Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lisa F. Rau

dblp:14/2539 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
13ranked-venue papers
8as first author
0since 2021 · last 1995
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 4 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 7 · 5 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
4 papers
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval
indexing
0.011991
Creating Segmented Databases from Free Text for Text Retrieval · SIGIR 1991
Information retrieval › indexing
text indexing
0.011991
Creating Segmented Databases from Free Text for Text Retrieval · SIGIR 1991
Information retrieval › text analysis
Natural language processing for IR
0.011988
Natural Language Techniques for Intelligent Information Retrieval · SIGIR 1988
Information retrieval › search engines › semantic search
conceptual retrieval
0.011987
Spontaneous Retrieval in a Conceptual Information System · IJCAI 1987
Information retrieval
retrieval models
0.011987
Information Retrieval from Never-Ending Stories · AAAI 1987

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

natural language processing · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1995 Automatic Condensation of Electronic Publications by Sentence Selection
R. Brandow, K. Mitze, Lisa F. Rau
Inf. Process. Manag.3
1993 Innovations in Text Interpretation
Paul S. Jacobs, Lisa F. Rau
Artif. Intell.2
1993 Calculating Salience and Breath of Knowledge
abstract
An overview is presented of recently completed research investigating three questions: what does it mean for a computer to know what it knows about? How can a computer construct a representation of what it knows about? How can such a representation be used for practical applications that advance the state-of-the-art in understanding the content of large databases?.>
Lisa F. Rau
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.1
1991 Creating Segmented Databases from Free Text for Text Retrieval
abstract
Indexing text for accurate retrieval ZS a dificuli and in)portant problem.. On-ltne information services generally depend on "keyword" mdtces rather ihat~other methods of retrieval, because of the pract~cal jealures of keywords for storage, dtssemtnatlonj and browsing m well as for
Lisa F. Rau, Paul S. Jacobs
SIGIR1
1990 The GE NLToolset: A Software Foundation for Intelligent Text Processing
Paul S. Jacobs, Lisa F. Rau
COLING2
1989 NL ∩ IR: Natural language for information retrieval
abstract
Neither natural language processing nor information retrieval is any longer a young field, but the two areas have yet to achieve a graceful interaction. Mainly, the reason for this incompatibility is that information retrieval technology depends upon relatively simple but robust methods, while natural language processing involves complex knowledge-based systems that have never approached robustness. We provide an analysis of areas in which natural language and information retrieval come together, and describe a system that joins the two fields by combining technology, choice of application area, and knowledge acquisition techniques.
Lisa F. Rau, Paul S. Jacobs
Int. J. Intell. Syst.1
1989 Information extraction and text summarization using linguistic knowledge acquisition
Lisa F. Rau, Paul S. Jacobs, Uri Zernik
Inf. Process. Manag.1
1988 Natural Language Techniques for Intelligent Information Retrieval
abstract
Neither natural language processing nor information retrieval is any longer a young field, but the two areas have yet to achieve a graceful interaction. Mainly, the reason for this incompatibility is that information retrieval technology depends upon relatively simple but robust methods, while natural language processing involves complex knowledge-based systems that have never approached robustness. We provide an analysis of areas in which natural language and information retrieval come together, and describe a system that joins the two fields by combining technology, choice of application area, and knowledge acquisition techniques.
Paul S. Jacobs, Lisa F. Rau
SIGIR2
1987 Information Retrieval from Never-Ending Stories
Lisa F. Rau
AAAI1
1987 Spontaneous Retrieval in a Conceptual Information System
Lisa F. Rau
IJCAI1
1987 Knowledge organization and access in a conceptual information system
Lisa F. Rau
Inf. Process. Manag.1
1986 Generalization-Based Retrieval
Lisa F. Rau
ECAI1
1984 Ace: Associating Language with Meaning
Paul S. Jacobs, Lisa F. Rau
ECAI2