Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

N. Fixot

dblp:139/7204 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1992
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Motion planning and robot control · 78% Robot navigation and mapping · 22%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › nonlinear control
nonlinear feedback control
0.011992
Trajectory tracking in robot manipulators via nonlinear estimated state feedback · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1992
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
trajectory tracking
0.011992
Trajectory tracking in robot manipulators via nonlinear estimated state feedback · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1992
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
adaptive control
0.011991
Adaptive control of robot manipulators via velocity estimated feedback · ICRA 1991
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.011991
Adaptive control of robot manipulators via velocity estimated feedback · ICRA 1991
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › state estimation › kinematic state estimation
velocity estimation
0.011991
Adaptive control of robot manipulators via velocity estimated feedback · ICRA 1991
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
manipulator control
0.011992
Trajectory tracking in robot manipulators via nonlinear estimated state feedback · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1992
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
state estimation
0.011992
Trajectory tracking in robot manipulators via nonlinear estimated state feedback · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1992

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

nonlinear observer design · 0.0lyapunov stability analysis · 0.0state-space feedback · 0.0sliding mode control · 0.0parameter adaptation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1992 Trajectory tracking in robot manipulators via nonlinear estimated state feedback
abstract
High-precision measurements of joint displacements are available on robot manipulators. In contrast, velocity measurements obtained through tachometers are, in many cases, contaminated by noise. It is therefore economically and technically interesting to investigate the possibility of controlling robot dynamics by only using angular position measurements. Two alternative approaches for trajectory tracking control via nonlinear estimated state feedback are presented. The first scheme is based on smooth functions, whereas the second uses switching gains. The stability of the closed-loop system is investigated. Both approaches yield exponentially stable closed-loop systems. The local attraction areas are characterized in terms of controller and observer gains, initial state values, and robot model parameters.>
Carlos Canudas-de-Wit, N. Fixot, Karl Johan Åström
IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom.2
1991 Adaptive control of robot manipulators via velocity estimated feedback
abstract
An approach for designing robust controllers via state-space feedback is presented. The robot model parameters are assumed to be unknown and velocity measurements are assumed to be unavailable. State observation and parameter adaptation are performed simultaneously. The adaptation law, the observer gains and the control law are designed on the reduced-order manifold which results from the invariance of the switching surface. With respect to the authors' previous work, the asymptotic stability of the closed-loop system resulting from the approach presented is not conditioned by a particular type of inertia matrix variations. On the other hand, the introduction of an adaptation loop may also be motivated by a reduction of chattering at control law level since the control law only depends on the estimated state and parameter vectors, and hence contains no terms proportional to discontinuities.>
Carlos Canudas-de-Wit, N. Fixot
ICRA2