Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ruihan Guo
dblp:141/7116
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
1as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 1 first-author · 6 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
4 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Generative modeling · 29% Motion planning and robot control · 25% Reinforcement learning · 19% |
Topics — the 19 heaviest of 21, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein design
peptide design |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Hotspot-Driven Peptide Design via Multi-Fragment Autoregressive Extension · ICLR 2025 Full-Atom Peptide Design based on Multi-modal Flow Matching · ICML 2024 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
motion planning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ME-PATS: Mutually Enhancing Search-Based Planner and Learning-Based Agent for Tractor-Trailer Systems · ICRA 2025 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ME-PATS: Mutually Enhancing Search-Based Planner and Learning-Based Agent for Tractor-Trailer Systems · ICRA 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein design |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Hotspot-Driven Peptide Design via Multi-Fragment Autoregressive Extension · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
flow matching |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Full-Atom Peptide Design based on Multi-modal Flow Matching · ICML 2024 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
geometric deep learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | FAFE: Immune Complex Modeling with Geodesic Distance Loss on Noisy Group Frames · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
loss function design |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | FAFE: Immune Complex Modeling with Geodesic Distance Loss on Noisy Group Frames · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › multimodal generation
multimodal generative model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Full-Atom Peptide Design based on Multi-modal Flow Matching · ICML 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular informatics › molecular modeling › molecular docking
antibody-antigen docking |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | FAFE: Immune Complex Modeling with Geodesic Distance Loss on Noisy Group Frames · ICML 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
computational structural biology |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Full-Atom Peptide Design based on Multi-modal Flow Matching · ICML 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure analysis › quaternary structure
protein complex modeling |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | FAFE: Immune Complex Modeling with Geodesic Distance Loss on Noisy Group Frames · ICML 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular property prediction › protein property prediction
protein mutation effect prediction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Enhancing Protein Mutation Effect Prediction through a Retrieval-Augmented Framework · NeurIPS 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein structure prediction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | FAFE: Immune Complex Modeling with Geodesic Distance Loss on Noisy Group Frames · ICML 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › structural bioinformatics
protein structure representation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Enhancing Protein Mutation Effect Prediction through a Retrieval-Augmented Framework · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reward design › reward shaping
reward redistribution |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Learning Long-Term Reward Redistribution via Randomized Return Decomposition · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reward design
reward shaping |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Learning Long-Term Reward Redistribution via Randomized Return Decomposition · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
autoregressive model |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Hotspot-Driven Peptide Design via Multi-Fragment Autoregressive Extension · ICLR 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
search-based planning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | ME-PATS: Mutually Enhancing Search-Based Planner and Learning-Based Agent for Tractor-Trailer Systems · ICRA 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › molecular generation
molecular structure generation |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Full-Atom Peptide Design based on Multi-modal Flow Matching · ICML 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
optimization · 1.7energy-based density model · 1.7dihedral angle estimation · 1.7autoregressive extension · 1.7vector fields on manifolds · 1.5flow matching · 1.5SE(3) manifold · 1.5search-based planning · 0.9reinforcement learning · 0.9obstacle-aware network · 0.9geodesic distance · 0.8frame aligned point error · 0.8fine-tuning · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Hotspot-Driven Peptide Design via Multi-Fragment Autoregressive ExtensionabstractPeptides, short chains of amino acids, interact with target proteins, making them a unique class of protein-based therapeutics for treating human diseases. Recently, deep generative models have shown great promise in peptide generation. However, several challenges remain in designing effective peptide binders. First, not all residues contribute equally to peptide-target interactions. Second, the generated peptides must adopt valid geometries due to the constraints of peptide bonds. Third, realistic tasks for peptide drug development are still lacking.
To address these challenges, we introduce PepHAR, a hot-spot-driven autoregressive generative model for designing peptides targeting specific proteins. Building on the observation that certain hot spot residues have higher interaction potentials, we first use an energy-based density model to fit and sample these key residues. Next, to ensure proper peptide geometry, we autoregressively extend peptide fragments by estimating dihedral angles between residue frames. Finally, we apply an optimization process to iteratively refine fragment assembly, ensuring correct peptide structures.
