Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Leila Naslavsky

dblp:14/9 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 4 · 4 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Software testing · 88% Software maintenance and evolution · 12%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software testing › model-based testing
model-based regression testing
0.122007
Towards leveraging model transformation to support model-based testing · ASE 2007
Using traceability to support model-based regression testing · ASE 2007
Software testing
model-based testing
0.122007
Towards leveraging model transformation to support model-based testing · ASE 2007
Using traceability to support model-based regression testing · ASE 2007
Software testing
regression testing
0.122007
Towards leveraging model transformation to support model-based testing · ASE 2007
Using traceability to support model-based regression testing · ASE 2007
Software testing
test generation
0.112007
Towards leveraging model transformation to support model-based testing · ASE 2007
Software maintenance and evolution
traceability
0.112007
Using traceability to support model-based regression testing · ASE 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

traceability analysis · 0.1model transformation · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 MbSRT2: Model-Based Selective Regression Testing with Traceability
abstract
Widespread adoption of model-centric development has created opportunities for software testing, with Model-Based Testing (MBT). MBT supports the generation of test cases from models and the demonstration of model and source-code compliance. Models evolve, much like source code. Thus, an important activity of MBT is selective regression testing, which selects test cases for retest based on model modifications, rather than source-code modifications. This activity explores relationships between model elements and test cases that traverse those elements to locate retest able test cases. We contribute an approach and prototype to model-based selective regression testing, whereby fine-grain traceability relationships among entities in models and test cases are persisted into a traceability infrastructure throughout the test generation process: the relationships represent reasons for test case creation and are used to select test cases for re-run. The approach builds upon existing regression test selection techniques and adopts scenarios as behavioral modeling perspective. We analyze precision, efficiency and safety of the approach through case studies and through theoretical and intuitive reasoning.
Leila Naslavsky, Hadar Ziv, Debra J. Richardson
ICST1
2009 A model-based regression test selection technique
abstract
Throughout their life cycle, software artifacts are modified, and selective regression testing is used to identify the negative impact of modifications. Code-based regression test selection retests test cases sub-set that traverse code modifications. It uses recovered relationships between code parts and test cases that traverse them to locate test cases for retest when code is modified. Broad adoption of model-centric development has created opportunities for software testing. It enabled driving testing processes at higher abstraction levels and demonstrating code to model compliance by means of Model-Based Testing (MBT). Models also evolve, so an important activity of MBT is selective regression testing. It selects test cases for retest based on model modification, so it relies on relationships between model elements and test cases that traverse those elements to locate test cases for retest. We contribute an approach and prototype that during test case generation creates fine-grained traceability relationships between model elements and test cases, which are used to support model-based regression test selection.
Leila Naslavsky, Hadar Ziv, Debra J. Richardson
ICSM1
2007 Using traceability to support model-based regression testing
abstract
Model-driven development is leading to increased use of models in conjunction with source code in software testing. Model-based testing, however, introduces new challenges for testing activities, which include creation and maintenance of traceability information among test-related artifacts. Traceability is required to support activities such as selective regression testing. In fact, most model-based testing automated approaches often concentrate on the test generation and execution activities, while support to other activities is limited (e.g. model-based selective regression testing, coverage analysis and behavioral result evaluation)
Leila Naslavsky, Debra J. Richardson
ASE1
2007 Towards leveraging model transformation to support model-based testing
abstract
The adoption of model-driven development is leading to increased use of models in conjunction with source code in software testing. Model-based testing, however, introduces new challenges for testing activities, which include creation and maintenance of traceability information among test-related artifacts. Traceability is required to support activities such as model-based result evaluation, regression testing and coverage analysis. In this paper, we present an automated approach that leverages model transformation techniques to support test generation. The test generation process includes creation of test-related models and fine-grained relationships among these models. We also motivate our approach with a simple example demonstrating support for model-based regression testing
Leila Naslavsky, Hadar Ziv, Debra J. Richardson
ASE1