Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
D. B. Urfrig
dblp:14/3057
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1975
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software testing · 56% Requirements engineering and software design · 44% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Requirements engineering and software design › software design evaluation
design error detection |
0.0 | 1 | 1975 | Some Experience with Automated Aids to the Design of Large-Scale Reliable Software · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1975 |
Software testing › fault analysis
software error analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 1975 | Some Experience with Automated Aids to the Design of Large-Scale Reliable Software · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1975 |
Software testing › automated testing
automated testing tools |
0.0 | 1 | 1975 | Some Experience with Automated Aids to the Design of Large-Scale Reliable Software · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1975 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
observational study · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1975 | Some Experience with Automated Aids to the Design of Large-Scale Reliable SoftwareabstractSummarizes some recent experience in analyzing and eliminating sources of error in the design phase of large software projects. It points out some of the significant differences in software error incidence between large and small software projects. A taxonomy of software error causes, and some analyses of the design error data performed to obtain a better understanding of the nature of large-scale software design errors and to evaluate alternative methods of preventing, detecting, and eliminating them are presented. Based on this analysis of observational data, a hypothesis was derived regarding the potential cost effectiveness of an automated aid to detecting inconsistencies between assertions about the nature of inputs and outputs of the various elements of the software design. Barry W. Boehm, Robert K. McClean, D. B. Urfrig |
IEEE Trans. Software Eng. | 3 |