Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kushal Ahmed

dblp:140/7498 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Requirements engineering and software design · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Logic in computer science · 50% Computational complexity · 50%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design
formal specification
0.212014
Formalisation of the integration of behavior trees · ASE 2014
Requirements engineering and software design
requirements modeling
0.212014
Formalisation of the integration of behavior trees · ASE 2014
Computational complexity
constraint satisfaction
0.112014
Formalisation of the integration of behavior trees · ASE 2014
Logic in computer science
process algebra
0.112014
Formalisation of the integration of behavior trees · ASE 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

semantic network model · 0.4communicating sequential processes · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Semantic Network Model: A Reasoning Engine for Software Requirements
abstract
In this paper, we present a semantic network model (SNM) as a reasoning engine for the requirements models. The SNM consists of the vertices and the edges, in which they store information of the models and their interrelations. The SNM, through a semi-automated normalisation process, helps the user (1) to assign states to the models and their relations as to whether they can be included, excluded, or undecided, (2) to eliminate redundant interrelations, (3) to avoid over-specification, and (4) to visualise a simplified overview of the whole system. Finally, we formulate the well-formedness of the SNM, which indicates whether the given models can produce a formal specification. We also evaluate our techniques using several case studies.
Kushal Ahmed, Lian Wen, Abdul Sattar 0001, Reza Farid
ICECCS1
2014 Formalisation of the integration of behavior trees
abstract
In this paper, we present a formal definition of the integration of the requirements modeling language Behavior Trees (BTs). We first provide the semantic integration of two interrelated BTs using an extended version of Communicating Sequential Processes. We then use a Semantic Network Model to capture a set of interrelated BTs, and develop algorithm to integrate them all into one BT. This formalisation facilitates developing (semi-)automated tools for modeling the requirements of large-scale software intensive systems.
Kushal Ahmed, M. A. Hakim Newton, Lian Wen, Abdul Sattar 0001
ASE1