Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Crystal Maung
dblp:139/1396
· DBLP profile ↗
14ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 13 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 8 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
9 papers |
Algorithms and data structures · 74% Mathematical optimization · 26% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers |
Data mining · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 100% | |
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Privacy and data protection · 100% |
Topics — the 21 heaviest of 21, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data mining › dimensionality reduction
feature selection |
1.1 | 3 | 2025 | Multi-View Unsupervised Column Subset Selection via Combinatorial Search (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2025 Pass-efficient unsupervised feature selection · NIPS 2013 Optimal Column Subset Selection by A-Star Search · AAAI 2015 |
Algorithms and data structures › search algorithms › heuristic search
a* search |
1.1 | 2 | 2025 | Multi-View Unsupervised Column Subset Selection via Combinatorial Search (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2025 Optimal Column Subset Selection by A-Star Search · AAAI 2015 |
Mathematical optimization › sparse learning
feature selection |
0.9 | 3 | 2019 | Heuristic Search Algorithm for Dimensionality Reduction Optimally Combining Feature Selection and Feature Extraction · AAAI 2019 Weighted A* Algorithms for Unsupervised Feature Selection with Provable Bounds on Suboptimality · AAAI 2016 Unsupervised Feature Selection by Heuristic Search with Provable Bounds on Suboptimality · AAAI 2016 |
Algorithms and data structures › search algorithms
combinatorial search |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Multi-View Unsupervised Column Subset Selection via Combinatorial Search (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2025 |
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra
dimensionality reduction |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | Fast Distance Metrics in Low-dimensional Space for Neighbor Search Problems · ICDM 2020 Heuristic Search Algorithm for Dimensionality Reduction Optimally Combining Feature Selection and Feature Extraction · AAAI 2019 |
Mathematical optimization
combinatorial optimization |
0.7 | 3 | 2019 | Solving Generalized Column Subset Selection With Heuristic Search · AAAI 2018 Optimal Column Subset Selection by A-Star Search · AAAI 2015 Heuristic Search Algorithm for Dimensionality Reduction Optimally Combining Feature Selection and Feature Extraction · AAAI 2019 |
Algorithms and data structures › matrix approximation
column subset selection |
0.5 | 2 | 2018 | Solving Generalized Column Subset Selection With Heuristic Search · AAAI 2018 Optimal Column Subset Selection by A-Star Search · AAAI 2015 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
heuristic search |
0.5 | 2 | 2016 | Weighted A* Algorithms for Unsupervised Feature Selection with Provable Bounds on Suboptimality · AAAI 2016 Unsupervised Feature Selection by Heuristic Search with Provable Bounds on Suboptimality · AAAI 2016 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › heuristic search
weighted a |
0.5 | 2 | 2016 | Weighted A* Algorithms for Unsupervised Feature Selection with Provable Bounds on Suboptimality · AAAI 2016 Unsupervised Feature Selection by Heuristic Search with Provable Bounds on Suboptimality · AAAI 2016 |
Algorithms and data structures › similarity search › nearest neighbor search
approximate nearest neighbor search |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Fast Distance Metrics in Low-dimensional Space for Neighbor Search Problems · ICDM 2020 |
Algorithms and data structures › similarity search
nearest neighbor search |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Fast Distance Metrics in Low-dimensional Space for Neighbor Search Problems · ICDM 2020 |
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra › dimensionality reduction
feature extraction |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Heuristic Search Algorithm for Dimensionality Reduction Optimally Combining Feature Selection and Feature Extraction · AAAI 2019 |
Algorithms and data structures › search algorithms
heuristic search |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Solving Generalized Column Subset Selection With Heuristic Search · AAAI 2018 |
Privacy and data protection
privacy-preserving data analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Cleaning the Null Space: A Privacy Mechanism for Predictors · AAAI 2017 |
Privacy and data protection
privacy-preserving machine learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Enhancing the Privacy of Predictors · AAAI 2017 |
Data mining › dimensionality reduction › feature selection
unsupervised feature selection |
0.2 | 2 | 2015 | Pass-efficient unsupervised feature selection · NIPS 2013 Optimal Column Subset Selection by A-Star Search · AAAI 2015 |
Mathematical optimization
discrete optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Optimal Column Subset Selection by A-Star Search · AAAI 2015 |
Algorithms and data structures › matrix approximation
