Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kengo Kato
dblp:14/8507
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
0as first author
5since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 33% Learning theory · 33% Reinforcement learning · 17% | |
| Theoretical computer science
4 papers |
Information theory · 51% Mathematical optimization · 44% Approximation and online algorithms · 5% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 50% Systems and software security · 50% |
Topics — the 17 heaviest of 19, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › regularization for reinforcement learning
entropy regularization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Entropic Gromov-Wasserstein Distances: Stability and Algorithms · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › optimal transport
gromov-wasserstein distance |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Entropic Gromov-Wasserstein Distances: Stability and Algorithms · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
optimal transport |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Entropic Gromov-Wasserstein Distances: Stability and Algorithms · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Information theory › information measures › divergence measures
divergence estimation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Limit Distribution Theory for f-Divergences · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2024 |
Information theory › information measures › divergence measures
f-divergence |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Limit Distribution Theory for f-Divergences · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical estimation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Statistical, Robustness, and Computational Guarantees for Sliced Wasserstein Distances · NeurIPS 2022 |
Mathematical optimization
optimal transport |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Statistical, Robustness, and Computational Guarantees for Sliced Wasserstein Distances · NeurIPS 2022 |
Mathematical optimization › optimal transport › wasserstein distance
sliced wasserstein distance |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Statistical, Robustness, and Computational Guarantees for Sliced Wasserstein Distances · NeurIPS 2022 |
Information theory › information measures › divergence measures
statistical distance |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Smooth p-Wasserstein Distance: Structure, Empirical Approximation, and Statistical Applications · ICML 2021 |
Mathematical optimization › optimal transport
wasserstein distance |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Smooth p-Wasserstein Distance: Structure, Empirical Approximation, and Statistical Applications · ICML 2021 |
Systems and software security
auditing |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Limit Distribution Theory for f-Divergences · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2024 |
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Limit Distribution Theory for f-Divergences · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2024 |
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation algorithms |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Entropic Gromov-Wasserstein Distances: Stability and Algorithms · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › optimal transport › entropic optimal transport
sinkhorn algorithm |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Entropic Gromov-Wasserstein Distances: Stability and Algorithms · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
robust estimation |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Statistical, Robustness, and Computational Guarantees for Sliced Wasserstein Distances · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Statistical, Robustness, and Computational Guarantees for Sliced Wasserstein Distances · NeurIPS 2022 |
Information theory › hypothesis testing
two-sample testing |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Smooth p-Wasserstein Distance: Structure, Empirical Approximation, and Statistical Applications · ICML 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
gaussian smoothing · 2.5sinkhorn fixed point iterations · 1.5hadamard directional differentiability · 1.5functional delta method · 1.5subgradient optimization · 1.1monte carlo estimation · 1.1minimax risk analysis · 1.1sobolev distance · 1.0maximum mean discrepancy · 1.0accelerated gradient methods · 0.8accelerated gradient method · 0.8smooth 1-wasserstein distance · 0.4minimum distance estimation · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Entropic Gromov-Wasserstein Distances: Stability and AlgorithmsabstractThe Gromov-Wasserstein (GW) distance quantifies discrepancy between metric measure spaces and provides a natural framework for aligning heterogeneous datasets. Alas, as exact computation of GW alignment is NP-complete, entropic regularization