of the FIM, we show that it limits memorization by reducing the learning speed of examples with noisy labels more than that of the examples with clean labels. Stanislaw Jastrzebski, Devansh Arpit, Oliver Åstrand, Giancarlo Kerg, Huan Wang 0016, Caiming Xiong, Richard Socher, Kyunghyun Cho, Krzysztof J. Geras |
ICML | 1 |
| 2020 | The Break-Even Point on Optimization Trajectories of Deep Neural Networks
Stanislaw Jastrzebski, Maciej Szymczak, Stanislav Fort, Devansh Arpit, Jacek Tabor, Kyunghyun Cho, Krzysztof J. Geras |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2020 | Non-linear ICA Based on Cramer-Wold Metric
Przemyslaw Spurek, Aleksandra Nowak 0001, Jacek Tabor, Lukasz Maziarka, Stanislaw Jastrzebski |
ICONIP (3) | 5 |
| 2020 | Cramer-Wold Auto-EncoderabstractThe computation of the distance to the true distribution is a key component of most state-of-the-art generative models. Inspired by prior works on the Sliced-Wasserstein Auto-Encoders (SWAE) and the Wasserstein Auto-Encoders with MMD-based penalty (WAE-MMD), we propose a new generative model - a Cramer-Wold Auto-Encoder (CWAE). A fundamental component of CWAE is the characteristic kernel, the construction of which is one of the goals of this paper, from here on referred to as the Cramer-Wold kernel. Its main distinguishing feature is that it has a closed-form of the kernel product of radial Gaussians. Consequently, CWAE model has a~closed-form for the distance between the posterior and the normal prior, which simplifies the optimization procedure by removing the need to sample in order to compute the loss function. At the same time, CWAE performance often improves upon WAE-MMD and SWAE on standard benchmarks. Szymon Knop, Przemyslaw Spurek, Jacek Tabor, Igor T. Podolak, Marcin Mazur, Stanislaw Jastrzebski |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 6 |
| 2020 | Deep Neural Networks Improve Radiologists' Performance in Breast Cancer ScreeningabstractWe present a deep convolutional neural network for breast cancer screening exam classification, trained, and evaluated on over 200000 exams (over 1000000 images). Our network achieves an AUC of 0.895 in predicting the presence of cancer in the breast, when tested on the screening population. We attribute the high accuracy to a few technical advances. 1) Our network's novel two-stage architecture and training procedure, which allows us to use a high-capacity patch-level network to learn from pixel-level labels alongside a network learning from macroscopic breast-level labels. 2) A custom ResNet-based network used as a building block of our model, whose balance of depth and width is optimized for high-resolution medical images. 3) Pretraining the network on screening BI-RADS classification, a related task with more noisy labels. 4) Combining multiple input views in an optimal way among a number of possible choices. To validate our model, we conducted a reader study with 14 readers, each reading 720 screening mammogram exams, and show that our model is as accurate as experienced radiologists when presented with the same data. We also show that a hybrid model, averaging the probability of malignancy predicted by a radiologist with a prediction of our neural network, is more accurate than either of the two separately. To further understand our results, we conduct a thorough analysis of our network's performance on different subpopulations of the screening population, the model's design, training procedure, errors, and properties of its internal representations. Our best models are publicly available at https://github.com/nyukat/breast_cancer_classifier. Nan Wu 0008, Jason Phang, Jungkyu Park 0001, Yiqiu Shen, Zhe Huang 0005, Masha Zorin, Stanislaw Jastrzebski, Thibault Févry, Joe Katsnelson, Eric Kim, Stacey Wolfson, Ujas Parikh, Sushma Gaddam, Leng Leng Young Lin, Kara Ho, Joshua D. Weinstein, Beatriu Reig, Yiming Gao 0003, Hildegard Toth, Kristine Pysarenko, Alana Lewin, Jiyon Lee, Krystal Airola, Eralda Mema, Stephanie Chung, Esther Hwang, Naziya Samreen, Sungheon Gene Kim, Laura Heacock, Linda Moy, Kyunghyun Cho, Krzysztof J. Geras |
IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging | 7 |
| 2019 | Dynamical Isometry is Achieved in Residual Networks in a Universal Way for any Activation FunctionabstractWe demonstrate that in residual neural networks (ResNets) dynamical isometry is achievable irrespective of the activation function used. We do that by deriving, with the help of Free Probability and Random Matrix Theories, a universal formula for the spectral density of the input-output Jacobian at initialization, in the large network width and depth limit. The resulting singular value spectrum depends on a single parameter, which we calculate for a variety of popular activation functions, by analyzing the signal propagation in the artificial neural network. We corroborate our results with numerical simulations of both random matrices and ResNets applied to the CIFAR-10 classification problem. Moreover, we study consequences of this universal behavior for the initial and late phases of the learning processes. We conclude by drawing attention to the simple fact, that initialization acts as a confounding factor between the choice of activation function and the rate of learning. We propose that in ResNets this can be resolved based on our results by ensuring the same level of dynamical isometry at initialization. Wojciech Tarnowski, Piotr Warchol, Stanislaw Jastrzebski, Jacek Tabor, Maciej A. Nowak |
