Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Vimal Thilak

dblp:14/4821 · also Thilakam Vimal Thilak Krishna · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
3as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Representation and self-supervised learning · 31% Deep learning architectures and training · 20% Efficient and distributed learning · 20%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Computational photography and imaging · 87% Image and video processing · 13%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
mixture of experts
0.912025
Parameters vs FLOPs: Scaling Laws for Optimal Sparsity for Mixture-of-Experts Language Models · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › large-scale learning
model scaling
0.912025
Parameters vs FLOPs: Scaling Laws for Optimal Sparsity for Mixture-of-Experts Language Models · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory
implicit bias
0.812024
How JEPA Avoids Noisy Features: The Implicit Bias of Deep Linear Self Distillation Networks · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › embedding learning › joint embedding
joint embedding architecture
0.812024
LiDAR: Sensing Linear Probing Performance in Joint Embedding SSL Architectures · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › self-supervised representation learning › predictive learning
joint-embedding predictive architecture
0.812024
How JEPA Avoids Noisy Features: The Implicit Bias of Deep Linear Self Distillation Networks · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
policy gradient
0.812024
Vanishing Gradients in Reinforcement Finetuning of Language Models · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reinforcement learning for NLP
reinforcement fine-tuning
0.812024
Vanishing Gradients in Reinforcement Finetuning of Language Models · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation analysis
representation evaluation
0.812024
LiDAR: Sensing Linear Probing Performance in Joint Embedding SSL Architectures · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › knowledge distillation
self-distillation
0.812024
How JEPA Avoids Noisy Features: The Implicit Bias of Deep Linear Self Distillation Networks · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › training dynamics
vanishing gradient
0.812024
Vanishing Gradients in Reinforcement Finetuning of Language Models · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › self-supervised representation learning
masked autoencoder
0.212024
How JEPA Avoids Noisy Features: The Implicit Bias of Deep Linear Self Distillation Networks · NeurIPS 2024
Computational photography and imaging › physics-based vision
material classification
0.112011
Passive Polarimetric Imagery-Based Material Classification Robust to Illumination Source Position and Viewpoint · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2011
Computational photography and imaging
polarization imaging
0.112011
Passive Polarimetric Imagery-Based Material Classification Robust to Illumination Source Position and Viewpoint · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sparsity analysis · 0.9scaling laws · 0.9supervised fine-tuning · 0.8self-supervised learning · 0.8linear discriminant analysis · 0.8deep linear network analysis · 0.8model-based estimation · 0.1complex index of refraction estimation · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Towards Automatic Assessment of Self-Supervised Speech Models using Rank
abstract
This study explores using embedding rank as an unsupervised evaluation metric for general-purpose speech encoders trained via self-supervised learning (SSL). Traditionally, assessing the performance of these encoders is resource-intensive and requires labeled data from the downstream tasks. Inspired by the vision domain, where embedding rank has shown promise for evaluating image encoders without tuning on labeled downstream data, this work examines its applicability in the speech domain, considering the temporal nature of the signals. The findings indicate rank correlates with downstream performance within encoder layers across various downstream tasks and for in- and out-of-domain scenarios. However, rank does not reliably predict the best-performing layer for specific downstream tasks, as lower-ranked layers can outperform higher-ranked ones. Despite this limitation, the results suggest that embedding rank can be a valuable tool for monitoring training progress in SSL speech models, offering a less resource-demanding alternative to traditional evaluation methods.
Zakaria Aldeneh, Vimal Thilak, Takuya Higuchi, Barry-John Theobald, Tatiana Likhomanenko
ICASSP2
2025 Parameters vs FLOPs: Scaling Laws for Optimal Sparsity for Mixture-of-Experts Language Models
abstract
Scaling the capacity of language models has consistently proven to be a reliable approach for improving performance and unlocking new capabilities. Capacity can be primarily defined by two dimensions: the number of model parameters and the compute per example. While scaling typically involves increasing both, the precise interplay between these factors and their combined contribution to overall capacity remains not fully understood. We explore this relationship in the context of sparse Mixture-of-Expert models (MoEs), which allow scaling the number of parameters without proportionally increasing the FLOPs per example. We investigate how varying the sparsity level, i.e., the ratio of non-active to total parameters, affects model performance in terms of both pretraining and downstream performance. We find that under different constraints (e.g. parameter size and total training compute), there is an optimal level of sparsity that improves both training efficiency and model performance.These results provide a better understanding of the impact of sparsity in scaling laws for MoEs and complement existing works in this area, offering insights for designing more efficient architectures.
Samira Abnar, Harshay Shah, Dan Busbridge, Alaaeldin El-Nouby, Joshua M. Susskind, Vimal Thilak
ICML6
2024 Vanishing Gradients in Reinforcement Finetuning of Language Models
abstract
Pretrained language models are commonly aligned with human preferences and downstream tasks via reinforcement finetuning (RFT), which refers to maximizing a (possibly learned) reward function using policy gradient algorithms. This work identifies a fundamental optimization obstacle in RFT: we prove that the expected gradient for an input vanishes when its reward standard deviation under the model is small, even if the expected reward is far from optimal. Through experiments on an RFT benchmark and controlled environments, as well as a theoretical analysis, we then demonstrate that vanishing gradients due to small reward standard deviation are prevalent and detrimental, leading to extremely slow reward maximization. Lastly, we explore ways to overcome vanishing gradients in RFT. We find the common practice of an initial supervised finetuning (SFT) phase to be the most promising candidate, which sheds light on its importance in an RFT pipeline. Moreover, we show that a relatively small number of SFT optimization steps on as few as 1% of the input samples can suffice, indicating that the initial SFT phase need not be expensive in terms of compute and data labeling efforts. Overall, our results emphasize that being mindful for inputs whose expected gradient vanishes, as measured by the reward standard deviation, is crucial for successful execution of RFT.
