Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Adam M. Packer
dblp:139/1386
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 57% Representation and self-supervised learning · 28% Generative modeling · 15% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Image and video processing · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
neuroscience |
0.5 | 2 | 2017 | Model-based Bayesian inference of neural activity and connectivity from all-optical interrogation of a neural circuit · NIPS 2017 Inferring neural population dynamics from multiple partial recordings of the same neural circuit · NIPS 2013 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience › brain connectivity analysis
neural connectivity inference |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Model-based Bayesian inference of neural activity and connectivity from all-optical interrogation of a neural circuit · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › dynamical system
latent dynamical system |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Inferring neural population dynamics from multiple partial recordings of the same neural circuit · NIPS 2013 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Inferring neural population dynamics from multiple partial recordings of the same neural circuit · NIPS 2013 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning
sparse coding |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Extracting regions of interest from biological images with convolutional sparse block coding · NIPS 2013 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience
neural population dynamics |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Inferring neural population dynamics from multiple partial recordings of the same neural circuit · NIPS 2013 |
Image and video processing › biomedical image analysis
biological image analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Extracting regions of interest from biological images with convolutional sparse block coding · NIPS 2013 |
Image and video processing › sparse representation
convolutional sparse coding |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Extracting regions of interest from biological images with convolutional sparse block coding · NIPS 2013 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Model-based Bayesian inference of neural activity and connectivity from all-optical interrogation of a neural circuit · NIPS 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variational autoencoder · 0.6spike-and-slab prior · 0.6generalized linear model · 0.6bayesian inference · 0.6statistical methods · 0.3latent dynamical system · 0.3convolutional matching pursuit · 0.3K-SVD · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Model-based Bayesian inference of neural activity and connectivity from all-optical interrogation of a neural circuitabstractPopulation activity measurement by calcium imaging can be combined with cellular resolution optogenetic activity perturbations to enable the mapping of neural connectivity in vivo. This requires accurate inference of perturbed and unperturbed neural activity from calcium imaging measurements, which are noisy and indirect, and can also be contaminated by photostimulation artifacts. We have developed a new fully Bayesian approach to jointly inferring spiking activity and neural connectivity from in vivo all-optical perturbation experiments. In contrast to standard approaches that perform spike inference and analysis in two separate maximum-likelihood phases, our joint model is able to propagate uncertainty in spike inference to the inference of connectivity and vice versa. We use the framework of variational autoencoders to model spiking activity using discrete latent variables, low-dimensional latent common input, and sparse spike-and-slab generalized linear coupling between neurons. Additionally, we model two properties of the optogenetic perturbation: off-target photostimulation and photostimulation transients. Using this model, we were able to fit models on 30 minutes of data in just 10 minutes. We performed an all-optical circuit mapping experiment in primary visual cortex of the awake mouse, and use our approach to predict neural connectivity between excitatory neurons in layer 2/3. Predicted connectivity is sparse and consistent with known correlations with stimulus tuning, spontaneous correlation and distance. Laurence Aitchison, Lloyd Russell, Adam M. Packer, Jinyao Yan, Philippe Castonguay, Michael Häusser, Srinivas C. Turaga |
NIPS | 3 |
| 2013 | Extracting regions of interest from biological images with convolutional sparse block codingabstractBiological tissue is often composed of cells with similar morphologies replicated throughout large volumes and many biological applications rely on the accurate identification of these cells and their locations from image data. Here we develop a generative model that captures the regularities present in images composed of repeating elements of a few different types. Formally, the model can be described as convolutional sparse block coding. For inference we use a variant of convolutional matching pursuit adapted to block-based representations. We extend the K-SVD learning algorithm to subspaces by retaining several principal vectors from the SVD decomposition instead of just one. Good models with little cross-talk between subspaces can be obtained by learning the blocks incrementally. We perform extensive experiments on simulated images and the inference algorithm consistently recovers a large proportion of the cells with a small number of false positives. We fit the convolutional model to noisy GCaMP6 two-photon images of spiking neurons and to Nissl-stained slices of cortical tissue and show that it recovers cell body locations without supervision. The flexibility of the block-based representation is reflected in the variability of the recovered cell shapes. Marius Pachitariu, Adam M. Packer, Noah Pettit, Henry Dalgleish, Michael Häusser, Maneesh Sahani |
NIPS | 2 |
| 2013 | Inferring neural population dynamics from multiple partial recordings of the same neural circuitabstractSimultaneous recordings of the activity of large neural populations are extremely valuable as they can be used to infer the dynamics and interactions of neurons in a local circuit, shedding light on the computations performed. It is now possible to measure the activity of hundreds of neurons using 2-photon calcium imaging. However, many computations are thought to involve circuits consisting of thousands of neurons, such as cortical barrels in rodent somatosensory cortex. Here we contribute a statistical method for stitching" together sequentially imaged sets of neurons into one model by phrasing the problem as fitting a latent dynamical system with missing observations. This method allows us to substantially expand the population-sizes for which population dynamics can be characterized---beyond the number of simultaneously imaged neurons. In particular, we demonstrate using recordings in mouse somatosensory cortex that this method makes it possible to predict noise correlations between non-simultaneously recorded neuron pairs." Srinivas C. Turaga, Lars Buesing, Adam M. Packer, Henry Dalgleish, Noah Pettit, Michael Häusser, Jakob H. Macke |
NIPS | 3 |