Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nestoras Karathanasis
dblp:139/5652
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-4119-0851ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 6 · 4 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › RNA sequence analysis
microRNA analysis |
0.7 | 2 | 2021 | IsoMiRmap: fast, deterministic and exhaustive mining of isomiRs from short RNA-seq datasets · Bioinform. 2021 Don't use a cannon to kill the ... miRNA mosquito · Bioinform. 2014 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
transcriptomics |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | IsoMiRmap: fast, deterministic and exhaustive mining of isomiRs from short RNA-seq datasets · Bioinform. 2021 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › transcriptomics
RNA-seq analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | IsoMiRmap: fast, deterministic and exhaustive mining of isomiRs from short RNA-seq datasets · Bioinform. 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
short RNA-seq processing · 0.5deterministic sequence matching · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Ranking of cell clusters in a single-cell RNA-sequencing analysis framework using prior knowledgeabstractPrioritization or ranking of different cell types in a single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) framework can be performed in a variety of ways, some of these include: i) obtaining an indication of the proportion of cell types between the different conditions under study, ii) counting the number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between cell types and conditions in the experiment or, iii) prioritizing cell types based on prior knowledge about the conditions under study (i.e., a specific disease). These methods have drawbacks and limitations thus novel methods for improving cell ranking are required. Here we present a novel methodology that exploits prior knowledge in combination with expert-user information to accentuate cell types from a scRNA-seq analysis that yield the most biologically meaningful results with respect to a disease under study. Our methodology allows for ranking and prioritization of cell types based on how well their expression profiles relate to the molecular mechanisms and drugs associated with a disease. Molecular mechanisms, as well as drugs, are incorporated as prior knowledge in a standardized, structured manner. Cell types are then ranked/prioritized based on how well results from data-driven analysis of scRNA-seq data match the predefined prior knowledge. In additional cell-cell communication perturbations between disease and control networks are used to further prioritize/rank cell types. Our methodology has substantial advantages to more traditional cell ranking techniques and provides an informative complementary methodology that utilizes prior knowledge in a rapid and automated manner, that has previously not been attempted by other studies. The current methodology is also implemented as an R package entitled Single Cell Ranking Analysis Toolkit (scRANK) and is available for download and installation via GitHub (https://github.com/aoulas/scRANK). Anastasis Oulas, Kyriaki Savva, Nestoras Karathanasis, George M. Spyrou |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 3 |
| 2022 | Reproducibility efforts as a teaching tool: A pilot studyabstractThe "replication crisis" is a methodological problem in which many scientific research findings have been difficult or impossible to replicate. Because the reproducibility of empirical results is an essential aspect of the scientific method, such failures endanger the credibility of theories based on them and possibly significant portions of scientific knowledge. An instance of the replication crisis, analytic replication, pertains to reproducing published results through computational reanalysis of the authors' original data. However, direct replications are costly, time-consuming, and unrewarded in today's publishing standards. We propose that bioinformatics and computational biology students replicate recent discoveries as part of their curriculum. Considering the above, we performed a pilot study in one of the graduate-level courses we developed and taught at our University. The course is entitled Intro to R Programming and is meant for students in our Master's and PhD programs who have little to no programming skills. As the course emphasized real-world data analysis, we thought it would be an appropriate setting to carry out this study. The primary objective was to expose the students to real biological data analysis problems. These include locating and downloading the needed datasets, understanding any underlying conventions and annotations, understanding the analytical methods, and regenerating multiple graphs from their assigned article. The secondary goal was to determine whether the assigned articles contained sufficient information for a graduate-level student to replicate its figures. Overall, the students successfully reproduced 39% of the figures. The main obstacles were the need for more advanced programming skills and the incomplete documentation of the applied methods. Students were engaged, enthusiastic, and focused throughout the semester. We believe that this teaching approach will allow students to make fundamental scientific contributions under appropriate supervision. It will teach them about the scientific process, the importance of reporting standards, and the importance of openness. Nestoras Karathanasis, Daniel Hwang, Vibol Heng, Rimal Abhimannyu, Phillip Slogoff-Sevilla, Gina Buchel, Victoria Frisbie, Peiyao Li, Dafni Kryoneriti, Isidore Rigoutsos |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 1 |