Noam Razin, Hattie Zhou, Omid Saremi, Vimal Thilak, Arwen Bradley, Preetum Nakkiran, Joshua M. Susskind, Etai Littwin
ICLR4
2024 LiDAR: Sensing Linear Probing Performance in Joint Embedding SSL Architectures
abstract
Joint embedding (JE) architectures have emerged as a promising avenue for ac- quiring transferable data representations. A key obstacle to using JE methods, however, is the inherent challenge of evaluating learned representations without access to a downstream task, and an annotated dataset. Without efficient and re- liable evaluation, it is difficult to iterate on architectural and training choices for JE methods. In this paper, we introduce LiDAR (Linear Discriminant Analysis Rank), a metric designed to measure the quality of representations within JE archi- tectures. Our metric addresses several shortcomings of recent approaches based on feature covariance rank by discriminating between informative and uninforma- tive features. In essence, LiDAR quantifies the rank of the Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) matrix associated with the surrogate SSL task—a measure that intuitively captures the information content as it pertains to solving the SSL task. We empirically demonstrate that LiDAR significantly surpasses naive rank based approaches in its predictive power of optimal hyperparameters. Our proposed cri- terion presents a more robust and intuitive means of assessing the quality of rep- resentations within JE architectures, which we hope facilitates broader adoption of these powerful techniques in various domains.
Vimal Thilak, Chen Huang 0001, Omid Saremi, Laurent Dinh, Hanlin Goh, Preetum Nakkiran, Joshua M. Susskind, Etai Littwin
ICLR1
2024 How JEPA Avoids Noisy Features: The Implicit Bias of Deep Linear Self Distillation Networks
abstract
Two competing paradigms exist for self-supervised learning of data representations. Joint Embedding Predictive Architectures (JEPAs) is a class of architectures in which semantically similar inputs are encoded into representations that are predictive of each other. A recent successful approach that falls under the JEPA framework is self-distillation, where an online encoder is trained to predict the output of the target encoder, sometimes with a lightweight predictor network. This is contrasted with the Masked Auto Encoder (MAE) paradigm, where an encoder and decoder are trained to reconstruct missing parts of the input in ambient space rather than its latent representation. A common motivation for using the JEPA approach over MAE is that the JEPA objective prioritizes abstract features over fine-grained pixel information (which can be unpredictable and uninformative). In this work, we seek to understand the mechanism behind this empirical observation by analyzing deep linear models. We uncover a surprising mechanism: in a simplified linear setting where both approaches learn similar representations, JEPAs are biased to learn high influence features, or features characterized by having high regression coefficients. Our results point to a distinct implicit bias of predicting in latent space that may shed light on its success in practice.
Etai Littwin, Omid Saremi, Madhu Advani, Vimal Thilak, Preetum Nakkiran, Chen Huang 0001, Joshua M. Susskind
NeurIPS4
2011 Passive Polarimetric Imagery-Based Material Classification Robust to Illumination Source Position and Viewpoint
abstract
Polarization, a property of light that conveys information about the transverse electric field orientation, complements other attributes of electromagnetic radiation such as intensity and frequency. Using multiple passive polarimetric images, we develop an iterative, model-based approach to estimate the complex index of refraction and apply it to target classification.
Vimal Thilak, Charles D. Creusere, David G. Voelz
IEEE Trans. Image Process.1
2007 Material Classification using Passive Polarimetric Imagery
abstract
Passive imaging polarimetry has emerged as an useful tool in many remote sensing applications including material classification, target detection and shape extraction. In this paper we present a method to classify specular objects based on their material composition from passive polarimetric imagery. The proposed algorithm is built on an iterative model-based method to recover the complex index of refraction of a specular target from multiple polarization measurements. The recovered parameters are then used to discriminate between objects by employing the nearest neighbor rule. The effectiveness of the proposed method is validated with data collected in laboratory conditions. Experimental results indicate that the classification approach is highly effective for distinguishing between various targets of interest. Most significantly, the proposed classification method is robust to a wide range of observational geometry.
Vimal Thilak, Charles D. Creusere, David G. Voelz
ICIP (4)1
2002 Robust bandlimited watermarking with trellis coded modulation
abstract
Digital watermarking is equivalent to bandlimited, power-limited digital communication. The power limit is due to the requirement of imperceptible watermarks, and has long been recognized. The bandwidth limit is due to the lowpass spectrum of images and possible lowpass attacks (malicious or unintentional). This is related to the concept of channel capacity, and has only recently been addressed in the context of watermarking. To achieve high reliability without loss of watermark data rates, we propose an adaptation of trellis coded modulation (TCM). Our method is applicable to a wide class of watermarking algorithms. The objective is to maintain the data rate while improving reliability of watermark detection, in terms of bit error rates (BER). Alternatively, higher data rates can be achieved while maintaining watermark BER. We conduct experiments for blind as well as. informed detection. Simulation results show significant improvement compared to conventional methods over a wide-range of channel (attack) signal-to-noise ratios.
Aria Nosratinia, Vimal Thilak
ICIP (2)2