provides an avenue towards a computationally tractable proxy. Leveraging a recently derived variational representation for the quadratic entropic GW (EGW) distance, this work derives the first efficient algorithms for solving the EGW problem subject to formal, non-asymptotic convergence guarantees. To that end, we derive smoothness and convexity properties of the objective in this variational problem, which enables its resolution by the accelerated gradient method. Our algorithms employ Sinkhorn's fixed point iterations to compute an approximate gradient, which we model as an inexact oracle. We furnish convergence rates towards local and even global solutions (the latter holds under a precise quantitative condition on the regularization parameter), characterize the effects of gradient inexactness, and prove that stationary points of the EGW problem converge towards a stationary point of the unregularized GW problem, in the limit of vanishing regularization. We provide numerical experiments that validate our theory and empirically demonstrate the state-of-the-art empirical performance of our algorithm. Gabriel Rioux, Ziv Goldfeld, Kengo Kato |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 3 |
| 2024 | Limit Distribution Theory for f-Divergencesabstract$f$-divergences, which quantify discrepancy between probability distributions, are ubiquitous in information theory, machine learning, and statistics. While there are numerous methods for estimating$f$-divergences from data, a limit distribution theory, which quantifies fluctuations of the estimation error, is largely obscure. As limit theorems are pivotal for valid statistical inference, to close this gap, we develop a general methodology for deriving distributional limits for$f$-divergences based on the functional delta method and Hadamard directional differentiability. Focusing on four prominent$f$-divergences—Kullback-Leibler divergence,$\chi ^{2}$divergence, squared Hellinger distance, and total variation distance—we identify sufficient conditions on the population distributions for the existence of distributional limits and characterize the limiting variables. These results are used to derive one- and two-sample limit theorems for Gaussian-smoothed$f$-divergences, both under the null and the alternative. Finally, an application of the limit distribution theory to auditing differential privacy is proposed and analyzed for significance level and power against local alternatives. Sreejith Sreekumar, Ziv Goldfeld, Kengo Kato |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 3 |
| 2023 | Limit Distribution Theory for KL divergence and Applications to Auditing Differential PrivacyabstractThe Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence is a discrepancy measure between probability distribution that plays a central role in information theory, statistics and machine learning. While there are numerous methods for estimating this quantity from data, a limit distribution theory which quantifies fluctuations of the estimation error is largely obscure. In this paper, we close this gap by identifying sufficient conditions on the population distributions for the existence of distributional limits and characterizing the limiting variables. These results are used to derive one- and two-sample limit theorems for Gaussian-smoothed KL divergence, both under the null and the alternative. Finally, an application of the limit distribution result to auditing differential privacy is proposed and analyzed for significance level and power against local alternatives. Sreejith Sreekumar, Ziv Goldfeld, Kengo Kato |
ISIT | 3 |
| 2022 | Statistical, Robustness, and Computational Guarantees for Sliced Wasserstein DistancesabstractSliced Wasserstein distances preserve properties of classic Wasserstein distances while being more scalable for computation and estimation in high dimensions. The goal of this work is to quantify this scalability from three key aspects: (i) empirical convergence rates; (ii) robustness to data contamination; and (iii) efficient computational methods. For empirical convergence, we derive fast rates with explicit dependence of constants on dimension, subject to log-concavity of the population distributions. For robustness, we characterize minimax optimal, dimension-free robust estimation risks, and show an equivalence between robust sliced 1-Wasserstein estimation and robust mean estimation. This enables lifting statistical and algorithmic guarantees available for the latter to the sliced 1-Wasserstein setting. Moving on to computational aspects, we analyze the Monte Carlo estimator for the average-sliced distance, demonstrating that larger dimension can result in faster convergence of the numerical integration error. For the max-sliced distance, we focus on a subgradient-based local optimization algorithm that is frequently used in practice, albeit without formal guarantees, and establish an $O(\epsilon^{-4})$ computational complexity bound for it. Our theory