Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

David Wingate

dblp:14/5737 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
25ranked-venue papers
12as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0003-1850-6926ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 25 · 12 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 3 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
18 papers
Language models and text generation · 35% Reinforcement learning · 19% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 13%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Audio and music processing · 100%

Topics — the 30 heaviest of 48, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › natural language understanding › question answering
multiple-choice question answering
0.712023
Leveraging Large Language Models for Multiple Choice Question Answering · ICLR 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
prompting
0.712023
Leveraging Large Language Models for Multiple Choice Question Answering · ICLR 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › prompting
prompt engineering
0.612022
An Information-theoretic Approach to Prompt Engineering Without Ground Truth Labels · ACL (1) 2022
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › logic-based reasoning
symbolic reasoning
0.512021
Leveraging the Inductive Bias of Large Language Models for Abstract Textual Reasoning · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › representation engineering
activation editing
0.412020
Towards Neural Programming Interfaces · NeurIPS 2020
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
controllable text generation
0.412020
Towards Neural Programming Interfaces · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.412020
Towards Neural Programming Interfaces · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › latent representation learning › state representation learning
predictive state representation
0.342008
Efficiently learning linear-linear exponential family predictive representations of state · ICML 2008
Exponential Family Predictive Representations of State · NIPS 2007
Relational Knowledge with Predictive State Representations · IJCAI 2007
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
action selection
0.312017
What Can You Do with a Rock? Affordance Extraction via Word Embeddings · IJCAI 2017
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
commonsense reasoning
0.312017
What Can You Do with a Rock? Affordance Extraction via Word Embeddings · IJCAI 2017
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning
0.322014
A Physics-Based Model Prior for Object-Oriented MDPs · ICML 2014
Exponential Family Predictive Representations of State · NIPS 2007
Audio and music processing
microphone array processing
0.212016
Robust Source Localization and Enhancement With a Probabilistic Steered Response Power Model · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2016
Audio and music processing
sound source localization
0.212016
Robust Source Localization and Enhancement With a Probabilistic Steered Response Power Model · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2016
Audio and music processing
source separation
0.212016
Robust Source Localization and Enhancement With a Probabilistic Steered Response Power Model · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2016
Audio and music processing › sound source localization › direction-of-arrival estimation
steered response power
0.212016
Robust Source Localization and Enhancement With a Probabilistic Steered Response Power Model · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2016
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
bayesian nonparametric model
0.222011
Infinite Dynamic Bayesian Networks · ICML 2011
Nonparametric Bayesian Policy Priors for Reinforcement Learning · NIPS 2010
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › markov decision process › structured markov decision process
object-oriented MDPs
0.212014
A Physics-Based Model Prior for Object-Oriented MDPs · ICML 2014
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot learning
0.212014
A Physics-Based Model Prior for Object-Oriented MDPs · ICML 2014
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
exponential family
0.222008
Efficiently learning linear-linear exponential family predictive representations of state · ICML 2008
Exponential Family Predictive Representations of State · NIPS 2007
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
compositional learning
0.112021
Leveraging the Inductive Bias of Large Language Models for Abstract Textual Reasoning · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model
0.122008
Efficiently learning linear-linear exponential family predictive representations of state · ICML 2008
Kernel Predictive Linear Gaussian models for nonlinear stochastic dynamical systems · ICML 2006
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative adversarial network
0.112020
Towards Neural Programming Interfaces · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
bayesian network
0.112011
Infinite Dynamic Bayesian Networks · ICML 2011
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy search
bayesian policy search
0.112011
Bayesian Policy Search with Policy Priors · IJCAI 2011
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › bayesian network
dynamic bayesian network
0.112011
Infinite Dynamic Bayesian Networks · ICML 2011
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy search
0.112011
Bayesian Policy Search with Policy Priors · IJCAI 2011
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
statistical inference
0.112011
Nonstandard Interpretations of Probabilistic Programs for Efficient Inference · NIPS 2011
Programming languages and type systems
probabilistic programming
0.112011
Nonstandard Interpretations of Probabilistic Programs for Efficient Inference · NIPS 2011
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
partially observable reinforcement learning
0.112010
Nonparametric Bayesian Policy Priors for Reinforcement Learning · NIPS 2010
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy learning
0.112010
Nonparametric Bayesian Policy Priors for Reinforcement Learning · NIPS 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

prompt engineering · 0.7information theory · 0.6symbolic reasoning engine · 0.5large language model · 0.5hidden activation manipulation · 0.4dataset construction · 0.4GAN-inspired loss · 0.4word embeddings · 0.3wiener post-filtering · 0.2probabilistic modeling · 0.2beamforming · 0.2relational representation · 0.2physics-based model priors · 0.2provenance tracking · 0.1monads · 0.1automatic differentiation · 0.1state partitioning · 0.0prioritization · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Leveraging Large Language Models for Multiple Choice Question Answering
David Wingate
ICLR2
2022 An Information-theoretic Approach to Prompt Engineering Without Ground Truth Labels
abstract
Taylor Sorensen, Joshua Robinson, Christopher Rytting, Alexander Shaw, Kyle Rogers, Alexia Delorey, Mahmoud Khalil, Nancy Fulda, David Wingate. Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2022.