low-rank approximation |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Improved Greedy Algorithms for Sparse Approximation of a Matrix in Terms of Another Matrix · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2015 |
Algorithms and data structures
matrix approximation |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Improved Greedy Algorithms for Sparse Approximation of a Matrix in Terms of Another Matrix · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2015 |
Mathematical optimization › sparse optimization
sparse approximation |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Improved Greedy Algorithms for Sparse Approximation of a Matrix in Terms of Another Matrix · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2015 |
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra
matrix factorization |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Pass-efficient unsupervised feature selection · NIPS 2013 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
weighted a* · 2.7combinatorial search · 1.7branch-and-bound · 1.7heuristic search · 1.3a* search · 0.9principal component analysis · 0.4maximum entropy method · 0.4johnson-lindenstrauss projection · 0.4weighted a · 0.4best-first heuristic search · 0.4privacy-preserving techniques · 0.3null space projection · 0.3eigenvalue-based heuristic · 0.2randomized algorithm · 0.2pivoted QR · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Multi-View Unsupervised Column Subset Selection via Combinatorial Search (Student Abstract)abstractGiven a data matrix, unsupervised column subset selection refers to the problem of identifying a subset of columns that can be used to linearly approximate the original data matrix. This problem has many applications, such as feature selection and representative selection, but solving it optimally is known to be NP-hard. We consider multi-view unsupervised column subset selection, which extends the concept of (single-view) column subset selection to data represented in multiple views or modalities. We introduce a combinatorial search algorithm for this generalized problem. One variant of the algorithm is guaranteed to compute an optimal solution in a setting similar to the classical A* algorithm. Other suboptimal variants, in a setting similar to the weighted A* algorithm, are much faster and provide a solution along with a bound on its quality. Guihong Wan, Ninghui Hao, Crystal Maung, Haim Schweitzer, Chen Zhao 0010, Kun-Hsing Yu, Yevgeniy R. Semenov |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2020 | Fast Distance Metrics in Low-dimensional Space for Neighbor Search ProblemsabstractWe consider popular dimension reduction techniques that project data on a low dimensional subspace. They include Principal Component Analysis, Column Subset Selection, and Johnson-Lindenstrauss projections. These techniques have been classically used to efficiently compute various approximations. We propose the following three-step procedure for enhancing the accuracy of such approximations: 1. Unknown quantities in the approximation are replaced with random variables. 2. The Maximum Entropy method is applied to infer the most likely probability distribution. 3. Expected values of the random variables are used to compute the enhanced estimates. Our use of the Maximum Entropy method requires knowledge of vector norms that can be easily computed during the dimension reduction. We demonstrate significant enhancements in average accuracy for Euclidean distance and Mahalanobis distance, and improvements in evaluating k-nearest neighbors and k-furthest neighbors by using the enhanced Euclidean distance formula. Guihong Wan, Crystal Maung, Haim Schweitzer |
ICDM | 2 |
| 2019 | Heuristic Search Algorithm for Dimensionality Reduction Optimally Combining Feature Selection and Feature ExtractionabstractThe following are two classical approaches to dimensionality reduction: 1. Approximating the data with a small number of features that exist in the data (feature selection). 2. Approximating the data with a small number of arbitrary features (feature extraction). We study a generalization that approximates the data with both selected and extracted features. We show that an optimal solution to this hybrid problem involves a combinatorial search, and cannot be trivially obtained even if one can solve optimally the separate problems of selection and extraction. Our approach that gives optimal and approximate solutions uses a “best first” heuristic search. The algorithm comes with both an a priori and an a posteriori optimality guarantee similar to those that can be obtained for the classical weighted A* algorithm. Experimental results show the effectiveness of the proposed approach. Baokun He, Swair Shah, Crystal Maung, Gordon Arnold, Guihong Wan, Haim Schweitzer |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2019 | Improving the Accuracy of Principal Component Analysis by the Maximum Entropy MethodabstractClassical Principal Component Analysis (PCA) approximates data in terms of projections on a small number of orthogonal vectors. There are simple procedures to efficiently compute various functions of the data from the PCA approximation. The most important function is arguably the Euclidean distance between data items. This can be used, for example, to solve the approximate nearest neighbor problem. We use random variables to model the inherent uncertainty in such approximations, and apply the Maximum Entropy Method to infer the underlying probability distribution. We propose using the expected values of distances between these random variables as improved estimates of the distance. We show experimentally that in most cases results obtained by our method are more accurate than what is obtained by the classical approach. This improves the accuracy of a classical technique that have been used with little change for over 100 years. Guihong Wan, Crystal Maung, Haim Schweitzer |
