Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Akshay Balsubramani
dblp:139/1297
· DBLP profile ↗
13ranked-venue papers
8as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-1545-9837ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 11 · 8 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
9 papers |
Learning theory · 40% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 17% Trustworthy machine learning · 15% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 66% Medical and health informatics · 34% | |
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 49% Coding theory · 32% Algorithms and data structures · 19% |
Topics — the 28 heaviest of 30, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › drug discovery
computational drug discovery |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Representations of lipid nanoparticles using large language models for transfection efficiency prediction · Bioinform. 2024 |
Medical and health informatics
drug delivery |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Representations of lipid nanoparticles using large language models for transfection efficiency prediction · Bioinform. 2024 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
ensemble learning |
0.7 | 3 | 2016 | Optimal Binary Classifier Aggregation for General Losses · NIPS 2016 Scalable Semi-Supervised Aggregation of Classifiers · NIPS 2015 Optimally Combining Classifiers Using Unlabeled Data · COLT 2015 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
computational genomics |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Accelerating in silico saturation mutagenesis using compressed sensing · Bioinform. 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shifts · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
out-of-distribution generalization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shifts · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shifts · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
classifier combination |
0.4 | 2 | 2015 | Scalable Semi-Supervised Aggregation of Classifiers · NIPS 2015 Optimally Combining Classifiers Using Unlabeled Data · COLT 2015 |
Mathematical optimization
optimal transport |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Learning transport cost from subset correspondence · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | An adaptive nearest neighbor rule for classification · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › classification › nonparametric classification
nearest neighbor classification |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | An adaptive nearest neighbor rule for classification · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
uniform convergence |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | An adaptive nearest neighbor rule for classification · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative adversarial network |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Semantically Decomposing the Latent Spaces of Generative Adversarial Networks · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › disentangled representation learning › disentanglement
latent space disentanglement |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Semantically Decomposing the Latent Spaces of Generative Adversarial Networks · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning
autoencoding |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Optimal Binary Autoencoding with Pairwise Correlations · ICLR (Poster) 2017 |
Coding theory › source coding
optimal coding |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Optimal Binary Autoencoding with Pairwise Correlations · ICLR (Poster) 2017 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › classification
binary classification |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Optimal Binary Classifier Aggregation for General Losses · NIPS 2016 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit
dueling bandits |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Instance-dependent Regret Bounds for Dueling Bandits · COLT 2016 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning › regret bounds
instance-dependent regret bounds |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Instance-dependent Regret Bounds for Dueling Bandits · COLT 2016 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › minimax optimality
minimax optimal prediction |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Optimal Binary Classifier Aggregation for General Losses · NIPS 2016 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
online learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Instance-dependent Regret Bounds for Dueling Bandits · COLT 2016 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
semi-supervised learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Scalable Semi-Supervised Aggregation of Classifiers · NIPS 2015 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › semi-supervised learning
transductive learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Optimally Combining Classifiers Using Unlabeled Data · COLT 2015 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence modeling
sequence model interpretation |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Accelerating in silico saturation mutagenesis using compressed sensing · Bioinform. 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › convergence analysis
finite-sample convergence rates |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | The Fast Convergence of Incremental PCA · NIPS 2013 |
Information retrieval › evaluation
benchmark dataset |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shifts · ICML 2021 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
