Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Urmila Mahadev

dblp:140/7339 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 5 · 4 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
6 papers
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 73% Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 27%
Theoretical computer science
6 papers
Quantum computing and quantum information · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
homomorphic encryption
1.022023
Classical Homomorphic Encryption for Quantum Circuits · SIAM J. Comput. 2023
Classical Homomorphic Encryption for Quantum Circuits · FOCS 2018
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum computing
0.822023
Classical Homomorphic Encryption for Quantum Circuits · SIAM J. Comput. 2023
Classical Verification of Quantum Computations · SIAM J. Comput. 2022
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › one-way functions › trapdoor functions
trapdoor claw-free functions
0.822021
A Cryptographic Test of Quantumness and Certifiable Randomness from a Single Quantum Device · J. ACM 2021
A Cryptographic Test of Quantumness and Certifiable Randomness from a Single Quantum Device · FOCS 2018
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › post-quantum cryptography › lattice-based cryptography
learning with errors
0.832022
Classical Verification of Quantum Computations · SIAM J. Comput. 2022
Classical Homomorphic Encryption for Quantum Circuits · FOCS 2018
Classical Verification of Quantum Computations · FOCS 2018
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
interactive proofs
0.312018
Classical Verification of Quantum Computations · FOCS 2018
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum cryptography
blind quantum computation
0.312018
Classical Homomorphic Encryption for Quantum Circuits · FOCS 2018
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum cryptography
0.312018
A Cryptographic Test of Quantumness and Certifiable Randomness from a Single Quantum Device · FOCS 2018
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum complexity theory
quantum verification
0.312018
Classical Verification of Quantum Computations · FOCS 2018
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
post-quantum cryptography
0.222018
Classical Homomorphic Encryption for Quantum Circuits · FOCS 2018
Classical Verification of Quantum Computations · FOCS 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

learning with errors · 3.5homomorphic encryption · 2.0measurement protocol · 1.8post-quantum security · 0.7learning with errors assumption · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Classical Homomorphic Encryption for Quantum Circuits
Urmila Mahadev
SIAM J. Comput.1
2022 Classical Verification of Quantum Computations
abstract
We present the first protocol allowing a classical computer to interactively verify the result of an efficient quantum computation. We achieve this by constructing a measurement protocol, which enables a classical verifier to use a quantum prover as a trusted measurement device. The protocol forces the prover to behave as follows: the prover must construct an $n$ qubit state of his choice, measure each qubit in the Hadamard or standard basis as directed by the verifier, and report the measurement results to the verifier. The soundness of this protocol is enforced based on the assumption that the learning with errors problem is computationally intractable for efficient quantum machines.
Urmila Mahadev
SIAM J. Comput.1
2021 A Cryptographic Test of Quantumness and Certifiable Randomness from a Single Quantum Device
abstract
We consider a new model for the testing of untrusted quantum devices, consisting of a single polynomial time bounded quantum device interacting with a classical polynomial time verifier. In this model, we propose solutions to two tasks—a protocol for efficient classical verification that the untrusted device is “truly quantum” and a protocol for producing certifiable randomness from a single untrusted quantum device. Our solution relies on the existence of a new cryptographic primitive for constraining the power of an untrusted quantum device: post-quantum secure trapdoor claw-free functions that must satisfy an adaptive hardcore bit property. We show how to construct this primitive based on the hardness of the learning with errors (LWE) problem.
Zvika Brakerski, Paul F. Christiano, Urmila Mahadev, Umesh V. Vazirani, Thomas Vidick
J. ACM3
2018 A Cryptographic Test of Quantumness and Certifiable Randomness from a Single Quantum Device
abstract
We give a protocol for producing certifiable randomness from a single untrusted quantum device that is polynomial-time bounded. The randomness is certified to be statistically close to uniform from the point of view of any computationally unbounded quantum adversary, that may share entanglement with the quantum device. The protocol relies on the existence of post-quantum secure trapdoor claw-free functions, and introduces a new primitive for constraining the power of an untrusted quantum device. We then show how to construct this primitive based on the hardness of the learning with errors (LWE) problem. The randomness protocol can also be used as the basis for an efficiently verifiable "quantum supremacy" proposal, thus answering an outstanding challenge in the field.
Zvika Brakerski, Paul F. Christiano, Urmila Mahadev, Umesh V. Vazirani, Thomas Vidick
FOCS3
2018 Classical Verification of Quantum Computations
abstract
We present the first protocol allowing a classical computer to interactively verify the result of an efficient quantum computation. We achieve this by constructing a measurement protocol, which enables a classical verifier to use a quantum prover as a trusted measurement device. The protocol forces the prover to behave as follows: the prover must construct an n qubit state of his choice, measure each qubit in the Hadamard or standard basis as directed by the verifier, and report the measurement results to the verifier. The soundness of this protocol is enforced based on the assumption that the learning with errors problem is computationally intractable for efficient quantum machines.
Urmila Mahadev
FOCS1
2018 Classical Homomorphic Encryption for Quantum Circuits
abstract
We present the first leveled fully homomorphic encryption scheme for quantum circuits with classical keys. The scheme allows a classical client to blindly delegate a quantum computation to a quantum server: an honest server is able to run the computation while a malicious server is unable to learn any information about the computation. We show that it is possible to construct such a scheme directly from a quantum secure classical homomorphic encryption scheme with certain properties. Finally, we show that a classical homomorphic encryption scheme with the required properties can be constructed from the learning with errors problem.
Urmila Mahadev
FOCS1