Taylor Sorensen, Christopher Michael Rytting, Alexander Glenn Shaw, Kyle Jeffrey Rogers, Alexia Pauline Delorey, Mahmoud Khalil, Nancy Fulda, David Wingate
ACL (1)9
2021 Leveraging the Inductive Bias of Large Language Models for Abstract Textual Reasoning
abstract
Large natural language models (LMs) (such as GPT-3 or T5) demonstrate impressive abilities across a range of general NLP tasks. Here, we show that the knowledge embedded in such models provides a useful inductive bias, not just on traditional NLP tasks, but also in the nontraditional task of training a symbolic reasoning engine. We observe that these engines learn quickly and generalize in a natural way that reflects human intuition. For example, training such a system to model block-stacking might naturally generalize to stacking other types of objects because of structure in the real world that has been partially captured by the language describing it. We study several abstract textual reasoning tasks, such as object manipulation and navigation, and demonstrate multiple types of generalization to novel scenarios and the symbols that comprise them. We also demonstrate the surprising utility of $\textit{compositional learning}$, where a learner dedicated to mastering a complicated task gains an advantage by training on relevant simpler tasks instead of jumping straight to the complicated task.
Christopher Michael Rytting, David Wingate
NeurIPS2
2020 Towards Neural Programming Interfaces
abstract
It is notoriously difficult to control the behavior of artificial neural networks such as generative neural language models. We recast the problem of controlling natural language generation as that of learning to interface with a pretrained language model, just as Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) control the behavior of programs by altering hyperparameters. In this new paradigm, a specialized neural network (called a Neural Programming Interface or NPI) learns to interface with a pretrained language model by manipulating the hidden activations of the pretrained model to produce desired outputs. Importantly, no permanent changes are made to the weights of the original model, allowing us to re-purpose pretrained models for new tasks without overwriting any aspect of the language model. We also contribute a new data set construction algorithm and GAN-inspired loss function that allows us to train NPI models to control outputs of autoregressive transformers. In experiments against other state-of-the-art approaches, we demonstrate the efficacy of our methods using OpenAI’s GPT-2 model, successfully controlling noun selection, topic aversion, offensive speech filtering, and other aspects of language while largely maintaining the controlled model's fluency under deterministic settings.
Zachary Brown 0001, Nathaniel R. Robinson, David Wingate, Nancy Fulda
NeurIPS3
2017 What Can You Do with a Rock? Affordance Extraction via Word Embeddings
abstract
Autonomous agents must often detect affordances: the set of behaviors enabled by a situation. Affordance extraction is particularly helpful in domains with large action spaces, allowing the agent to prune its search space by avoiding futile behaviors. This paper presents a method for affordance extraction via word embeddings trained on a tagged Wikipedia corpus. The resulting word vectors are treated as a common knowledge database which can be queried using linear algebra. We apply this method to a reinforcement learning agent in a text-only environment and show that affordance-based action selection improves performance in most cases. Our method increases the computational complexity of each learning step but significantly reduces the total number of steps needed. In addition, the agent's action selections begin to resemble those a human would choose.
Nancy Fulda, Daniel Ricks, Ben Murdoch, David Wingate
IJCAI4
2017 Deep visual gravity vector detection for unmanned aircraft attitude estimation
abstract
This paper demonstrates a feasible method for using a deep neural network as a sensor to estimate the attitude of a flying vehicle using only flight video. A dataset of still images and associated gravity vectors was collected and used to perform supervised learning. The network builds on a previously trained network and was trained to be able to approximate the attitude of the camera with an average error of about 8 degrees. Flight test video was recorded and processed with a relatively simple visual odometry method. The aircraft attitude is then estimated with the visual odometry as the state propagation and network providing the attitude measurement in an extended Kalman filter. Results show that the proposed method of having the neural network provide a gravity vector attitude measurement from the flight imagery reduces the standard deviation of the attitude error by approximately 12 times compared to a baseline approach.
