Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Grégory Théoduloz

dblp:14/6763 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 4Theory of computation · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
3 papers
Program analysis · 67% Program verification · 33%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Program verification › abstraction-based verification
predicate abstraction
0.112008
Program Analysis with Dynamic Precision Adjustment · ASE 2008
Program analysis › static analysis › pointer analysis
shape analysis
0.112006
Lazy Shape Analysis · CAV 2006
Program analysis › static analysis
abstract interpretation
0.012007
Configurable Software Verification: Concretizing the Convergence of Model Checking and Program Analysis · CAV 2007
Automated reasoning and model checking
model checking
0.012007
Configurable Software Verification: Concretizing the Convergence of Model Checking and Program Analysis · CAV 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

predicate abstraction · 0.1dynamic precision adjustment · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 Shape Refinement through Explicit Heap Analysis
Dirk Beyer 0001, Thomas A. Henzinger, Grégory Théoduloz, Damien Zufferey
FASE3
2008 Program Analysis with Dynamic Precision Adjustment
abstract
We present and evaluate a framework and tool for combining multiple program analyses which allows the dynamic (on-line) adjustment of the precision of each analysis depending on the accumulated results. For example, the explicit tracking of the values of a variable may be switched off in favor of a predicate abstraction when and where the number of different variable values that have been encountered has exceeded a specified threshold. The method is evaluated on verifying the SSH client/server software and shows significant gains compared with predicate abstraction-based model checking.
Dirk Beyer 0001, Thomas A. Henzinger, Grégory Théoduloz
ASE3
2007 Configurable Software Verification: Concretizing the Convergence of Model Checking and Program Analysis
Dirk Beyer 0001, Thomas A. Henzinger, Grégory Théoduloz
CAV3
2006 Lazy Shape Analysis
Dirk Beyer 0001, Thomas A. Henzinger, Grégory Théoduloz
CAV3