Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Toshiki Kataoka
dblp:139/0294
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 44% Reinforcement learning · 34% Generative modeling · 22% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
deep reinforcement learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | ChainerRL: A Deep Reinforcement Learning Library · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative adversarial network |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Spectral Normalization for Generative Adversarial Networks · ICLR 2018 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
normalization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Spectral Normalization for Generative Adversarial Networks · ICLR 2018 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › normalization
spectral normalization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Spectral Normalization for Generative Adversarial Networks · ICLR 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
deep reinforcement learning algorithms · 0.5spectral normalization · 0.3adversarial training · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | ChainerRL: A Deep Reinforcement Learning LibraryabstractIn this paper, we introduce ChainerRL, an open-source deep reinforcement learning (DRL) library built using Python and the Chainer deep learning framework. ChainerRL implements a comprehensive set of DRL algorithms and techniques drawn from state-of-the-art research in the field. To foster reproducible research, and for instructional purposes, ChainerRL provides scripts that closely replicate the original papers' experimental settings and reproduce published benchmark results for several algorithms. Lastly, ChainerRL offers a visualization tool that enables the qualitative inspection of trained agents. The ChainerRL source code can be found on GitHub: https://github.com/chainer/chainerrl. Yasuhiro Fujita 0001, Prabhat Nagarajan, Toshiki Kataoka, Takahiro Ishikawa |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 3 |
| 2018 | Spectral Normalization for Generative Adversarial Networks
Takeru Miyato, Toshiki Kataoka, Masanori Koyama, Yuichi Yoshida |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2018 | Coinductive predicates and final sequences in a fibrationabstractCoinductive predicates express persisting ‘safety’ specifications of transition systems. Previous observations by Hermida and Jacobs identify coinductive predicates as suitable final coalgebras in afibration– a categorical abstraction of predicate logic. In this paper, we follow the spirit of a seminal work by Worrell and study final sequences in a fibration. Our main contribution is to identify some categorical ‘size restriction’ axioms that guarantee stabilization of final sequences after ω steps. In its course, we develop a relevant categorical infrastructure that relates fibrations and locally presentable categories, a combination that does not seem to be studied a lot. The genericity of our fibrational framework can be exploited for binary relations (i.e. the logic of ‘binary predicates’) for which a coinductive predicate is bisimilarity, constructive logics (where interests are growing in coinductive predicates) and logics for name-passing processes. Ichiro Hasuo, Toshiki Kataoka, Kenta Cho 0002 |
Math. Struct. Comput. Sci. | 2 |
| 2015 | Towards Concept Analysis in Categories: Limit Inferior as Algebra, Limit Superior as CoalgebraabstractWhile computer programs and logical theories begin by declaring the concepts of interest, be it as data types or as predicates, network computation does not allow such global declarations, and requires concept mining and concept analysis to extract shared semantics for different network nodes. Powerful semantic analysis systems have been the drivers of nearly all paradigm shifts on the web. In categorical terms, most of them can be described as bicompletions of enriched matrices, generalizing the Dedekind-MacNeille-style completions from posets to suitably enriched categories. Yet it has been well known for more than 40 years that ordinary categories themselves in general do not permit such completions. Armed with this new semantical view of Dedekind-MacNeille completions, and of matrix bicompletions, we take another look at this ancient mystery. It turns out that simple categorical versions of the limit superior and limit inferior operations characterize a general notion of Dedekind-MacNeille completion, that seems to be appropriate for ordinary categories, and boils down to the more familiar enriched versions when the limits inferior and superior coincide. This explains away the apparent gap among the completions of ordinary categories, and broadens the path towards categorical concept mining and analysis, opened in previous work. Toshiki Kataoka, Dusko Pavlovic |
CALCO | 1 |