is validated by numerical experiments, which altogether provide a comprehensive quantitative account of the scalability question. Sloan Nietert, Ziv Goldfeld, Ritwik Sadhu, Kengo Kato |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2021 | Smooth p-Wasserstein Distance: Structure, Empirical Approximation, and Statistical ApplicationsabstractDiscrepancy measures between probability distributions, often termed statistical distances, are ubiquitous in probability theory, statistics and machine learning. To combat the curse of dimensionality when estimating these distances from data, recent work has proposed smoothing out local irregularities in the measured distributions via convolution with a Gaussian kernel. Motivated by the scalability of this framework to high dimensions, we investigate the structural and statistical behavior of the Gaussian-smoothed $p$-Wasserstein distance $\mathsf{W}_p^{(\sigma)}$, for arbitrary $p\geq 1$. After establishing basic metric and topological properties of $\mathsf{W}_p^{(\sigma)}$, we explore the asymptotic statistical properties of $\mathsf{W}_p^{(\sigma)}(\hat{\mu}_n,\mu)$, where $\hat{\mu}_n$ is the empirical distribution of $n$ independent observations from $\mu$. We prove that $\mathsf{W}_p^{(\sigma)}$ enjoys a parametric empirical convergence rate of $n^{-1/2}$, which contrasts the $n^{-1/d}$ rate for unsmoothed $\Wp$ when $d \geq 3$. Our proof relies on controlling $\mathsf{W}_p^{(\sigma)}$ by a $p$th-order smooth Sobolev distance $\mathsf{d}_p^{(\sigma)}$ and deriving the limit distribution of $\sqrt{n}\,\mathsf{d}_p^{(\sigma)}(\hat{\mu}_n,\mu)$ for all dimensions $d$. As applications, we provide asymptotic guarantees for two-sample testing and minimum distance estimation using $\mathsf{W}_p^{(\sigma)}$, with experiments for $p=2$ using a maximum mean discrepancy formulation of $\mathsf{d}_2^{(\sigma)}$. Sloan Nietert, Ziv Goldfeld, Kengo Kato |
ICML | 3 |
| 2020 | Limit Distributions for Smooth Total Variation and χ2-Divergence in High DimensionsabstractStatistical divergences are ubiquitous in machine learning as tools for measuring discrepancy between probability distributions. As these applications inherently rely on approximating distributions from samples, we consider empirical approximation under two popular f-divergences: the total variation (TV) distance and the χ2-divergence. To circumvent the sensitivity of these divergences to support mismatch, the framework of Gaussian smoothing is adopted. We study the limit distributions of √nδTV(Pn*Nσ, P*Nσ) and nχ2(Pn*NσIIP*Nσ), where P is the empirical measure based on n independently and identically distributed (i.i.d.) observations from P, Nσ:= N(0, σ2Id), and*stands for convolution. In arbitrary dimension, the limit distributions are characterized in terms of Gaussian process on Ind with covariance operator that depends on P and the isotropic Gaussian density of parameter σ. This, in turn, implies optimality of the n-1/2 expected value convergence rates recently derived for δTV(Pn*Nσ, P*Nσ) and χ2(Pn*Nσk∥*Nσ). These strong statistical guarantees promote empirical approximation under Gaussian smoothing as a potent framework for learning and inference based on high-dimensional data. Ziv Goldfeld, Kengo Kato |
ISIT | 2 |
| 2020 | Asymptotic Guarantees for Generative Modeling Based on the Smooth Wasserstein DistanceabstractMinimum distance estimation (MDE) gained recent attention as a formulation of (implicit) generative modeling. It considers minimizing, over model parameters, a statistical distance between the empirical data distribution and the model. This formulation lends itself well to theoretical analysis, but typical results are hindered by the curse of dimensionality. To overcome this and devise a scalable finite-sample statistical MDE theory, we adopt the framework of smooth 1-Wasserstein distance (SWD) $\mathsf{W}_1^{(\sigma)}$. The SWD was recently shown to preserve the metric and topological structure of classic Wasserstein distances, while enjoying dimension-free empirical convergence rates. In this work, we conduct a thorough statistical study of the minimum smooth Wasserstein estimators (MSWEs), first proving the estimator's measurability and asymptotic consistency. We then characterize the limit distribution of the optimal model parameters and their associated minimal SWD. These results imply an $O(n^{-1/2})$ generalization bound for generative modeling based on MSWE, which holds in arbitrary dimension. Our main technical tool is a novel high-dimensional limit distribution result for empirical $\mathsf{W}_1^{(\sigma)}$. The characterization of a nondegenerate limit stands in sharp contrast with the classic empirical 1-Wasserstein distance, for which a similar result is known only in the one-dimensional case. The validity of our theory is supported by empirical results, posing the SWD as a potent tool for learning and inference in high dimensions. Ziv Goldfeld, Kristjan Greenewald, Kengo Kato |
NeurIPS | 3 |