game theory |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Optimally Combining Classifiers Using Unlabeled Data · COLT 2015 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
minimax analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Optimally Combining Classifiers Using Unlabeled Data · COLT 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
benchmark construction · 1.0large language model embeddings · 0.8gradient boosting · 0.8correlation modeling · 0.6compressed sensing · 0.6autoencoder · 0.6subset correspondence · 0.4optimal transport · 0.4vapnik-chervonenkis theory · 0.4k-nearest neighbors · 0.4generative adversarial network · 0.3dueling bandits · 0.2decision theory · 0.2convex optimization · 0.2minimax analysis · 0.2stochastic gradient descent · 0.2oja's learning rule · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Representations of lipid nanoparticles using large language models for transfection efficiency predictionabstractMOTIVATION: Lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are the most widely used vehicles for mRNA vaccine delivery. The structure of the lipids composing the LNPs can have a major impact on the effectiveness of the mRNA payload. Several properties should be optimized to improve delivery and expression including biodegradability, synthetic accessibility, and transfection efficiency. RESULTS: To optimize LNPs, we developed and tested models that enable the virtual screening of LNPs with high transfection efficiency. Our best method uses the lipid Simplified Molecular-Input Line-Entry System (SMILES) as inputs to a large language model. Large language model-generated embeddings are then used by a downstream gradient-boosting classifier. As we show, our method can more accurately predict lipid properties, which could lead to higher efficiency and reduced experimental time and costs. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Code and data links available at: https://github.com/Sanofi-Public/LipoBART. Saeed Moayedpour, Jonathan Broadbent, Saleh Riahi, Michael Bailey, Hoa V. Thu, Dimitar A. Dobchev, Akshay Balsubramani, Ricardo N. D. Santos, Lorenzo Kogler-Anele, Alejandro Corrochano-Navarro, Sizhen Li, Fernando U. Montoya, Vikram Agarwal, Ziv Bar-Joseph, Sven Jager |
Bioinform. | 7 |
| 2022 | Accelerating in silico saturation mutagenesis using compressed sensingabstractMOTIVATION: In silico saturation mutagenesis (ISM) is a popular approach in computational genomics for calculating feature attributions on biological sequences that proceeds by systematically perturbing each position in a sequence and recording the difference in model output. However, this method can be slow because systematically perturbing each position requires performing a number of forward passes proportional to the length of the sequence being examined. RESULTS: In this work, we propose a modification of ISM that leverages the principles of compressed sensing to require only a constant number of forward passes, regardless of sequence length, when applied to models that contain operations with a limited receptive field, such as convolutions. Our method, named Yuzu, can reduce the time that ISM spends in convolution operations by several orders of magnitude and, consequently, Yuzu can speed up ISM on several commonly used architectures in genomics by over an order of magnitude. Notably, we found that Yuzu provides speedups that increase with the complexity of the convolution operation and the length of the sequence being analyzed, suggesting that Yuzu provides large benefits in realistic settings. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: We have made this tool available at https://github.com/kundajelab/yuzu. Jacob M. Schreiber, Surag Nair, Akshay Balsubramani, Anshul Kundaje |
Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2021 | WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution ShiftsabstractDistribution shifts—where the training distribution differs from the test distribution—can substantially degrade the accuracy of machine learning (ML) systems deployed in the wild. Despite their ubiquity in the real-world deployments, these distribution shifts are under-represented in the datasets widely used in the ML community today. To address this gap, we present WILDS, a curated benchmark of 10 datasets reflecting a diverse range of distribution shifts that naturally arise in real-world applications, such as shifts across hospitals for tumor identification; across camera traps for wildlife monitoring; and across time and location in satellite imaging and poverty mapping. On each dataset, we show that standard training yields substantially lower out-of-distribution than in-distribution performance. This gap remains even with models trained by existing methods for tackling distribution shifts, underscoring the need for new methods for training models that are more robust to the types of distribution shifts that arise in practice. To facilitate method development, we provide an open-source package that automates dataset loading, contains default model architectures and hyperparameters, and standardizes evaluations. The full paper, code, and leaderboards are available at https://wilds.stanford.edu. Pang Wei Koh, Shiori Sagawa, Henrik Marklund, Sang Michael Xie, Marvin Zhang, Akshay Balsubramani, Weihua Hu, Michihiro Yasunaga, Richard L. Phillips, Irena Gao, Etienne David, Ian Stavness, Wei Guo 0002, Berton Earnshaw, Imran S. Haque, Sara Beery, Jure Leskovec, Anshul Kundaje, Emma Pierson, Sergey Levine, Chelsea Finn, Percy Liang |
ICML | 6 |
| 2020 | Learning transport cost from subset correspondence