By combining hot spot sampling with fragment-based extension, our approach enables \textit{de novo} peptide design tailored to a target protein and allows the incorporation of key hot spot residues into peptide scaffolds. Extensive experiments, including peptide design and peptide scaffold generation, demonstrate the strong potential of PepHAR in computational peptide binder design. The source code will be available at https://github.com/Ced3-han/PepHAR. Jiahan Li, Shitong Luo, Chaoran Cheng, Jiaqi Guan, Ruihan Guo, Jianzhu Ma |
ICLR | 6 |
| 2025 | ME-PATS: Mutually Enhancing Search-Based Planner and Learning-Based Agent for Tractor-Trailer SystemsabstractPlanning a kinodynamically feasible path for a tractor-trailer vehicle is challenging for both search-based and learning-based methods due to the vehicle's unique kinematics and complex obstacles. These factors increase the likelihood of infeasible paths and exacerbate long-horizon issues. We introduce ME-PATS: a framework that mutually enhances the search-based planner and the learning-based agent for tractortrailer systems. The search-based planner provides successful trajectories to help the learning-based agent update its policy, while the agent improves the planner's efficiency through direct path simulation. Additionally, we propose two approaches to apply our framework to more challenging tasks: designing obstacle-aware networks to enhance the learning-based agents capabilities, and combining the planner's paths with the trained agent's simulated paths through multi-segment integration. Full details and results are available on our project website at https://github.com/FrankSinatral/TTsystems. Zhizhou Ren, Ruihan Guo, Yuan Zhou 0007, Zufeng Zhang |
ICRA | 3 |
| 2024 | Full-Atom Peptide Design based on Multi-modal Flow MatchingabstractPeptides, short chains of amino acid residues, play a vital role in numerous biological processes by interacting with other target molecules, offering substantial potential in drug discovery. In this work, we present *PepFlow*, the first multi-modal deep generative model grounded in the flow-matching framework for the design of full-atom peptides that target specific protein receptors. Drawing inspiration from the crucial roles of residue backbone orientations and side-chain dynamics in protein-peptide interactions, we characterize the peptide structure using rigid backbone frames within the $\mathrm{SE}(3)$ manifold and side-chain angles on high-dimensional tori. Furthermore, we represent discrete residue types in the peptide sequence as categorical distributions on the probability simplex. By learning the joint distributions of each modality using derived flows and vector fields on corresponding manifolds, our method excels in the fine-grained design of full-atom peptides. Harnessing the multi-modal paradigm, our approach adeptly tackles various tasks such as fix-backbone sequence design and side-chain packing through partial sampling. Through meticulously crafted experiments, we demonstrate that *PepFlow* exhibits superior performance in comprehensive benchmarks, highlighting its significant potential in computational peptide design and analysis. Jiahan Li, Chaoran Cheng, Zuofan Wu, Ruihan Guo, Shitong Luo, Zhizhou Ren, Jian Peng 0001, Jianzhu Ma |
ICML | 4 |
| 2024 | FAFE: Immune Complex Modeling with Geodesic Distance Loss on Noisy Group FramesabstractDespite the striking success of general protein folding models such as AlphaFold2 (AF2), the accurate computational modeling of antibody-antigen complexes remains a challenging task. In this paper, we first analyze AF2’s primary loss function, known as the Frame Aligned Point Error (FAPE), and raise a previously overlooked issue that FAPE tends to face gradient vanishing problem on high-rotational-error targets. To address this fundamental limitation, we propose a novel geodesic loss called Frame Aligned Frame Error (FAFE, denoted as F2E to distinguish from FAPE), which enables the model to better optimize both the rotational and translational errors between two frames. We then prove that F2E can be reformulated as a group-aware geodesic loss, which translates the optimization of the residue-to-residue error to optimizing group-to-group geodesic frame distance. By fine-tuning AF2 with our proposed new loss function, we attain a correct rate of 52.3% (DockQ $>$ 0.23) on an evaluation set and 43.8% correct rate on a subset with low homology, with improvement over AF2 by 182% and 100% respectively. Ruidong Wu, Ruihan Guo, Shitong Luo, Jiahan Li, Jianzhu Ma, Qiang Liu 0001, Yunan Luo, Jian Peng 0001 |
ICML | 2 |
| 2024 | Enhancing Protein Mutation Effect Prediction through a Retrieval-Augmented FrameworkabstractPredicting the effects of protein mutations is crucial for analyzing protein functions and understanding genetic diseases.
However, existing models struggle to effectively extract mutation-related local structure motifs from protein databases, which hinders their predictive accuracy and robustness. To tackle this problem, we design a novel retrieval-augmented framework for incorporating similar structure information in known protein structures. We create a vector database consisting of local structure motif embeddings from a pre-trained protein structure encoder, which allows for efficient retrieval of similar local structure motifs during mutation effect prediction.
Our findings demonstrate that leveraging this method results in the SOTA performance across multiple protein mutation prediction datasets, and offers a scalable solution for studying mutation effects. Ruihan Guo, Ruidong Wu, Zhizhou Ren, Jiahan Li, Shitong Luo, Zuofan Wu, Qiang Liu 0001, Jian Peng 0001, Jianzhu Ma |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2022 | Learning Long-Term Reward Redistribution via Randomized Return Decomposition
Zhizhou Ren, Ruihan Guo, Yuan Zhou 0007, Jian Peng 0001 |
ICLR | 2 |