Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Riccardo Farina

dblp:14/4314 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
0009-0006-4693-7036ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Systems, architecture and hardware · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Motion planning and robot control · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › nonlinear control
input-output linearization
0.112005
On the Control of Robots with Visco-Elastic Joints · ICRA 2005
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.112005
On the Control of Robots with Visco-Elastic Joints · ICRA 2005
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
trajectory tracking
0.112005
On the Control of Robots with Visco-Elastic Joints · ICRA 2005
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › trajectory planning
trajectory time scaling
0.012002
Dynamic Scaling of Trajectories for Robots with Elastic Joints · ICRA 2002
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot dynamics
inverse dynamics
0.012002
Dynamic Scaling of Trajectories for Robots with Elastic Joints · ICRA 2002
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot dynamics
0.012002
Dynamic Scaling of Trajectories for Robots with Elastic Joints · ICRA 2002

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

static state feedback · 0.1nonlinear dynamic state feedback · 0.1quartic polynomial equation · 0.0biquadratic equation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2005 On the Control of Robots with Visco-Elastic Joints
abstract
Feedback linearization is a viable nonlinear control technique for solving trajectory tracking problems in robots with (and without) elastic joints. However, the additional presence of dissipative effects due to joint viscosity destroys full state feedback linearizability. For robots with visco-elastic joints, the use of a static state feedback can achieve at most input-output linearization and decoupling, since an internal nonlinear dynamics is left in the closed-loop system. Although the stability properties of this unobservable dynamics still guarantee perfect output tracking in nominal conditions, control design based on static feedback becomes ill-conditioned as joint viscosity decreases. Instead, resorting to a nonlinear dynamic state feedback leads to the same closed-loop properties, but with a regularized control effort for any level of joint viscosity and elasticity. Static and dynamic nonlinear feedback control designs are presented for a reduced and a complete dynamic model of visco-elastic joint robots. A numerical comparison on a simple case study illustrates the benefits of the dynamic input-output linearization approach.
Alessandro De Luca 0001, Riccardo Farina, Pasquale Lucibello
ICRA2
2002 Dynamic Scaling of Trajectories for Robots with Elastic Joints
abstract
The classical dynamic scaling property of robot trajectories is analyzed in the case of presence of elastic transmissions. We present a technique for recovering the fastest motion under torque constraints, when uniform time scaling is used along a given path. The scaling algorithm is based on the solution of a complete quartic polynomial equation, which reduces to a biquadratic one in the absence of viscous friction. Consequences on the organization of inverse dynamics computation are pointed out. Numerical results are reported for a planar 2R arm, illustrating the differences that arise with respect to the fully rigid case.
Alessandro De Luca 0001, Riccardo Farina
ICRA2