Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ning Li 0055

dblp:14/5410-55 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0003-3045-4345ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Language models and text generation · 39% Trustworthy machine learning · 30% Learning theory · 30%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Learning and educational technologies · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › Data-centric AI
data contamination detection
1.012026
Controllable Contamination Detection for Reliable LLM Evaluation with Statistical Guarantees · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation
1.012026
Controllable Contamination Detection for Reliable LLM Evaluation with Statistical Guarantees · ACL (1) 2026
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical guarantees
1.012026
Controllable Contamination Detection for Reliable LLM Evaluation with Statistical Guarantees · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model
0.312026
LongTutor: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Long-term Personalized Tutoring · ACL (1) 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large language model · 2.0statistical testing · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 LongTutor: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Long-term Personalized Tutoring
abstract
Ning Li, Zheng Zhang, Zhenya Huang, Rui Li, Yi Zhan, Yinbo Luo, Qi Liu, Enhong Chen. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026.
Ning Li 0055, Zheng Zhang 0048, Zhenya Huang, Rui Li 0093, Yinbo Luo, Qi Liu 0003, Enhong Chen
ACL (1)1
2026 Controllable Contamination Detection for Reliable LLM Evaluation with Statistical Guarantees
abstract
Zheng Zhang, Qi Liu, Siyuan Liang, Ning Li, Zirui Hu, Weibo Gao, Rui Li, Zhenya Huang, Leszek Rutkowski, Baosheng Yu, Dacheng Tao. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026.
Zheng Zhang 0048, Qi Liu 0003, Siyuan Liang 0004, Ning Li 0055, Zirui Hu, Weibo Gao, Rui Li 0093, Zhenya Huang, Leszek Rutkowski, Baosheng Yu, Dacheng Tao
ACL (1)4
2026 The Other Side of the Coin: Exploring Fairness in Retrieval-Augmented Generation
abstract
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enhances Large Language Models (LLMs) by retrieving relevant document from external knowledge sources. By referencing this external knowledge, RAG effectively reduces the generation of factually incorrect content and addresses hallucination issues within LLMs. Recently, there has been growing attention to improving the performance and efficiency of RAG systems from various perspectives. While these advancements have yielded significant results, the application of RAG in domains with considerable societal implications raises a critical question about fairness: What impact does the introduction of the RAG paradigm have on the fairness of LLMs? To address this question, we conduct extensive experiments by varying the LLMs, retrievers, and retrieval sources. Our experimental analysis reveals that the scale of the LLMs plays a significant role in influencing fairness outcomes within the RAG framework. When the model scale is smaller than 8B, the integration of retrieval mechanisms often exacerbates unfairness in small-scale LLMs (e.g., LLaMA3.2-1B, Mistral-7B, and LLaMA3-8B). To mitigate the fairness issues introduced by RAG for small-scale LLMs, we propose two approaches, FairFT and FairFilter. Specifically, in FairFT, we align the retriever with the LLM in terms of fairness, enabling it to retrieve documents that facilitate fairer model outputs. In FairFilter, we propose a fairness filtering mechanism to filter out biased content after retrieval. Finally, we validate our proposed approaches on real-world datasets, demonstrating their effectiveness in improving fairness while maintaining performance.
Zheng Zhang 0048, Ning Li 0055, Qi Liu 0003, Rui Li 0093, Weibo Gao, Qingyang Mao, Zhenya Huang, Baosheng Yu, Dacheng Tao
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.2