| 2021 | IsoMiRmap: fast, deterministic and exhaustive mining of isomiRs from short RNA-seq datasetsabstractMOTIVATION: MicroRNA (miRNA) precursor arms give rise to multiple isoforms simultaneously called 'isomiRs.' IsomiRs from the same arm typically differ by a few nucleotides at either their 5' or 3' termini or both. In humans, the identities and abundances of isomiRs depend on a person's sex and genetic ancestry as well as on tissue type, tissue state and disease type/subtype. Moreover, nearly half of the time the most abundant isomiR differs from the miRNA sequence found in public databases. Accurate mining of isomiRs from deep sequencing data is thus important. RESULTS: We developed isoMiRmap, a fast, standalone, user-friendly mining tool that identifies and quantifies all isomiRs by directly processing short RNA-seq datasets. IsoMiRmap is a portable 'plug-and-play' tool, requires minimal setup, has modest computing and storage requirements, and can process an RNA-seq dataset with 50 million reads in just a few minutes on an average laptop. IsoMiRmap deterministically and exhaustively reports all isomiRs in a given deep sequencing dataset and quantifies them accurately (no double-counting). IsoMiRmap comprehensively reports all miRNA precursor locations from which an isomiR may be transcribed, tags as 'ambiguous' isomiRs whose sequences exist both inside and outside of the space of known miRNA sequences and reports the public identifiers of common single-nucleotide polymorphisms and documented somatic mutations that may be present in an isomiR. IsoMiRmap also identifies isomiRs with 3' non-templated post-transcriptional additions. Compared to similar tools, isoMiRmap is the fastest, reports more bona fide isomiRs, and provides the most comprehensive information related to an isomiR's transcriptional origin. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The codes for isoMiRmap are freely available at https://cm.jefferson.edu/isoMiRmap/ and https://github.com/TJU-CMC-Org/isoMiRmap/. IsomiR profiles for the datasets of the 1000 Genomes Project, spanning five population groups, and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), spanning 33 cancer studies, are also available at https://cm.jefferson.edu/isoMiRmap/. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Phillipe Loher, Nestoras Karathanasis, Eric Londin, Paul F. Bray, Venetia Pliatsika, Aristeidis G. Telonis, Isidore Rigoutsos |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2014 | Don't use a cannon to kill the ... miRNA mosquitoabstractAbstract Contact: [email protected] Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Nestoras Karathanasis, Ioannis Tsamardinos, Panayiota Poirazi |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2013 | A bioinformatics approach for investigating the determinants of Drosha processingabstractWe use a bioinformatics approach to search for the biological features that determine the cleavage site of the Microprocessor complex (or Drosha) within known miRNA hairpins. Towards this goal, we employ a previously developed methodology, termed DuplexSVM, which can accurately identify the four ends of a miRNA:miRNA* duplex. Here we use DuplexSVM to study how the Drosha determines its cleavage site. We perform in silico mutagenesis experiments on 142 hairpins by changing the distance of the Drosha site from the loop tip or the stem - single stranded tails junction by adding or removing matching nucleotides. Our results suggest that the Drosha cleavage site is mainly determined by its distance from the terminal loop tip. Nestoras Karathanasis, Ioannis Tsamardinos, Panayiota Poirazi |
BIBE | 1 |
| 2012 | SVM-based miRNA: MiRNA∗ duplex predictionabstractWe address the problem of predicting the miRNA: miRNA∗ duplex stemming from a microRNA (miRNA) hairpin precursor and we present a SVM-based methodology to address it. Predicting the miRNA: miRNA∗ duplex is a first step towards identifying the mature miRNA, suggesting possible miRNA targets and ultimately, reducing experimentation effort, time, and cost. We measure the error in terms of the absolute difference of the true and predicted location of all of the four ends of the duplex and/or of each end separately. Our mean absolute error over all ends is 1.61 ± 2.24 nts as measured on a hold-out set of 220 miRNA hairpin precursor sequences. In addition, our tool precisely predicts (with 0 nt deviation) the starting position for 57% and 52% of the miRNAs in the 5' and 3' strands of the same dataset, significantly outperforming the state-of-the-art tool MaturePred which achieves 18% and 12%, respectively, on the same task. Overall, our method accurately identifies not only the starting nucleotide of novel miRNA: miRNA∗ duplexes — and thus individual miRNAs- but also their length, while outperforming the current state-of-the-art tool. Nestoras Karathanasis, Ioannis Tsamardinos, Angelos P. Armen, Panayiota Poirazi |
BIBE | 1 |