AISTATS | 3 |
| 2019 | On the Relation Between the Sharpest Directions of DNN Loss and the SGD Step Length
Stanislaw Jastrzebski, Zachary Kenton, Nicolas Ballas, Asja Fischer, Yoshua Bengio, Amos J. Storkey |
ICLR (Poster) | 1 |
| 2019 | Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPabstractFine-tuning large pretrained models is an effective transfer mechanism in NLP. However, in the presence of many downstream tasks, fine-tuning is parameter inefficient: an entire new model is required for every task. As an alternative, we propose transfer with adapter modules. Adapter modules yield a compact and extensible model; they add only a few trainable parameters per task, and new tasks can be added without revisiting previous ones. The parameters of the original network remain fixed, yielding a high degree of parameter sharing. To demonstrate adapter’s effectiveness, we transfer the recently proposed BERT Transformer model to $26$ diverse text classification tasks, including the GLUE benchmark. Adapters attain near state-of-the-art performance, whilst adding only a few parameters per task. On GLUE, we attain within $0.8%$ of the performance of full fine-tuning, adding only $3.6%$ parameters per task. By contrast, fine-tuning trains $100%$ of the parameters per task. Neil Houlsby, Andrei Giurgiu, Stanislaw Jastrzebski, Bruna Morrone, Quentin de Laroussilhe, Andrea Gesmundo, Mona Attariyan, Sylvain Gelly |
ICML | 3 |
| 2019 | Large Scale Structure of Neural Network Loss LandscapesabstractThere are many surprising and perhaps counter-intuitive properties of optimization of deep neural networks. We propose and experimentally verify a unified phenomenological model of the loss landscape that incorporates many of them. High dimensionality plays a key role in our model. Our core idea is to model the loss landscape as a set of high dimensional \emph{wedges} that together form a large-scale, inter-connected structure and towards which optimization is drawn. We first show that hyperparameter choices such as learning rate, network width and $L_2$ regularization, affect the path optimizer takes through the landscape in similar ways, influencing the large scale curvature of the regions the optimizer explores. Finally, we predict and demonstrate new counter-intuitive properties of the loss-landscape. We show an existence of low loss subspaces connecting a set (not only a pair) of solutions, and verify it experimentally. Finally, we analyze recently popular ensembling techniques for deep networks in the light of our model. Stanislav Fort, Stanislaw Jastrzebski |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2018 | Width of Minima Reached by Stochastic Gradient Descent is Influenced by Learning Rate to Batch Size Ratio
Stanislaw Jastrzebski, Zachary Kenton, Devansh Arpit, Nicolas Ballas, Asja Fischer, Yoshua Bengio, Amos J. Storkey |
ICANN (3) | 1 |
| 2018 | Residual Connections Encourage Iterative Inference
Stanislaw Jastrzebski, Devansh Arpit, Nicolas Ballas, Vikas Verma, Tong Che, Yoshua Bengio |
ICLR (Poster) | 1 |
| 2017 | A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep NetworksabstractWe examine the role of memorization in deep learning, drawing connections to capacity, generalization, and adversarial robustness. While deep networks are capable of memorizing noise data, our results suggest that they tend to prioritize learning simple patterns first. In our experiments, we expose qualitative differences in gradient-based optimization of deep neural networks (DNNs) on noise vs.~real data. We also demonstrate that for appropriately tuned explicit regularization (e.g.,~dropout) we can degrade DNN training performance on noise datasets without compromising generalization on real data. Our analysis suggests that the notions of effective capacity which are dataset independent are unlikely to explain the generalization performance of deep networks when trained with gradient based methods because training data itself plays an important role in determining the degree of memorization. Devansh Arpit, Stanislaw Jastrzebski, Nicolas Ballas, David Krueger 0001, Emmanuel Bengio, Maxinder S. Kanwal, Tegan Maharaj, Asja Fischer, Aaron C. Courville, Yoshua Bengio, Simon Lacoste-Julien |
ICML | 2 |