Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jan Erik Solem
dblp:14/5633
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
7as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 6 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 7 · 4 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
3D vision · 96% Representation and self-supervised learning · 4% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
5 papers |
Geometric modeling and processing · 68% Image and video processing · 29% Computational photography and imaging · 3% |
Topics — the 21 heaviest of 24, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › 3D vision
camera calibration |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Minimal Solvers for Relative Pose with a Single Unknown Radial Distortion · CVPR 2014 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
camera pose estimation |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Minimal Solvers for Relative Pose with a Single Unknown Radial Distortion · CVPR 2014 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › multi-view geometry › epipolar geometry estimation
fundamental matrix estimation |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Minimal Solvers for Relative Pose with a Single Unknown Radial Distortion · CVPR 2014 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › camera calibration
radial distortion |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Minimal Solvers for Relative Pose with a Single Unknown Radial Distortion · CVPR 2014 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › camera pose estimation
relative pose estimation |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Minimal Solvers for Relative Pose with a Single Unknown Radial Distortion · CVPR 2014 |
Geometric modeling and processing
surface reconstruction |
0.2 | 3 | 2006 | Reconstructing Open Surfaces from Image Data · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2006 Surface Reconstruction using Learned Shape Models · NIPS 2004 Reconstructing Open Surfaces from Unorganized Data Points · CVPR (2) 2004 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d reconstruction
surface reconstruction |
0.1 | 2 | 2007 | Variational Surface Interpolation from Sparse Point and Normal Data · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2007 Visibility Constrained Surface Evolution · CVPR (2) 2005 |
Geometric modeling and processing › surface reconstruction
open surface reconstruction |
0.1 | 2 | 2006 | Reconstructing Open Surfaces from Image Data · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2006 Reconstructing Open Surfaces from Unorganized Data Points · CVPR (2) 2004 |
Image and video processing › image segmentation
region-based segmentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Fast Variational Segmentation using Partial Extremal Initialization · CVPR (1) 2006 |
Image and video processing › image segmentation
variational segmentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Fast Variational Segmentation using Partial Extremal Initialization · CVPR (1) 2006 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › reconstruction-based representation learning
feature reconstruction |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Visibility Constrained Surface Evolution · CVPR (2) 2005 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › multi-view geometry
visibility constraints |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Visibility Constrained Surface Evolution · CVPR (2) 2005 |
Image and video processing › mathematical imaging › partial differential equations for image processing
level set methods |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Visibility Constrained Surface Evolution · CVPR (2) 2005 |
Geometric modeling and processing › shape deformation
surface evolution |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Visibility Constrained Surface Evolution · CVPR (2) 2005 |
Geometric modeling and processing
point cloud processing |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Reconstructing Open Surfaces from Unorganized Data Points · CVPR (2) 2004 |
Geometric modeling and processing › surface reconstruction › point cloud reconstruction
unorganized point reconstruction |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Reconstructing Open Surfaces from Unorganized Data Points · CVPR (2) 2004 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d shape reconstruction
specular surface reconstruction |
0.0 | 1 | 2007 | Variational Surface Interpolation from Sparse Point and Normal Data · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2007 |
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging
medical image analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2006 | Fast Variational Segmentation using Partial Extremal Initialization · CVPR (1) 2006 |
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging › medical image analysis
MRI segmentation |
0.0 | 1 | 2006 | Fast Variational Segmentation using Partial Extremal Initialization · CVPR (1) 2006 |
Computational photography and imaging › image-based modeling
3d reconstruction from images |
0.0 | 1 | 2006 | Reconstructing Open Surfaces from Image Data · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2006 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d shape reconstruction |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Surface Reconstruction using Learned Shape Models · NIPS 2004 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
polynomial solver · 0.2gröbner basis · 0.2level-set framework · 0.1partial extremal initialization · 0.1level set search · 0.1gradient descent PDE · 0.1variational calculus · 0.1partial differential equations · 0.1level set · 0.1active shape model · 0.1variational constraint · 0.1sparse point constraints · 0.1image data · 0.1level set framework · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | A Minimal Solution to Relative Pose with Unknown Focal Length and Radial Distortion
Fangyuan Jiang, Yubin Kuang, Jan Erik Solem, Kalle Åström |
ACCV (2) | 3 |
