Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Asaf Weinstein
dblp:140/7581
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Learning theory · 33% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 33% Trustworthy machine learning · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
false coverage rate control |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Online Control of the False Coverage Rate and False Sign Rate · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › hypothesis testing
multiple hypothesis testing |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Online Control of the False Coverage Rate and False Sign Rate · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Online Control of the False Coverage Rate and False Sign Rate · ICML 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
prediction intervals · 0.4confidence intervals · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Online Control of the False Coverage Rate and False Sign RateabstractThe reproducibility debate has caused a renewed interest in changing how one reports uncertainty, from $p$-value for testing a null hypothesis to a confidence interval (CI) for the corresponding parameter. When CIs for multiple selected parameters are being reported, the analog of the false discovery rate (FDR) is the false coverage rate (FCR), which is the expected ratio of number of reported CIs failing to cover their respective parameters to the total number of reported CIs. Here, we consider the general problem of FCR control in the online setting, where one encounters an infinite sequence of fixed unknown parameters ordered by time. We propose a novel solution to the problem which only requires the scientist to be able to construct marginal CIs. As special cases, our framework yields algorithms for online FDR control and online sign-classification procedures that control the false sign rate (FSR). All of our methodology applies equally well to prediction intervals, having particular implications for selective conformal inference. Asaf Weinstein, Aaditya Ramdas |
ICML | 1 |