Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
N. Fixot
dblp:139/7204
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1992
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Motion planning and robot control · 78% Robot navigation and mapping · 22% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › nonlinear control
nonlinear feedback control |
0.0 | 1 | 1992 | Trajectory tracking in robot manipulators via nonlinear estimated state feedback · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1992 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
trajectory tracking |
0.0 | 1 | 1992 | Trajectory tracking in robot manipulators via nonlinear estimated state feedback · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1992 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
adaptive control |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | Adaptive control of robot manipulators via velocity estimated feedback · ICRA 1991 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | Adaptive control of robot manipulators via velocity estimated feedback · ICRA 1991 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › state estimation › kinematic state estimation
velocity estimation |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | Adaptive control of robot manipulators via velocity estimated feedback · ICRA 1991 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
manipulator control |
0.0 | 1 | 1992 | Trajectory tracking in robot manipulators via nonlinear estimated state feedback · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1992 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
state estimation |
0.0 | 1 | 1992 | Trajectory tracking in robot manipulators via nonlinear estimated state feedback · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1992 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
nonlinear observer design · 0.0lyapunov stability analysis · 0.0state-space feedback · 0.0sliding mode control · 0.0parameter adaptation · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1992 | Trajectory tracking in robot manipulators via nonlinear estimated state feedbackabstractHigh-precision measurements of joint displacements are available on robot manipulators. In contrast, velocity measurements obtained through tachometers are, in many cases, contaminated by noise. It is therefore economically and technically interesting to investigate the possibility of controlling robot dynamics by only using angular position measurements. Two alternative approaches for trajectory tracking control via nonlinear estimated state feedback are presented. The first scheme is based on smooth functions, whereas the second uses switching gains. The stability of the closed-loop system is investigated. Both approaches yield exponentially stable closed-loop systems. The local attraction areas are characterized in terms of controller and observer gains, initial state values, and robot model parameters.> Carlos Canudas-de-Wit, N. Fixot, Karl Johan Åström |
IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. | 2 |
| 1991 | Adaptive control of robot manipulators via velocity estimated feedbackabstractAn approach for designing robust controllers via state-space feedback is presented. The robot model parameters are assumed to be unknown and velocity measurements are assumed to be unavailable. State observation and parameter adaptation are performed simultaneously. The adaptation law, the observer gains and the control law are designed on the reduced-order manifold which results from the invariance of the switching surface. With respect to the authors' previous work, the asymptotic stability of the closed-loop system resulting from the approach presented is not conditioned by a particular type of inertia matrix variations. On the other hand, the introduction of an adaptation loop may also be motivated by a reduction of chattering at control law level since the control law only depends on the estimated state and parameter vectors, and hence contains no terms proportional to discontinuities.> Carlos Canudas-de-Wit, N. Fixot |
ICRA | 2 |