Gary J. Ellingson, David Wingate, Timothy W. McLain
IROS2
2016 Robust Source Localization and Enhancement With a Probabilistic Steered Response Power Model
abstract
Source localization and enhancement are often treated separately in the array processing literature. One can apply steered response power (SRP) localization to determine the sources' Directions-Of-Arrival (DOA) followed by beamforming and Wiener post-filtering to isolate the sources from each other and ambient interference. We show that when there is significant overlap between directional sources of interest in the time-frequency (TF) plane, traditional SRP localization breaks down. This may occur, for example, when the array is located near a reflector, significant early reflections are present, or the sources are harmonized. We propose a joint solution to the localization and enhancement problems via a probabilistic interpretation of the SRP function. We formulate optimization procedures for (1) a mixture of single-source SRP distributions (MoSRP) and (2) a multi-source SRP distribution (MultSRP). Unlike in traditional localization, the latter approach explicitly models source overlap in the TF plane. Results shows that the MultSRP model is capable of localizing sources with significant overlap in the TF domain and that either of the proposed methods out-performs standard SRP localization for multiple speakers.
Johannes Traa, David Wingate, Noah D. Stein, Paris Smaragdis
IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process.2
2014 A Physics-Based Model Prior for Object-Oriented MDPs
abstract
One of the key challenges in using reinforcement learning in robotics is the need for models that capture natural world structure. There are, methods that formalize multi-object dynamics using relational representations, but these methods are not sufficiently compact for real-world robotics. We present a physics-based approach that exploits modern simulation tools to efficiently parameterize physical dynamics. Our results show that this representation can result in much faster learning, by virtue of its strong but appropriate inductive bias in physical environments.
Jonathan Scholz, Martin Levihn, Charles L. Isbell Jr., David Wingate
ICML4
2011 Infinite Dynamic Bayesian Networks
Finale Doshi-Velez, David Wingate, Josh Tenenbaum, Nicholas Roy
ICML2
2011 Bayesian Policy Search with Policy Priors
David Wingate, Noah D. Goodman, Daniel M. Roy 0001, Leslie Pack Kaelbling, Josh Tenenbaum
IJCAI1
2011 Nonstandard Interpretations of Probabilistic Programs for Efficient Inference
abstract
Probabilistic programming languages allow modelers to specify a stochastic process using syntax that resembles modern programming languages. Because the program is in machine-readable format, a variety of techniques from compiler design and program analysis can be used to examine the structure of the distribution represented by the probabilistic program. We show how nonstandard interpretations of probabilistic programs can be used to craft efficient inference algorithms: information about the structure of a distribution (such as gradients or dependencies) is generated as a monad-like side computation while executing the program. These interpretations can be easily coded using special-purpose objects and operator overloading. We implement two examples of nonstandard interpretations in two different languages, and use them as building blocks to construct inference algorithms: automatic differentiation, which enables gradient based methods, and provenance tracking, which enables efficient construction of global proposals.
David Wingate, Noah D. Goodman, Andreas Stuhlmüller, Jeffrey Mark Siskind
NIPS1
2010 Nonparametric Bayesian Policy Priors for Reinforcement Learning
abstract
We consider reinforcement learning in partially observable domains where the agent can query an expert for demonstrations. Our nonparametric Bayesian approach combines model knowledge, inferred from expert information and independent exploration, with policy knowledge inferred from expert trajectories. We introduce priors that bias the agent towards models with both simple representations and simple policies, resulting in improved policy and model learning.
Finale Doshi-Velez, David Wingate, Nicholas Roy, Josh Tenenbaum
NIPS2
2009 Workshop summary: Results of the 2009 reinforcement learning competition
abstract
No abstract available.
David Wingate, Carlos Diuk, Lihong Li 0001, Jordan Frank
ICML1
2009 A Bayesian Sampling Approach to Exploration in Reinforcement Learning
John Asmuth, Lihong Li 0001, Michael L. Littman, Ali Nouri, David Wingate
UAI5
2009 The Infinite Latent Events Model
David Wingate, Noah D. Goodman, Daniel M. Roy 0001, Josh Tenenbaum
UAI1
2008 Efficiently learning linear-linear exponential family predictive representations of state
abstract
Exponential Family PSR (EFPSR) models capture stochastic dynamical systems by representing state as the parameters of an exponential family distribution over a shortterm window of future observations. They are appealing from a learning perspective because they are fully observed (meaning expressions for maximum likelihood do not involve hidden quantities), but are still expressive enough to both capture existing models and predict new models. While maximumlikelihood learning algorithms for EFPSRs exist, they are not computationally feasible. We present a new, computationally efficient, learning algorithm based on an approximate likelihood function. The algorithm can be interpreted as attempting to induce stationary distributions of observations, features and states which match their empirically observed counterparts. The approximate likelihood, and the idea of matching stationary distributions, may apply to other models. 1.
