Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Edward P. Hsieh

dblp:14/3561 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1973
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers
Electronic design automation · 59% Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 28% Memory systems · 12%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automata and formal languages · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test
0.021971
Checking Experiments ror Sequential Machines · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971
Algorithms for Detection of Faults in Logic Circuits · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › error correction
error-correcting codes
0.011973
Modeling of a Bubble-Memory Organization with Self-Checking Translators to Achieve High Reliability · IEEE Trans. Computers 1973
Memory systems › magnetic memory
magnetic bubble memory
0.011973
Modeling of a Bubble-Memory Organization with Self-Checking Translators to Achieve High Reliability · IEEE Trans. Computers 1973
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
memory fault tolerance
0.011973
Modeling of a Bubble-Memory Organization with Self-Checking Translators to Achieve High Reliability · IEEE Trans. Computers 1973
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
sequential circuit testing
0.021971
Checking Experiments ror Sequential Machines · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971
Algorithms for Detection of Faults in Logic Circuits · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › sequential circuit testing
checking experiments
0.011971
Checking Experiments ror Sequential Machines · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
fault simulation
0.011971
Algorithms for Detection of Faults in Logic Circuits · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
test generation
0.011971
Algorithms for Detection of Faults in Logic Circuits · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
reliability modeling
0.011973
Modeling of a Bubble-Memory Organization with Self-Checking Translators to Achieve High Reliability · IEEE Trans. Computers 1973
Automata and formal languages › finite automata
sequential machines
0.011971
Checking Experiments ror Sequential Machines · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

self-checking circuit design · 0.0error-correcting codes · 0.0state counting method · 0.0resolving sequence · 0.0macroblock test generation · 0.0iterative test generation · 0.0d-notation · 0.0compound DS · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1973 Modeling of a Bubble-Memory Organization with Self-Checking Translators to Achieve High Reliability
abstract
This paper reports a study on the design and modeling of a highly reliable bubble-memory system. This system has the capability of correcting a single 16-adjacent bit-group error resulting from failures in a single basic storage module (BSM), and detecting with a probability greater than 0.99 any double errors resulting from failures in BSM's. The encoding/decoding network (memory translator) is designed to be self-checking, i.e., a single circuit failure in the translator wiH not produce an erroneous output that goes undetected. The system is able to perform reliable configuration in the event of uncorrectable BSM failures, memory translator failures, and dual-memory buffer failures; even in the presence of a single failure in the status registers controlling the configuration network. The bubble memory under study permits serial accessing of the store with 64 x 1024 bit blocks at a 100-kHz rate. The objective of this study is to develop good fault-tolerant design and analysis methods adequate for newly emerging technologies and prove the practicality by example. The reliability modeling study justifies the design philosophy adopted of employing memory data encoding and a translator to correct single group errors and detect double group errors to enhance the overall system reliability. By a proper design of the memory translator based on a new checking technique, a uniformly high percentage of multiple b-adjacent bit-group error detection is achieved through the use of a proposed code (detects 99.99695 percent of double b-adjacent bit-group errors and 99.9985 percent of triple or more b-adjacent bit-group errors).
Willard G. Bouricius, William C. Carter, Edward P. Hsieh, Donald C. Jessep Jr., Aspi B. Wadia
IEEE Trans. Computers3
1971 Algorithms for Detection of Faults in Logic Circuits
abstract
Programmed algorithms for test generation and test evaluation are described. The D-notation is introduced and a test generator (DALG) for combinational logic is presented. The sequential case is then examined. "Real life" constraints related to LSI testing are discussed. Two heuristic test generators satisfying these constraints are introduced. The iterative test generator (ITG) generates tests by transforming the given sequential circuit into an iterative combinational circuit. The macroblock test generator (MTG) uses the same approach but makes use of complex primitives (latches, triggers, etc.) to represent the circuit to be tested. Both the ITG and the MTG are not always guaranteed to generate good tests for each examined failure, and are used in connection with a test evaluator (simulator). Basic features of this evaluator are discussed.
Willard G. Bouricius, Edward P. Hsieh, Gianfranco R. Putzolu, J. Paul Roth, Peter R. Schneider, Chung-Jen Tan
IEEE Trans. Computers2
1971 Checking Experiments ror Sequential Machines
abstract
Some new procedures for designing efficient checking experiments for sequential machines are described. These procedures are based on the use of four types of sequences introduced, namely, the compound DS, the resolving sequence (RS), the compound. RS, and the simple I/O sequence. Significant reduction in the bound on the length of checking experiments is achieved. Along a parallel line of development, a new procedure, called the state counting method, is presented for detecting faults that can cause an increase in the number of states. For an n-state, m-input symbol machine, this procedure gives a bound on the length of checking experiments that is approximately mΔn. n times the bound for conventional checking experiments designed strictly under the assumption that no faults increase the number of states, where m > 1 and Δn is the maximum anticipated increase in the number of states due to faults.
Edward P. Hsieh
IEEE Trans. Computers1