Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Edward P. Hsieh
dblp:14/3561
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1973
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers |
Electronic design automation · 59% Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 28% Memory systems · 12% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Automata and formal languages · 100% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test |
0.0 | 2 | 1971 | Checking Experiments ror Sequential Machines · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971 Algorithms for Detection of Faults in Logic Circuits · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971 |
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › error correction
error-correcting codes |
0.0 | 1 | 1973 | Modeling of a Bubble-Memory Organization with Self-Checking Translators to Achieve High Reliability · IEEE Trans. Computers 1973 |
Memory systems › magnetic memory
magnetic bubble memory |
0.0 | 1 | 1973 | Modeling of a Bubble-Memory Organization with Self-Checking Translators to Achieve High Reliability · IEEE Trans. Computers 1973 |
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
memory fault tolerance |
0.0 | 1 | 1973 | Modeling of a Bubble-Memory Organization with Self-Checking Translators to Achieve High Reliability · IEEE Trans. Computers 1973 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
sequential circuit testing |
0.0 | 2 | 1971 | Checking Experiments ror Sequential Machines · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971 Algorithms for Detection of Faults in Logic Circuits · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › sequential circuit testing
checking experiments |
0.0 | 1 | 1971 | Checking Experiments ror Sequential Machines · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
fault simulation |
0.0 | 1 | 1971 | Algorithms for Detection of Faults in Logic Circuits · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
test generation |
0.0 | 1 | 1971 | Algorithms for Detection of Faults in Logic Circuits · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971 |
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
reliability modeling |
0.0 | 1 | 1973 | Modeling of a Bubble-Memory Organization with Self-Checking Translators to Achieve High Reliability · IEEE Trans. Computers 1973 |
Automata and formal languages › finite automata
sequential machines |
0.0 | 1 | 1971 | Checking Experiments ror Sequential Machines · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
self-checking circuit design · 0.0error-correcting codes · 0.0state counting method · 0.0resolving sequence · 0.0macroblock test generation · 0.0iterative test generation · 0.0d-notation · 0.0compound DS · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1973 | Modeling of a Bubble-Memory Organization with Self-Checking Translators to Achieve High ReliabilityabstractThis paper reports a study on the design and modeling of a highly reliable bubble-memory system. This system has the capability of correcting a single 16-adjacent bit-group error resulting from failures in a single basic storage module (BSM), and detecting with a probability greater than 0.99 any double errors resulting from failures in BSM's. The encoding/decoding network (memory translator) is designed to be self-checking, i.e., a single circuit failure in the translator wiH not produce an erroneous output that goes undetected. The system is able to perform reliable configuration in the event of uncorrectable BSM failures, memory translator failures, and dual-memory buffer failures; even in the presence of a single failure in the status registers controlling the configuration network. The bubble memory under study permits serial accessing of the store with 64 x 1024 bit blocks at a 100-kHz rate. The objective of this study is to develop good fault-tolerant design and analysis methods adequate for newly emerging technologies and prove the practicality by example. The reliability modeling study justifies the design philosophy adopted of employing memory data encoding and a translator to correct single group errors and detect double group errors to enhance the overall system reliability. By a proper design of the memory translator based on a new checking technique, a uniformly high percentage of multiple b-adjacent bit-group error detection is achieved through the use of a proposed code (detects 99.99695 percent of double b-adjacent bit-group errors and 99.9985 percent of triple or more b-adjacent bit-group errors). Willard G. Bouricius, William C. Carter, Edward P. Hsieh, Donald C. Jessep Jr., Aspi B. Wadia |
IEEE Trans. Computers | 3 |
| 1971 | Algorithms for Detection of Faults in Logic CircuitsabstractProgrammed algorithms for test generation and test evaluation are described. The D-notation is introduced and a test generator (DALG) for combinational logic is presented. The sequential case is then examined. "Real life" constraints related to LSI testing are discussed. Two heuristic test generators satisfying these constraints are introduced. The iterative test generator (ITG) generates tests by transforming the given sequential circuit into an iterative combinational circuit. The macroblock test generator (MTG) uses the same approach but makes use of complex primitives (latches, triggers, etc.) to represent the circuit to be tested. Both the ITG and the MTG are not always guaranteed to generate good tests for each examined failure, and are used in connection with a test evaluator (simulator). Basic features of this evaluator are discussed. Willard G. Bouricius, Edward P. Hsieh, Gianfranco R. Putzolu, J. Paul Roth, Peter R. Schneider, Chung-Jen Tan |
IEEE Trans. Computers | 2 |
| 1971 | Checking Experiments ror Sequential MachinesabstractSome new procedures for designing efficient checking experiments for sequential machines are described. These procedures are based on the use of four types of sequences introduced, namely, the compound DS, the resolving sequence (RS), the compound. RS, and the simple I/O sequence. Significant reduction in the bound on the length of checking experiments is achieved. Along a parallel line of development, a new procedure, called the state counting method, is presented for detecting faults that can cause an increase in the number of states. For an n-state, m-input symbol machine, this procedure gives a bound on the length of checking experiments that is approximately mΔn. n times the bound for conventional checking experiments designed strictly under the assumption that no faults increase the number of states, where m > 1 and Δn is the maximum anticipated increase in the number of states due to faults. Edward P. Hsieh |
IEEE Trans. Computers | 1 |