Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Robert Petryszak

dblp:14/2491 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0001-6333-2182ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
bioinformatics infrastructure
0.412020
The ELIXIR Core Data Resources: fundamental infrastructure for the life sciences · Bioinform. 2020
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
gene expression quantification
0.312017
The RNASeq-er API - a gateway to systematically updated analysis of public RNA-seq data · Bioinform. 2017
Bioinformatics and computational biology › transcriptomics
RNA-seq analysis
0.312017
The RNASeq-er API - a gateway to systematically updated analysis of public RNA-seq data · Bioinform. 2017
Bioinformatics and computational biology › bioinformatics infrastructure
biological data management
0.112017
The RNASeq-er API - a gateway to systematically updated analysis of public RNA-seq data · Bioinform. 2017
Bioinformatics and computational biology
hierarchical clustering
0.112005
The predictive power of the CluSTr database · Bioinform. 2005
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein function prediction
protein classification
0.112005
The predictive power of the CluSTr database · Bioinform. 2005
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genome annotation
automatic annotation
0.012005
The predictive power of the CluSTr database · Bioinform. 2005
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein function prediction
0.012005
The predictive power of the CluSTr database · Bioinform. 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

ontology-based search · 0.3REST web service · 0.3smith-waterman algorithm · 0.1single-linkage clustering · 0.1monte carlo analysis · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 The ELIXIR Core Data Resources: fundamental infrastructure for the life sciences
abstract
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Rachel Drysdale, Charles E. Cook, Robert Petryszak, Vivienne Baillie Gerritsen, Mary Barlow, Elisabeth Gasteiger, Franziska Gruhl, Jerry Lanfear, Rodrigo Lopez, Nicole Redaschi, Heinz Stockinger, Daniel Teixeira, Aravind Venkatesan, Alex Bateman, Alan J. Bridge, Guy Cochrane, Robert D. Finn, Frank Oliver Glöckner, Marc Hanauer, Thomas M. Keane, Luana Licata, Per Oksvold, Sandra E. Orchard, Christine A. Orengo, Helen E. Parkinson, Bengt Persson, Pablo Porras, Jordi Rambla De Argila, Ana Rath, Charlotte Rodwell, Ugis Sarkans, Dietmar Schomburg, Ian Sillitoe, J. Dylan Spalding, Mathias Uhlen, Sameer Velankar, Juan Antonio Vizcaíno, Kalle von Feilitzen, Christian von Mering, Andy Yates, Niklas Blomberg, Christine Durinx, Johanna R. McEntyre
Bioinform.3
2017 The RNASeq-er API - a gateway to systematically updated analysis of public RNA-seq data
abstract
MOTIVATION: The exponential growth of publicly available RNA-sequencing (RNA-Seq) data poses an increasing challenge to researchers wishing to discover, analyse and store such data, particularly those based in institutions with limited computational resources. EMBL-EBI is in an ideal position to address these challenges and to allow the scientific community easy access to not just raw, but also processed RNA-Seq data. We present a Web service to access the results of a systematically and continually updated standardized alignment as well as gene and exon expression quantification of all public bulk (and in the near future also single-cell) RNA-Seq runs in 264 species in European Nucleotide Archive, using Representational State Transfer. RESULTS: The RNASeq-er API (Application Programming Interface) enables ontology-powered search for and retrieval of CRAM, bigwig and bedGraph files, gene and exon expression quantification matrices (Fragments Per Kilobase Of Exon Per Million Fragments Mapped, Transcripts Per Million, raw counts) as well as sample attributes annotated with ontology terms. To date over 270 00 RNA-Seq runs in nearly 10 000 studies (1PB of raw FASTQ data) in 264 species in ENA have been processed and made available via the API. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The RNASeq-er API can be accessed at http://www.ebi.ac.uk/fg/rnaseq/api . The commands used to analyse the data are available in supplementary materials and at https://github.com/nunofonseca/irap/wiki/iRAP-single-library . CONTACT: [email protected] ; [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Robert Petryszak, Nuno A. Fonseca, Anja Füllgrabe, Laura Huerta, Maria Keays, Y. Amy Tang, Alvis Brazma
Bioinform.1
2005 The predictive power of the CluSTr database
abstract
SUMMARY: The CluSTr database employs a fully automatic single-linkage hierarchical clustering method based on a similarity matrix. In order to compute the matrix, first all-against-all pair-wise comparisons between protein sequences are computed using the Smith-Waterman algorithm. The statistical significance of the similarity scores is then assessed using a Monte Carlo analysis, yielding Z-values, which are used to populate the matrix. This paper describes automated annotation experiments that quantify the predictive power and hence the biological relevance of the CluSTr data. The experiments utilized the UniProt data-mining framework to derive annotation predictions using combinations of InterPro and CluSTr. We show that this combination of data sources greatly increases the precision of predictions made by the data-mining framework, compared with the use of InterPro data alone. We conclude that the CluSTr approach to clustering proteins makes a valuable contribution to traditional protein classifications. AVAILABILITY: http://www.ebi.ac.uk/clustr/.
Robert Petryszak, Ernst Kretschmann, Daniela Wieser, Rolf Apweiler
Bioinform.1