Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Phil Hontalas
dblp:14/3625
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1989
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 70% Parallel and multicore computing · 30% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Parallel and multicore computing › synchronization
optimistic synchronization |
0.0 | 1 | 1987 | Distributed Simulation and the Time Wrap Operating System · SOSP 1987 |
Performance modeling and evaluation › simulation › discrete-event simulation
parallel discrete event simulation |
0.0 | 1 | 1987 | Distributed Simulation and the Time Wrap Operating System · SOSP 1987 |
Performance modeling and evaluation › simulation › discrete-event simulation › parallel discrete event simulation › optimistic simulation
time warp |
0.0 | 1 | 1987 | Distributed Simulation and the Time Wrap Operating System · SOSP 1987 |
Performance modeling and evaluation › simulation › parallel and distributed simulation
distributed simulation |
0.0 | 1 | 1987 | Distributed Simulation and the Time Wrap Operating System · SOSP 1987 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
virtual time synchronization · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1989 | The Performance of a Distributed Combat Simulation with the Time Warp Operating SystemabstractAbstract This paper analyzes the performance of a discrete‐event combat simulation executed on a parallel processor under control of the Time Warp Operating System. Time Warp is in a class of distributed simulation methods called Optimistic methods which have proven to be useful over a wide range of simulations. The combat simulation used for this performance study, called STB88, is a division‐corps model incorporating a number of different types of computations. The speed‐up for three versions of this model on the Caltech/JPL Mark III Hypercube and the BBN Butterfly parallel processors was measured relative to an efficient sequential execution of the same model on the same hardware. The results indicate that STB88 version 1 achieves a speed‐up of 28.6 on 60 Mark III processors, while STB88 version 2 achieves a speed‐up of 36.8 on 100 Butterfly processors. Version 3 of STB88 achieved a speed‐up of 38.5 on 128 Mark III processors. The versions differed only in their interface to Time Warp. On the Butterfly, the sequential execution completed in 2 hours, while the 100 processor execution completed in 3.2 minutes. Frederick Wieland, L. Hayley, A. Feinberg, Mike Di Loreto, Leo Blume, J. Ruffles, Peter L. Reiher, Brian Beckman, Phil Hontalas, Steve Bellenot, David R. Jefferson |
Concurr. Pract. Exp. | 9 |
| 1987 | Distributed Simulation and the Time Wrap Operating SystemabstractThis paper describes the Time Warp Operating System, under development for three years at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory for the Caltech Mark III Hypercube multi-processor. Its primary goal is concurrent execution of large, irregular discrete event simulations at maximum speed. It also supports any other distributed applications that are synchronized by virtual time. David R. Jefferson, Brian Beckman, Frederick Wieland, Leo Blume, Mike Di Loreto, Phil Hontalas, Pierre Laroche, Kathy Sturdevant, Jack Tupman, L. Van Warren, John J. Wedel, Herb Younger, Steve Bellenot |
SOSP | 6 |