Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Simon Egli

dblp:139/2724 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Vehicular, aerial and satellite networks · 61% Wireless networking · 39%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Vehicular, aerial and satellite networks
aerial networks
0.212013
Now or later?: delaying data transfer in time-critical aerial communication · CoNEXT 2013
Wireless networking › scheduling › network resource scheduling
file transfer scheduling
0.212013
Now or later?: delaying data transfer in time-critical aerial communication · CoNEXT 2013
Vehicular, aerial and satellite networks
UAV communication
0.212013
Now or later?: delaying data transfer in time-critical aerial communication · CoNEXT 2013
Wireless networking
wireless link
0.012013
Now or later?: delaying data transfer in time-critical aerial communication · CoNEXT 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 0.2empirical measurement · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Now or later?: delaying data transfer in time-critical aerial communication
abstract
Search and rescue missions are entering a new era with the advent of small scale unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) with communication capabilities and embedded cameras. Yet, delivering high resolution images of the supervised surface to rescuers is time-critical. To help resolving this problem, we study how UAVs can take advantage of their controlled mobility to derive the optimum strategy for data transmission. Driven by real-world aerial experiments with both airplanes and quadrocopters equipped with 802.11n technology, we show that the UAV should not necessarily transmit as soon as a wireless link is established. Instead, it should wait until it reaches a suitable distance to the receiving UAV, only to transmit when the time to move to the new location and transmit is minimal. We then apply the principle of delayed gratification, where the UAV attempts to solve the tradeoff between postponing until it reaches this minimum and the impatience to deliver as much data as soon as possible, before any physical damage on-the-fly may occur. Our empirical-driven simulations demonstrate that the optimal distance of transmission greatly depends on the interplay of actual throughput, data size, UAV cruise speed, and failure rate, and that state-of-the-art UAVs can already benefit from our approach.
Mahdi Asadpour, Domenico Giustiniano, Karin Anna Hummel, Simon Heimlicher, Simon Egli
CoNEXT5