Ruishan Liu, Akshay Balsubramani, James Zou 0001 |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2019 | An adaptive nearest neighbor rule for classificationabstractWe introduce a variant of the $k$-nearest neighbor classifier in which $k$ is chosen adaptively for each query, rather than supplied as a parameter. The choice of $k$ depends on properties of each neighborhood, and therefore may significantly vary between different points. (For example, the algorithm will use larger $k$ for predicting the labels of points in noisy regions.) We provide theory and experiments that demonstrate that the algorithm performs comparably to, and sometimes better than, $k$-NN with an optimal choice of $k$. In particular, we derive bounds on the convergence rates of our classifier that depend on a local quantity we call the ``advantage'' which is significantly weaker than the Lipschitz conditions used in previous convergence rate proofs. These generalization bounds hinge on a variant of the seminal Uniform Convergence Theorem due to Vapnik and Chervonenkis; this variant concerns conditional probabilities and may be of independent interest. Akshay Balsubramani, Sanjoy Dasgupta, Yoav Freund, Shay Moran |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2018 | Semantically Decomposing the Latent Spaces of Generative Adversarial Networks
Chris Donahue, Zachary C. Lipton, Akshay Balsubramani, Julian J. McAuley |
ICLR (Poster) | 3 |
| 2017 | Optimal Binary Autoencoding with Pairwise Correlations
Akshay Balsubramani |
ICLR (Poster) | 1 |
| 2016 | Instance-dependent Regret Bounds for Dueling BanditsabstractWe study the multi-armed dueling bandit problem in which feedback is provided in the form of relative comparisons between pairs of actions, with the goal of eventually learning to select actions that are close to the best. Following Dudik et al. (2015), we aim for algorithms whose performance approaches that of the optimal randomized choice of actions, the von Neumann winner, expressly avoiding more restrictive assumptions, for instance, regarding the existence of a single best action (a Condorcet winner). In this general setting, the best known algorithms achieve regret O(\sqrtKT) in T rounds with K actions. In this paper, we present the first instance-dependent regret bounds for the general problem, focusing particularly on when the von Neumann winner is sparse. Specifically, we propose a new algorithm whose regret, relative to a unique von Neumann winner with sparsity s, is at most O(\sqrtsT), plus an instance-dependent constant. Thus, when the sparsity is much smaller than the total number of actions, our result indicates that learning can be substantially faster. Akshay Balsubramani, Zohar S. Karnin, Robert E. Schapire, Masrour Zoghi |
COLT | 1 |
| 2016 | Optimal Binary Classifier Aggregation for General LossesabstractWe address the problem of aggregating an ensemble of predictors with known loss bounds in a semi-supervised binary classification setting, to minimize prediction loss incurred on the unlabeled data. We find the minimax optimal predictions for a very general class of loss functions including all convex and many non-convex losses, extending a recent analysis of the problem for misclassification error. The result is a family of semi-supervised ensemble aggregation algorithms which are as efficient as linear learning by convex optimization, but are minimax optimal without any relaxations. Their decision rules take a form familiar in decision theory -- applying sigmoid functions to a notion of ensemble margin -- without the assumptions typically made in margin-based learning. Akshay Balsubramani, Yoav Freund |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2016 | Sequential Nonparametric Testing with the Law of the Iterated Logarithm
Akshay Balsubramani, Aaditya Ramdas |
UAI | 1 |
| 2015 | Optimally Combining Classifiers Using Unlabeled DataabstractWe develop a worst-case analysis of aggregation of classifier ensembles for binary classification. The task of predicting to minimize error is formulated as a game played over a given set of unlabeled data (a transductive setting), where prior label information is encoded as constraints on the game. The minimax solution of this game identifies cases where a weighted combination of the classifiers can perform significantly better than any single classifier. Akshay Balsubramani, Yoav Freund |
COLT | 1 |
| 2015 | Scalable Semi-Supervised Aggregation of ClassifiersabstractWe present and empirically evaluate an efficient algorithm that learns to aggregate the predictions of an ensemble of binary classifiers. The algorithm uses the structure of the ensemble predictions on unlabeled data to yield significant performance improvements. It does this without making assumptions on the structure or origin of the ensemble, without parameters, and as scalably as linear learning. We empirically demonstrate these performance gains with random forests. Akshay Balsubramani, Yoav Freund |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2013 | The Fast Convergence of Incremental PCAabstractWe prove the first finite-sample convergence rates for any incremental PCA algorithm using sub-quadratic time and memory per iteration. The algorithm analyzed is Oja's learning rule, an efficient and well-known scheme for estimating the top principal component. Our analysis of this non-convex problem yields expected and high-probability convergence rates of $\tilde{O}(1/n)$ through a novel technique. We relate our guarantees to existing rates for stochastic gradient descent on strongly convex functions, and extend those results. We also include experiments which demonstrate convergence behaviors predicted by our analysis. Akshay Balsubramani, Sanjoy Dasgupta, Yoav Freund |
NIPS | 1 |