| 2014 | Minimal Solvers for Relative Pose with a Single Unknown Radial DistortionabstractIn this paper, we study the problems of estimating relative pose between two cameras in the presence of radial distortion. Specifically, we consider minimal problems where one of the cameras has no or known radial distortion. There are three useful cases for this setup with a single unknown distortion: (i) fundamental matrix estimation where the two cameras are uncalibrated, (ii) essential matrix estimation for a partially calibrated camera pair, (iii) essential matrix estimation for one calibrated camera and one camera with unknown focal length. We study the parameterization of these three problems and derive fast polynomial solvers based on Gröbner basis methods. We demonstrate the numerical stability of the solvers on synthetic data. The minimal solvers have also been applied to real imagery with convincing results. Yubin Kuang, Jan Erik Solem, Fredrik Kahl, Kalle Åström |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2008 | Efficient image inner products applied to active appearance modelsabstractThis paper introduces a clever way of computing inner products between images in order to drastically reduce the computational complexity of fitting appearance models to images. This speedup is possible since computing the hessian matrix for the parameter updates becomes several orders of magnitude faster which in turn has enormous impact on applications. Contrary to previous work within the area, our method has no negative side-effects on accuracy, convergence and robustness of the algorithm to which it is applied. The inner products are computed in a linear space defined by the appearance model which makes the computation time independent of the model image size. Karl Netzell, Jan Erik Solem |
ICPR | 2 |
| 2007 | Variational Surface Interpolation from Sparse Point and Normal DataabstractMany visual cues for surface reconstruction from known views are sparse in nature, e.g., specularities, surface silhouettes, and salient features in an otherwise textureless region. Often, these cues are the only information available to an observer. To allow these constraints to be used either in conjunction with dense constraints such as pixel-wise similarity, or alone, we formulate such constraints in a variational framework. We propose a sparse variational constraint in the level set framework, enforcing a surface to pass through a specific point, and a sparse variational constraint on the surface normal along the observed viewing direction, as is the nature of, e.g., specularities. These constraints are capable of reconstructing surfaces from extremely sparse data. The approach has been applied and validated on the shape from specularities problem. Jan Erik Solem, Henrik Aanæs, Anders Heyden |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 1 |
| 2006 | Fast Variational Segmentation using Partial Extremal InitializationabstractIn this paper we consider region-based variational segmentation of two- and three-dimensional images by the minimization of functionals whose fidelity term is the quotient of two integrals. Users often refrain from quotient functionals, even when they seem to be the most natural choice, probably because the corresponding gradient descent PDEs are nonlocal and hence require the computation of global properties. Here it is shown how this problem may be overcome by employing the structure of the Euler-Lagrange equation of the fidelity term to construct a good initialization for the gradient descent PDE, which will then converge rapidly to the desired (local) minimum. The initializer is found by making a one-dimensional search among the level sets of a function related to the fidelity term, picking the level set which minimizes the segmentation functional. This partial extremal initialization is tested on a medical segmentation problem with velocity- and intensity data from MR images. In this particular application, the partial extremal initialization speeds up the segmentation by two orders of magnitude compared to straight forward gradient descent. Jan Erik Solem, Niels Chr. Overgaard, Markus Persson, Anders Heyden |
CVPR (1) | 1 |
| 2006 | Reconstructing Open Surfaces from Image Data
Jan Erik Solem, Anders Heyden |
Int. J. Comput. Vis. | 1 |
| 2005 | Visibility Constrained Surface EvolutionabstractThe problem of feature-based surface reconstruction is considered in this paper. Our main contribution is the ability to handle visibility constraints, obtained from the projections of points, curves and silhouettes, in the surface fitting process. While traditional methods often ignore such information, we show that visibility constraints not only give better initial surface estimates and faster convergence, but also provide an important cue for determining surface topology. The problem is cast as a variational problem with constraints within the level set framework. It is shown how to evolve the surface without violating the visibility constraints using methods from variational calculus. Applications of the theory are detailed for a number of important cases of geometric primitives: points, curves and visual hulls. Several experiments on real image sequences are given to demonstrate the performance of the approach. Jan Erik Solem, Fredrik Kahl, Anders Heyden |
CVPR (2) | 1 |
| 2004 | Reconstructing Open Surfaces from Unorganized Data Points
Jan Erik Solem, Anders Heyden |
CVPR (2) | 1 |
| 2004 | Velocity Based Segmentation in Phase Contrast MRI Images
Jan Erik Solem, Markus Persson, Anders Heyden |
MICCAI (1) | 1 |
| 2004 | Surface Reconstruction using Learned Shape ModelsabstractWe consider the problem of geometrical surface reconstruction from one or several images using learned shape models. While humans can effort- lessly retrieve 3D shape information, this inverse problem has turned out to be difficult to perform automatically. We introduce a framework based on level set surface reconstruction and shape models for achieving this goal. Through this merging, we obtain an efficient and robust method for reconstructing surfaces of an object category of interest. The shape model includes surface cues such as point, curve and silhou- ette features. Based on ideas from Active Shape Models, we show how both the geometry and the appearance of these features can be modelled consistently in a multi-view context. The complete surface is obtained by evolving a level set driven by a PDE, which tries to fit the surface to the inferred 3D features. In addition, an a priori 3D surface model is used to regularize the solution, in particular, where surface features are sparse. Experiments are demonstrated on a database of real face images. Jan Erik Solem, Fredrik Kahl |
NIPS | 1 |