ICTAI | 2 |
| 2018 | Solving Generalized Column Subset Selection With Heuristic SearchabstractWe address the problem of approximating a matrix by the linear combination of a column sparse matrix and a low rank matrix. Two variants of a heuristic search algorithm are described. The first produces an optimal solution but may be slow, as these problems are believed to be NP-hard. The second is much faster, but only guarantees a suboptimal solution. The quality of the approximation and the optimality criterion can be specified in terms of unitarily invariant norms. Swair Shah, Baokun He, Crystal Maung, Haim Schweitzer |
AAAI | 4 |
| 2017 | Cleaning the Null Space: A Privacy Mechanism for PredictorsabstractIn standard machine learning and regression setting feature values are used to predict some desired information. The privacy challenge considered here is to prevent an adversary from using available feature values to predict confidential information that one wishes to keep secret. We show that this can sometimes be achieved with almost no effect on the qual- ity of predicting desired information. We describe two algorithms aimed at providing such privacy when the predictors have a linear operator in the first stage. The desired effect can be achieved by zeroing out feature components in the approximate null space of the linear operator. Tongyi Cao, Swair Shah, Crystal Maung, Haim Schweitzer |
AAAI | 4 |
| 2017 | Enhancing the Privacy of Predictors
Swair Shah, Tongyi Cao, Crystal Maung, Haim Schweitzer |
AAAI | 4 |
| 2017 | Computing Robust Principal Components by A* SearchabstractPrincipal Component Analysis (PCA) is a classical dimensionality reduction technique that computes a low rank representation of the data. Recent studies have shown how to compute this low rank representation from most of the data, excluding a small amount of outlier data. We describe an algorithm that solves this problem by applying a variant of the A* algorithm to search for the outliers. The results obtained by our algorithm are optimal, and more accurate than the current state of the art. This comes at the cost of running time, which is typically slower than the current state of the art. We also describe a related variant of the A* algorithm that runs much faster and produces a solution that is guaranteed to be near the optimal. Swair Shah, Baokun He, Crystal Maung, Haim Schweitzer |
ICTAI | 3 |
| 2017 | Two-Stage Feature Selection with Unsupervised Second StageabstractA common technique for reducing the running time of feature selection is to perform it in two stages. In the first stage a fast and simple filter is applied to select good candidates. The number of candidates is further reduced in the second stage by an accurate algorithm that may run significantly slower. It is common to distinguish between supervised and unsupervised feature selection. In the supervised case features are selected for predicting a set of labels. Such label information is not used in the unsupervised case. We describe a general framework that can use an arbitrary off-the-shelf unsupervised algorithm for the second stage. The algorithm is applied to the selection obtained in the first stage weighted appropriately. Our main technical result is the computation of these weights. We show that the weights can be found as the solution to a quadratic optimization problem. The solution is deterministic, and improves on previously published studies that use probabilistic ideas to compute the weights. To the best of our knowledge our approach is the first technique for converting a supervised feature selection problem into an unsupervised problem. Complexity analysis shows that the proposed technique is very fast, can be implemented in a single pass over the data, and can take advantage of data sparsity. Experimental results show its accuracy to be comparable to that of much slower techniques. Hiromasa Arai, Crystal Maung, Haim Schweitzer |
ICTAI | 3 |
