Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ruizhe Li 0005

dblp:14/10102-5 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-4697-8947ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Knowledge graphs · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Efficient and distributed learning · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
knowledge distillation
1.012026
Error Correction in Radiology Reports: A Knowledge Distillation-Based Multi-Stage Framework · AAAI 2026
Medical and health informatics
clinical text processing
1.012026
Error Correction in Radiology Reports: A Knowledge Distillation-Based Multi-Stage Framework · AAAI 2026
Knowledge graphs
knowledge graph distillation
1.012026
Error Correction in Radiology Reports: A Knowledge Distillation-Based Multi-Stage Framework · AAAI 2026
Knowledge graphs › domain-specific knowledge graph
medical knowledge graph
1.012026
Error Correction in Radiology Reports: A Knowledge Distillation-Based Multi-Stage Framework · AAAI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multi-stage framework · 3.0large language model · 3.0external knowledge retrieval · 3.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Error Correction in Radiology Reports: A Knowledge Distillation-Based Multi-Stage Framework
abstract
The increasing complexity and workload of clinical radiology leads to inevitable oversights and mistakes in their use as diagnostic tools, causing delayed treatments and sometimes life-threatening harm to patients. While large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable progress in many tasks, their utilities in detecting and correcting errors in radiology reporting are limited. This paper proposes a novel dual-knowledge infusion framework that enhances LLMs' capability for radiology report proofreading through systematic integration of medical expertise. Specifically, the knowledge infusion combines medical knowledge graph distillation (MKGD) with external knowledge retrieval (EXKR), enabling an effective automated approach in tackling mistakes in radiology reporting. By decomposing the complex proofreading task into three specialized stages of detection, localization, and correction, our method mirrors the systematic review process employed by expert radiologists, ensuring both precision and clinical interpretability. To perform a robust, clinically relevant evaluation, a comprehensive benchmark is also proposed using real-world radiology reports with real-world error patterns, including speech recognition confusions, terminology ambiguities, and template-related inconsistencies. Extensive evaluations across multiple LLM architectures demonstrate substantial improvements of our approach: up to 31.56% increase in error detection accuracy and 37.4% reduction in processing time. Human evaluation by radiologists confirms superior clinical relevance and factual consistency compared to existing approaches.
Jinge Wu, Zhaolong Wu, Ruizhe Li 0005, Abul Hasan, Yunsoo Kim, Jason Pui Yin Cheung, Honghan Wu
AAAI3
2026 Extreme cardiac MRI analysis under respiratory motion: Results of the CMRxMotion challenge
Kang Wang 0017, Chen Qin, Zhang Shi, Haoran Wang 0009, Chen Chen 0042, Cheng Ouyang, Chengliang Dai, Yuanhan Mo, Chenchen Dai, Xutong Kuang, Ruizhe Li 0005, Xin Chen 0003, Xiuzheng Yue, Song Tian, Alejandro Mora-Rubio, Kumaradevan Punithakumar, Shizhan Gong, Qi Dou 0001, Sina Amirrajab, Yasmina Alkhalil, Cian M. Scannell, Lexiaozi Fan, Huili Yang, Xiaowu Sun, Rob J. van der Geest, Tewodros Weldebirhan Arega, Fabrice Mériaudeau, Caner Ozer, Amin Ranem, John Kalkhof, Ilkay Öksüz, Anirban Mukhopadhyay 0003, Abdul Qayyum 0002, Moona Mazher, Steven A. Niederer, Carles García-Cabrera, Eric Arazo Sanchez, Michal K. Grzeszczyk, Szymon Plotka, Wanqin Ma, Xiaomeng Li 0001, Rongjun Ge, Yongqing Kou, Xinrong Chen, He Wang 0016, Chengyan Wang, Wenjia Bai, Shuo Wang 0011
Medical Image Anal.12
2025 A survey of deep-learning-based radiology report generation using multimodal inputs
abstract
Automatic radiology report generation can alleviate the workload for physicians and minimize regional disparities in medical resources, therefore becoming an important topic in the medical image analysis field. It is a challenging task, as the computational model needs to mimic physicians to obtain information from multi-modal input data (i.e., medical images, clinical information, medical knowledge, etc.), and produce comprehensive and accurate reports. Recently, numerous works have emerged to address this issue using deep-learning-based methods, such as transformers, contrastive learning, and knowledge-base construction. This survey summarizes the key techniques developed in the most recent works and proposes a general workflow for deep-learning-based report generation with five main components, including multi-modality data acquisition, data preparation, feature learning, feature fusion and interaction, and report generation. The state-of-the-art methods for each of these components are highlighted. Additionally, we summarize the latest developments in large model-based methods and model explainability, along with public datasets, evaluation methods, current challenges, and future directions in this field. We have also conducted a quantitative comparison between different methods in the same experimental setting. This is the most up-to-date survey that focuses on multi-modality inputs and data fusion for radiology report generation. The aim is to provide comprehensive and rich information for researchers interested in automatic clinical report generation and medical image analysis, especially when using multimodal inputs, and to assist them in developing new algorithms to advance the field.
Grazziela Patrocinio Figueredo, Ruizhe Li 0005, Wei Zhang 0098, Weitong Chen 0001, Xin Chen 0003
Medical Image Anal.3
2019 FU-Net: Multi-class Image Segmentation Using Feedback Weighted U-Net
Mina Jafari, Ruizhe Li 0005, Yue Xing 0003, Dorothee Auer, Susan T. Francis, Jonathan M. Garibaldi, Xin Chen 0003
ICIG (2)2