EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jason Rute
dblp:141/9655
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-6247-1882ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 3 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Automated reasoning and model checking · 54% Approximation and online algorithms · 24% Computational complexity · 21% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Graph learning · 28% Representation and self-supervised learning · 28% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 22% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Automated reasoning and model checking › theorem proving
interactive theorem proving |
0.9 | 2 | 2024 | Graph2Tac: Online Representation Learning of Formal Math Concepts · ICML 2024 Proof Artifact Co-Training for Theorem Proving with Language Models · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Graph2Tac: Online Representation Learning of Formal Math Concepts · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
hierarchical representation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Graph2Tac: Online Representation Learning of Formal Math Concepts · ICML 2024 |
Approximation and online algorithms
online learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Graph2Tac: Online Representation Learning of Formal Math Concepts · ICML 2024 |
Automated reasoning and model checking
theorem proving |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Graph2Tac: Online Representation Learning of Formal Math Concepts · ICML 2024 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › automated reasoning
theorem proving |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Proof Artifact Co-Training for Theorem Proving with Language Models · ICLR 2022 |
Computational complexity
algorithmic randomness |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Schnorr randomness for noncomputable measures · Inf. Comput. 2018 |
Computational complexity
computability theory |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Schnorr randomness for noncomputable measures · Inf. Comput. 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
online learning · 1.5graph neural network · 1.5proof assistant · 1.1language model · 1.1co-training · 1.1k-nearest neighbors · 0.8k-nearest neighbor · 0.8measure theory · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Graph2Tac: Online Representation Learning of Formal Math ConceptsabstractIn proof assistants, the physical proximity between two formal mathematical concepts is a strong predictor of their mutual relevance. Furthermore, lemmas with close proximity regularly exhibit similar proof structures. We show that this locality property can be exploited through online learning techniques to obtain solving agents that far surpass offline learners when asked to prove theorems in an unseen mathematical setting. We extensively benchmark two such online solvers implemented in the Tactician platform for the Coq proof assistant: First, Tactician’s online $k$-nearest neighbor solver, which can learn from recent proofs, shows a $1.72\times$ improvement in theorems proved over an offline equivalent. Second, we introduce a graph neural network, Graph2Tac, with a novel approach to build hierarchical representations for new definitions. Graph2Tac’s online definition task realizes a $1.5\times$ improvement in theorems solved over an offline baseline. The $k$-NN and Graph2Tac solvers rely on orthogonal online data, making them highly complementary. Their combination improves $1.27\times$ over their individual performances. Both solvers outperform all other general purpose provers for Coq, including CoqHammer, Proverbot9001, and a transformer baseline by at least $1.48\times$ and are available for practical use by end-users. Lasse Blaauwbroek, Miroslav Olsák, Jason Rute, Fidel Ivan Schaposnik Massolo, Jelle Piepenbrock, Vasily Pestun |
ICML | 3 |
| 2022 | Proof Artifact Co-Training for Theorem Proving with Language Models
Jesse Michael Han, Jason Rute, Yuhuai Wu, Edward W. Ayers, Stanislas Polu |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2019 | Algorithmic Randomness and Fourier Analysis
Johanna N. Y. Franklin, Timothy H. McNicholl, Jason Rute |
Theory Comput. Syst. | 3 |
| 2018 | Schnorr randomness for noncomputable measures
Jason Rute |
Inf. Comput. | 1 |
| 2016 | When does randomness come from randomness?
Jason Rute |
Theor. Comput. Sci. | 1 |