Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Eric Max

dblp:139/7716 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1990
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization › scheduling
parallel machine scheduling
0.011990
Schedule generation and reconfiguration for parallel machines · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1990
Mathematical optimization › scheduling
production scheduling
0.011990
Schedule generation and reconfiguration for parallel machines · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1990
Mathematical optimization
lagrangian relaxation
0.021990
Schedule generation and reconfiguration for parallel machines · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1990
Schedule generation and reconfiguration for parallel machines · ICRA 1989
Mathematical optimization
discrete optimization
0.011989
Schedule generation and reconfiguration for parallel machines · ICRA 1989

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

lagrangian relaxation · 0.0near-optimal algorithm · 0.0heuristic · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1990 Schedule generation and reconfiguration for parallel machines
abstract
A methodology for scheduling independent jobs with due dates on identical, parallel machines is presented. The jobs have different levels of importance and various processing times on the machines, and the objective is to minimize the total weighted job tardiness of the schedule. Since the problem is NP hard, the goal is not to obtain the optimal schedule. Rather, an efficient near-optimal algorithm based on Lagrangian relaxation is presented. This approach provides a lower bound on the cost, which can be used as a measure of suboptimality. According to an implementation for a work center at Pratt and Whitney, most schedules generated are within 1% of the optima with reasonable CPU times. Furthermore, the method provides valuable job interaction information, which shop floor management uses to answer 'what if' questions, to reconfigure the schedule to accommodate dynamic changes, and to schedule new jobs.>
Peter B. Luh, Debra J. Hoitomt, Eric Max, Krishna R. Pattipati
IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom.3
1989 Schedule generation and reconfiguration for parallel machines
abstract
The authors present a methodology for scheduling independent jobs with due dates on identical parallel machines. The jobs have different levels of importance and various processing times on the machines, and the objective is to minimize the total weighted job tardiness of the schedule. Since the problem is NP-hard, the goal is not to obtain the optimal schedule. Rather, an efficient near-optimal algorithm based on Lagrangian relaxation is presented. A nice feature of this approach is that it provides a lower bound on the cost, which can be used as a measure of suboptimality. On most problems tested, results are within 1% of the optima and have reasonable CPU times. Furthermore, the method provides job interaction information, which is then used to provide quick answers to 'what if' questions, to reconfigure the schedule to accommodate dynamic changes, and also to schedule jobs.>
Peter B. Luh, Debra J. Hoitomt, Eric Max, Krishna R. Pattipati
ICRA3