Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sumedha

dblp:14/4145 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-0085-7632ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Approximation and online algorithms · 50% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 25% Computational complexity · 25%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation algorithms
0.912025
On the Complexity of Telephone Broadcasting from Cacti to Bounded Pathwidth Graphs · ICALP 2025
Approximation and online algorithms › approximation algorithms
constant-factor approximation
0.912025
On the Complexity of Telephone Broadcasting from Cacti to Bounded Pathwidth Graphs · ICALP 2025
Graph algorithms and graph theory › network analysis › network diffusion
telephone broadcast
0.912025
On the Complexity of Telephone Broadcasting from Cacti to Bounded Pathwidth Graphs · ICALP 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis
0.112007
Clustering by soft-constraint affinity propagation: applications to gene-expression data · Bioinform. 2007
Data mining › clustering › exemplar-based clustering
affinity propagation
0.012007
Clustering by soft-constraint affinity propagation: applications to gene-expression data · Bioinform. 2007
Data mining
clustering
0.012007
Clustering by soft-constraint affinity propagation: applications to gene-expression data · Bioinform. 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

message passing · 0.1affinity propagation · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 On the Complexity of Telephone Broadcasting from Cacti to Bounded Pathwidth Graphs
abstract
In Telephone Broadcasting, the goal is to disseminate a message from a given source vertex of an input graph to all other vertices in the minimum number of rounds, where at each round, an informed vertex can send the message to at most one of its uninformed neighbors. For general graphs of n vertices, the problem is NP-complete, and the best existing algorithm has an approximation factor of 𝒪(log n/ log log n). The existence of a constant factor approximation for the general graphs is still unknown. In this paper, we study the problem in two simple families of sparse graphs, namely, cacti and graphs of bounded pathwidth. There have been several efforts to understand the complexity of the problem in cactus graphs, mostly establishing the presence of polynomial-time solutions for restricted families of cactus graphs (e.g., [Čevnik and Žerovnik, 2017; Ehresmann, 2021; Harutyunyan et al., 2009; Harutyunyan and Maraachlian, 2007; Harutyunyan and Maraachlian, 2008; Harutyunyan et al., 2023]). Despite these efforts, the complexity of the problem in arbitrary cactus graphs remained open. We settle this question by establishing the NP-completeness of telephone broadcasting in cactus graphs. For that, we show the problem is NP-complete in a simple subfamily of cactus graphs, which we call snowflake graphs. These graphs are not only cacti but also have pathwidth 2. These results establish that, despite being polynomial-time solvable in trees, the problem becomes NP-complete in very simple extensions of trees. On the positive side, we present constant-factor approximation algorithms for the studied families of graphs, namely, an algorithm with an approximation factor of 2 for cactus graphs and an approximation factor of 𝒪(1) for graphs of bounded pathwidth.
Aida Aminian, Shahin Kamali, Seyed-Mohammad Seyed-Javadi, Sumedha
ICALP4
2007 Clustering by soft-constraint affinity propagation: applications to gene-expression data
abstract
MOTIVATION: Similarity-measure-based clustering is a crucial problem appearing throughout scientific data analysis. Recently, a powerful new algorithm called Affinity Propagation (AP) based on message-passing techniques was proposed by Frey and Dueck (2007a). In AP, each cluster is identified by a common exemplar all other data points of the same cluster refer to, and exemplars have to refer to themselves. Albeit its proved power, AP in its present form suffers from a number of drawbacks. The hard constraint of having exactly one exemplar per cluster restricts AP to classes of regularly shaped clusters, and leads to suboptimal performance, e.g. in analyzing gene expression data. RESULTS: This limitation can be overcome by relaxing the AP hard constraints. A new parameter controls the importance of the constraints compared to the aim of maximizing the overall similarity, and allows to interpolate between the simple case where each data point selects its closest neighbor as an exemplar and the original AP. The resulting soft-constraint affinity propagation (SCAP) becomes more informative, accurate and leads to more stable clustering. Even though a new a priori free parameter is introduced, the overall dependence of the algorithm on external tuning is reduced, as robustness is increased and an optimal strategy for parameter selection emerges more naturally. SCAP is tested on biological benchmark data, including in particular microarray data related to various cancer types. We show that the algorithm efficiently unveils the hierarchical cluster structure present in the data sets. Further on, it allows to extract sparse gene expression signatures for each cluster.
Michele Leone, Sumedha, Martin Weigt
Bioinform.2