Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Asaf Weinstein

dblp:140/7581 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Learning theory · 33% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 33% Trustworthy machine learning · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
false coverage rate control
0.412020
Online Control of the False Coverage Rate and False Sign Rate · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Learning theory › hypothesis testing
multiple hypothesis testing
0.412020
Online Control of the False Coverage Rate and False Sign Rate · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation
0.412020
Online Control of the False Coverage Rate and False Sign Rate · ICML 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

prediction intervals · 0.4confidence intervals · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Online Control of the False Coverage Rate and False Sign Rate
abstract
The reproducibility debate has caused a renewed interest in changing how one reports uncertainty, from $p$-value for testing a null hypothesis to a confidence interval (CI) for the corresponding parameter. When CIs for multiple selected parameters are being reported, the analog of the false discovery rate (FDR) is the false coverage rate (FCR), which is the expected ratio of number of reported CIs failing to cover their respective parameters to the total number of reported CIs. Here, we consider the general problem of FCR control in the online setting, where one encounters an infinite sequence of fixed unknown parameters ordered by time. We propose a novel solution to the problem which only requires the scientist to be able to construct marginal CIs. As special cases, our framework yields algorithms for online FDR control and online sign-classification procedures that control the false sign rate (FSR). All of our methodology applies equally well to prediction intervals, having particular implications for selective conformal inference.
Asaf Weinstein, Aaditya Ramdas
ICML1