Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Eun Jee Lee
dblp:140/7685
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 56% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 22% Distributed computing theory · 22% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
influence maximization |
0.7 | 2 | 2020 | Generalized Nonbacktracking Bounds on the Influence · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 Nonbacktracking Bounds on the Influence in Independent Cascade Models · NIPS 2017 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › network analysis › network diffusion
independent cascade model |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Nonbacktracking Bounds on the Influence in Independent Cascade Models · NIPS 2017 |
Distributed computing theory
message-passing algorithms |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Nonbacktracking Bounds on the Influence in Independent Cascade Models · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models |
0.2 | 2 | 2020 | Generalized Nonbacktracking Bounds on the Influence · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 Nonbacktracking Bounds on the Influence in Independent Cascade Models · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
independent cascade model |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Generalized Nonbacktracking Bounds on the Influence · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
message passing · 1.4FKG inequality · 0.9nonbacktracking walk · 0.6fortuin-kasteleyn-ginibre inequality · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Generalized Nonbacktracking Bounds on the InfluenceabstractThis paper develops deterministic upper and lower bounds on the influence measure in a network, more precisely, the expected number of nodes that a seed set can influence in the independent cascade model. In particular, our bounds exploit r-nonbacktracking walks and Fortuin-Kasteleyn-Ginibre (FKG) type inequalities, and are computed by message passing algorithms. Further, we provide parameterized versions of the bounds that control the trade-off between efficiency and accuracy. Finally, the tightness of the bounds is illustrated on various network models. Emmanuel Abbe, Sanjeev R. Kulkarni, Eun Jee Lee |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 3 |
| 2017 | Nonbacktracking Bounds on the Influence in Independent Cascade ModelsabstractThis paper develops upper and lower bounds on the influence measure in a network, more precisely, the expected number of nodes that a seed set can influence in the independent cascade model. In particular, our bounds exploit nonbacktracking walks, Fortuin-Kasteleyn-Ginibre type inequalities, and are computed by message passing algorithms. Nonbacktracking walks have recently allowed for headways in community detection, and this paper shows that their use can also impact the influence computation. Further, we provide parameterized versions of the bounds that control the trade-off between the efficiency and the accuracy. Finally, the tightness of the bounds is illustrated with simulations on various network models. Emmanuel Abbe, Sanjeev R. Kulkarni, Eun Jee Lee |
NIPS | 3 |
| 2013 | Outer bounds and a functional study of the edge removal problemabstractIn this paper, we investigate the impact of a single edge on the capacity region of a network of error-free, point-to-point links. A family of networks and edges is said to exhibit the “edge removal property” if for any network and edge in the family, removing a δ-capacity edge changes the capacity region by at most δ in each dimension. We derive a sufficient condition on network coding functions to guarantee that the edge removal property holds when the network is operated using functions satisfying the condition. Also, we extend the family of network capacity bounds for which it is known that removing a single edge of capacity δ changes the capacity bound by at most f(δ) in each dimension. Specifically, we show that removing a single δ-capacity edge changes the Generalized Network Sharing outer bound by at most δ in each dimension and the Linear Programming outer bound by at most a constant times δ in each dimension. Eun Jee Lee, Michael Langberg, Michelle Effros |
ITW | 1 |