Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mattias Gybels
dblp:139/0628
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Automata and formal languages · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 57% Learning theory · 43% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Automata and formal languages
weighted automata |
0.3 | 2 | 2016 | Dimension-free Concentration Bounds on Hankel Matrices for Spectral Learning · ICML 2014 Dimension-free Concentration Bounds on Hankel Matrices for Spectral Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
spectral learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Dimension-free Concentration Bounds on Hankel Matrices for Spectral Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
concentration inequalities |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Dimension-free Concentration Bounds on Hankel Matrices for Spectral Learning · ICML 2014 |
Automata and formal languages › weighted automata
spectral learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Dimension-free Concentration Bounds on Hankel Matrices for Spectral Learning · ICML 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
singular value decomposition · 0.9concentration bounds · 0.5spectral methods · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Dimension-free Concentration Bounds on Hankel Matrices for Spectral LearningabstractLearning probabilistic models over strings is an important issue for many applications. Spectral methods propose elegant solutions to the problem of inferring weighted automata from finite samples of variable-length strings drawn from an unknown target distribution $p$. These methods rely on a singular value decomposition of a matrix $\v{H}_S$, called the empirical Hankel matrix, that records the frequencies of (some of) the observed strings $S$. The accuracy of the learned distribution depends both on the quantity of information embedded in $\v{H}_S$ and on the distance between $\v{H}_S$ and its mean $\v{H}_p$. Existing concentration bounds seem to indicate that the concentration over $\v{H}_p$ gets looser with its dimensions, suggesting that it might be necessary to bound the dimensions of $\v{H}_S$ for learning. We prove new dimension-free concentration bounds for classical Hankel matrices and several variants, based on prefixes or factors of strings, that are useful for learning. Experiments demonstrate that these bounds are tight and that they significantly improve existing (dimension-dependent) bounds. One consequence of these results is that the spectral learning approach remains consistent even if all the observations are recorded within the empirical matrix. François Denis, Mattias Gybels, Amaury Habrard |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2014 | Dimension-free Concentration Bounds on Hankel Matrices for Spectral LearningabstractLearning probabilistic models over strings is an important issue for many applications. Spectral methods propose elegant solutions to the problem of inferring weighted automata from finite samples of variable-length strings drawn from an unknown target distribution. These methods rely on a singular value decomposition of a matrix H_S, called the Hankel matrix, that records the frequencies of (some of) the observed strings. The accuracy of the learned distribution depends both on the quantity of information embedded in H_S and on the distance between H_S and its mean H_r. Existing concentration bounds seem to indicate that the concentration over H_r gets looser with its size, suggesting to make a trade-off between the quantity of used information and the size of H_r. We propose new dimension-free concentration bounds for several variants of Hankel matrices. Experiments demonstrate that these bounds are tight and that they significantly improve existing bounds. These results suggest that the concentration rate of the Hankel matrix around its mean does not constitute an argument for limiting its size. François Denis, Mattias Gybels, Amaury Habrard |
ICML | 2 |