David Wingate, Satinder Singh 0001
ICML1
2007 Relational Knowledge with Predictive State Representations
David Wingate, Vishal Soni, Britton Wolfe, Satinder Singh 0001
IJCAI1
2007 Exponential Family Predictive Representations of State
abstract
In order to represent state in controlled, partially observable, stochastic dynamical systems, some sort of sufficient statistic for history is necessary. Predictive repre- sentations of state (PSRs) capture state as statistics of the future. We introduce a new model of such systems called the “Exponential family PSR,” which defines as state the time-varying parameters of an exponential family distribution which models n sequential observations in the future. This choice of state representation explicitly connects PSRs to state-of-the-art probabilistic modeling, which allows us to take advantage of current efforts in high-dimensional density estimation, and in particular, graphical models and maximum entropy models. We present a pa- rameter learning algorithm based on maximum likelihood, and we show how a variety of current approximate inference methods apply. We evaluate the qual- ity of our model with reinforcement learning by directly evaluating the control performance of the model.
David Wingate, Satinder Singh 0001
NIPS1
2006 Mixtures of Predictive Linear Gaussian Models for Nonlinear, Stochastic Dynamical Systems
David Wingate, Satinder Singh 0001
AAAI1
2006 Kernel Predictive Linear Gaussian models for nonlinear stochastic dynamical systems
abstract
The recent Predictive Linear Gaussian model (or PLG) improves upon traditional linear dynamical system models by using a predictive representation of state, which makes consistent parameter estimation possible without any loss of modeling power and while using fewer parameters. In this paper we extend the PLG to model stochastic, nonlinear dynamical systems by using kernel methods. With a Gaussian kernel, the model admits closed form solutions to the state update equations due to conjugacy between the dynamics and the state representation. We also explore an efficient sigma-point approximation to the state updates, and show how all of the model parameters can be learned directly from data (and can be learned on-line with the Kernel Recursive Least-Squares algorithm). We empirically compare the model and its approximation to the original PLG and discuss their relative advantages.
David Wingate, Satinder Singh 0001
ICML1
2005 Predictive Linear-Gaussian Models of Stochastic Dynamical Systems
Matthew R. Rudary, Satinder Singh 0001, David Wingate
UAI3
2005 Prioritization Methods for Accelerating MDP Solvers
abstract
The performance of value and policy iteration can be dramatically improved by eliminating redundant or useless backups, and by backing up states in the right order. We study several methods designed to accelerate these iterative solvers, including prioritization, partitioning, and variable reordering. We generate a family of algorithms by combining several of the methods discussed, and present extensive empirical evidence demonstrating that performance can improve by several orders of magnitude for many problems, while preserving accuracy and convergence guarantees.
David Wingate, Kevin D. Seppi
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1
2004 P3VI: a partitioned, prioritized, parallel value iterator
abstract
We present an examination of the state-of-the-art for using value iteration to solve large-scale discrete Markov Decision Processes. We introduce an architecture which combines three independent performance enhancements (the intelligent prioritization of computation, state partitioning, and massively parallel processing) into a single algorithm. We show that each idea improves performance in a different way, meaning that algorithm designers do not have to trade one improvement for another. We give special attention to parallelization issues, discussing how to efficiently partition states, distribute partitions to processors, minimize message passing and ensure high scalability. We present experimental results which demonstrate that this approach solves large problems in reasonable time.
David Wingate, Kevin D. Seppi
ICML1
2004 Variable resolution discretization in the joint space
abstract
We present JoSTLe, an algorithm that performs value iteration on control problems with continuous actions, allowing this useful reinforcement learning technique to be applied to problems where a priori action discretization is inadequate. The algorithm is an extension of a variable resolution technique that works for problems with continuous states and discrete actions [6]. Results are given that indicate that JoSTLe is a promising step toward reinforcement learning in a fully continuous domain.
Christopher K. Monson, David Wingate, Kevin D. Seppi, Todd Peterson 0001
ICMLA2
2003 Efficient Value Iteration Using Partitioned Models
David Wingate, Kevin D. Seppi
ICMLA1