| 2016 | Unsupervised Feature Selection by Heuristic Search with Provable Bounds on SuboptimalityabstractIdentifying a small number of features that can represent the data is a known problem that comes up in areas such as machine learning, knowledge representation, data mining, and numerical linear algebra. Computing an optimal solution is believed to be NP-hard, and there is extensive work on approximation algorithms. Classic approaches exploit the algebraic structure of the underlying matrix, while more recent approaches use randomization. An entirely different approach that uses the A* heuristic search algorithm to find an optimal solution was recently proposed. Not surprisingly it is limited to effectively selecting only a small number of features. We propose a similar approach related to the Weighted A* algorithm. This gives algorithms that are not guaranteed to find an optimal solution but run much faster than the A* approach, enabling effective selection of many features from large datasets. We demonstrate experimentally that these new algorithms are more accurate than the current state-of-the-art while still being practical. Furthermore, they come with an adjustable guarantee on how different their error may be from the smallest possible (optimal) error. Their accuracy can always be increased at the expense of a longer running time. Hiromasa Arai, Crystal Maung, Haim Schweitzer |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2016 | Weighted A* Algorithms for Unsupervised Feature Selection with Provable Bounds on SuboptimalityabstractIdentifying a small number of features that can represent the data is believed to be NP-hard. Previous approaches exploit algebraic structure and use randomization. We propose an algorithm based on ideas similar to the Weighted A* algorithm in heuristic search. Our experiments show this new algorithm to be more accurate than the current state of the art. Hiromasa Arai, Crystal Maung, Haim Schweitzer |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2015 | Optimal Column Subset Selection by A-Star SearchabstractApproximating a matrix by a small subset of its columns is a known problem in numerical linear algebra. Algorithms that address this problem have been used in areas which include, among others, sparse approximation, unsupervised feature selection, data mining, and knowledge representation. Such algorithms were investigated since the 1960's, with recent results that use randomization. The problem is believed to be NP-Hard, and to the best of our knowledge there are no previously published algorithms aimed at computing optimal solutions. We show how to model the problem as a graph search, and propose a heuristic based on eigenvalues of related matrices. Applying the A* search strategy with this heuristic is guaranteed to find the optimal solution. Experimental results on common datasets show that the proposed algorithm can effectively select columns from moderate size matrices, typically improving by orders of magnitude the run time of exhaustive search. We also show how to combine the proposed algorithm with other non-optimal (but much faster) algorithms in a ``two stage'' framework, which is guaranteed to improve the accuracy of the other algorithms. Hiromasa Arai, Crystal Maung, Haim Schweitzer |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2015 | Improved Greedy Algorithms for Sparse Approximation of a Matrix in Terms of Another MatrixabstractWe consider simultaneously approximating all the columns of a data matrix in terms of few selected columns of another matrix that is sometimes called “the dictionary”. The challenge is to determine a small subset of the dictionary columns that can be used to obtain an accurate prediction of the entire data matrix. Previously proposed greedy algorithms for this task compare each data column with all dictionary columns, resulting in algorithms that may be too slow when both the data matrix and the dictionary matrix are large. A recent approach for accelerating the run time requires large amounts of memory to keep temporary values during the run of the algorithm. We propose two new algorithms that can be used even when both the data matrix and the dictionary matrix are large. The first algorithm is exact, with output identical to some previously proposed greedy algorithms. It takes significantly less memory when compared to the current state-of-the-art, and runs much faster when the dictionary matrix is sparse. The second algorithm uses a low rank approximation to the data matrix to further improve the run time. The algorithms use new recursive formulas for computing the greedy selection criterion. The formulas enable decoupling most of the computations related to the data matrix from the computations related to the dictionary matrix. Crystal Maung, Haim Schweitzer |
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. | 1 |
| 2013 | Pass-efficient unsupervised feature selectionabstractThe goal of unsupervised feature selection is to identify a small number of important features that can represent the data. We propose a new algorithm, a modification of the classical pivoted QR algorithm of Businger and Golub, that requires a small number of passes over the data. The improvements are based on two ideas: keeping track of multiple features in each pass, and skipping calculations that can be shown not to affect the final selection. Our algorithm selects the exact same features as the classical pivoted QR algorithm, and has the same favorable numerical stability. We describe experiments on real-world datasets which sometimes show improvements of {\em several orders of magnitude} over the classical algorithm. These results appear to be competitive with recently proposed randomized algorithms in terms of pass efficiency and run time. On the other hand, the randomized algorithms may produce better features, at the cost of small probability of failure. Crystal Maung, Haim Schweitzer |
NIPS | 1 |