EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
May Szedlák
dblp:140/7601
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 3Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 36% Algorithms and data structures · 25% Computational geometry · 19% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization › linear programming
LP-type problems |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Random Sampling with Removal · SoCG 2016 |
Algorithms and data structures
randomized algorithms |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Random Sampling with Removal · SoCG 2016 |
Algorithms and data structures › randomized algorithms
sampling |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Random Sampling with Removal · SoCG 2016 |
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization
sampling without replacement |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Random Sampling with Removal · SoCG 2016 |
Mathematical optimization
linear programming |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Combinatorial Redundancy Detection · SoCG 2015 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › spectral graph theory
cheeger inequality |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Higher Dimensional Cheeger Inequalities · SoCG 2014 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory
expansion properties |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Higher Dimensional Cheeger Inequalities · SoCG 2014 |
Computational geometry › topological data analysis
simplicial complexes |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Higher Dimensional Cheeger Inequalities · SoCG 2014 |
Computational geometry
topological data analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Higher Dimensional Cheeger Inequalities · SoCG 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
violator spaces · 0.2combinatorial bounds · 0.2output-sensitive algorithm · 0.2hyperplane arrangement · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Random Sampling with Removal
Kenneth L. Clarkson, Bernd Gärtner, Johannes Lengler, May Szedlák |
Discret. Comput. Geom. | 4 |
| 2017 | On the existence of ordinary triangles
Radoslav Fulek, Hossein Nassajian Mojarrad, Márton Naszódi, József Solymosi, Sebastian U. Stich, May Szedlák |
Comput. Geom. | 6 |
| 2016 | Random Sampling with RemovalabstractRandom sampling is a classical tool in constrained optimization. Under favorable conditions, the optimal solution subject to a small subset of randomly chosen constraints violates only a small subset of the remaining constraints. Here we study the following variant that we call random sampling with removal: suppose that after sampling the subset, we remove a fixed number of constraints from the sample, according to an arbitrary rule. Is it still true that the optimal solution of the reduced sample violates only a small subset of the constraints? The question naturally comes up in situations where the solution subject to the sampled constraints is used as an approximate solution to the original problem. In this case, it makes sense to improve cost and volatility of the sample solution by removing some of the constraints that appear most restricting. At the same time, the approximation quality (measured in terms of violated constraints) should remain high. We study random sampling with removal in a generalized, completely abstract setting where we assign to each subset R of the constraints an arbitrary set V(R) of constraints disjoint from R; in applications, V(R) corresponds to the constraints violated by the optimal solution subject to only the constraints in R. Furthermore, our results are parametrized by the dimension d, i.e., we assume that every set R has a subset B of size at most d with the same set of violated constraints. This is the first time this generalized setting is studied. In this setting, we prove matching upper and lower bounds for the expected number of constraints violated by a random sample, after the removal of k elements. For a large range of values of k, the new upper bounds improve the previously best bounds for LP-type problems, which moreover had only been known in special cases. We show that this bound on special LP-type problems, can be derived in the much more general setting of violator spaces, and with very elementary proofs. Bernd Gärtner, Johannes Lengler, May Szedlák |
SoCG | 3 |
| 2016 | The PPSZ Algorithm for Constraint Satisfaction Problems on More Than Two Colors
Timon Hertli, Isabelle Hurbain, Sebastian Millius, Robin A. Moser, Dominik Scheder, May Szedlák |
CP | 6 |
| 2015 | Combinatorial Redundancy DetectionabstractThe problem of detecting and removing redundant constraints is fundamental in optimization. We focus on the case of linear programs (LPs) in dictionary form, given by n equality constraints in n+d variables, where the variables are constrained to be nonnegative. A variable x_r is called redundant, if after removing its nonnegativity constraint the LP still has the same feasible region. The time needed to solve such an LP is denoted by LP(n,d). It is easy to see that solving n+d LPs of the above size is sufficient to detect all redundancies. The currently fastest practical method is the one by Clarkson: it solves n+d linear programs, but each of them has at most s variables, where s is the number of nonredundant constraints. In the first part we show that knowing all of the finitely many dictionaries of the LP is sufficient for the purpose of redundancy detection. A dictionary is a matrix that can be thought of as an enriched encoding of a vertex in the LP. Moreover - and this is the combinatorial aspect - it is enough to know only the signs of the entries, the actual values do not matter. Concretely we show that for any variable x_r one can find a dictionary, such that its sign pattern is either a redundancy or nonredundancy certificate for x_r. In the second part we show that considering only the sign patterns of the dictionary, there is an output sensitive algorithm of running time of order d (n+d) s^{d-1} LP(s,d) + d s^{d} LP(n,d) to detect all redundancies. In the case where all constraints are in general position, the running time is of order s LP(n,d) + (n+d) LP(s,d), which is essentially the running time of the Clarkson method. Our algorithm extends naturally to a more general setting of arrangements of oriented topological hyperplane arrangements. Komei Fukuda, Bernd Gärtner, May Szedlák |
SoCG | 3 |
| 2014 | Higher Dimensional Cheeger InequalitiesabstractFor graphs there exists a strong connection between spectral and combinatorial expansion properties. This is expressed, e.g., by the discrete Cheeger inequality, the lower bound of which states that λ(G) ≤ h(G), where λ(G) is the second smallest eigenvalue of the Laplacian of a graph G and h(G) is the Cheeger constant measuring the edge expansion of G. We are interested in generalizations of expansion properties to finite simplicial complexes of higher dimension (or uniform hypergraphs). Anna Gundert, May Szedlák |
SoCG | 2 |