Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mattias Gybels

dblp:139/0628 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Automata and formal languages · 100%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 57% Learning theory · 43%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Automata and formal languages
weighted automata
0.322016
Dimension-free Concentration Bounds on Hankel Matrices for Spectral Learning · ICML 2014
Dimension-free Concentration Bounds on Hankel Matrices for Spectral Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
spectral learning
0.212016
Dimension-free Concentration Bounds on Hankel Matrices for Spectral Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016
Machine learning › Learning theory
concentration inequalities
0.212014
Dimension-free Concentration Bounds on Hankel Matrices for Spectral Learning · ICML 2014
Automata and formal languages › weighted automata
spectral learning
0.212014
Dimension-free Concentration Bounds on Hankel Matrices for Spectral Learning · ICML 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

singular value decomposition · 0.9concentration bounds · 0.5spectral methods · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Dimension-free Concentration Bounds on Hankel Matrices for Spectral Learning
abstract
Learning probabilistic models over strings is an important issue for many applications. Spectral methods propose elegant solutions to the problem of inferring weighted automata from finite samples of variable-length strings drawn from an unknown target distribution $p$. These methods rely on a singular value decomposition of a matrix $\v{H}_S$, called the empirical Hankel matrix, that records the frequencies of (some of) the observed strings $S$. The accuracy of the learned distribution depends both on the quantity of information embedded in $\v{H}_S$ and on the distance between $\v{H}_S$ and its mean $\v{H}_p$. Existing concentration bounds seem to indicate that the concentration over $\v{H}_p$ gets looser with its dimensions, suggesting that it might be necessary to bound the dimensions of $\v{H}_S$ for learning. We prove new dimension-free concentration bounds for classical Hankel matrices and several variants, based on prefixes or factors of strings, that are useful for learning. Experiments demonstrate that these bounds are tight and that they significantly improve existing (dimension-dependent) bounds. One consequence of these results is that the spectral learning approach remains consistent even if all the observations are recorded within the empirical matrix.
François Denis, Mattias Gybels, Amaury Habrard
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2
2014 Dimension-free Concentration Bounds on Hankel Matrices for Spectral Learning
abstract
Learning probabilistic models over strings is an important issue for many applications. Spectral methods propose elegant solutions to the problem of inferring weighted automata from finite samples of variable-length strings drawn from an unknown target distribution. These methods rely on a singular value decomposition of a matrix H_S, called the Hankel matrix, that records the frequencies of (some of) the observed strings. The accuracy of the learned distribution depends both on the quantity of information embedded in H_S and on the distance between H_S and its mean H_r. Existing concentration bounds seem to indicate that the concentration over H_r gets looser with its size, suggesting to make a trade-off between the quantity of used information and the size of H_r. We propose new dimension-free concentration bounds for several variants of Hankel matrices. Experiments demonstrate that these bounds are tight and that they significantly improve existing bounds. These results suggest that the concentration rate of the Hankel matrix around its mean does not constitute an argument for limiting its size.
François Denis, Mattias Gybels, Amaury Habrard
ICML2