Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Emilia Pagano

dblp:14/980 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1996
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Optical networks · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Optical networks
optical transmission
0.011996
Optical Transport Networks Employing All-Optical Wavelength Conversion: Limits and Features · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1996
Optical networks
transmission performance
0.011996
Optical Transport Networks Employing All-Optical Wavelength Conversion: Limits and Features · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1996
Optical networks
wavelength conversion
0.011996
Optical Transport Networks Employing All-Optical Wavelength Conversion: Limits and Features · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1996
Optical networks › optical transmission impairment › fiber nonlinearity
four-wave mixing
0.011996
Optical Transport Networks Employing All-Optical Wavelength Conversion: Limits and Features · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1996

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

system modeling · 0.0simulation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1996 Optical Transport Networks Employing All-Optical Wavelength Conversion: Limits and Features
abstract
An analysis of transmission performance of optical transport networks employing two different types of wavelength conversion (based on four wave mixing and cross phase modulation) and adopting two different node architectures is reported. The performance is evaluated by means of a system modeling which allows one to consider physical phenomena occurring during transmission and all the important impairments that introduce system penalties. The limits of these kinds of network are investigated and the main features are reported. The analysis reveals that both the types of converters can be employed with different features and limitations, according to the considered architecture. An example of geographical network is discussed and its simulated transmission performance is reported.
Roberto Sabella, Eugenio Iannone, Emilia Pagano
IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun.3