Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mohammad Reza Keshtkaran

dblp:142/2463 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Representation and self-supervised learning · 50% Optimization for machine learning · 25% Deep learning architectures and training · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
hyperparameter optimization
0.412019
Enabling hyperparameter optimization in sequential autoencoders for spiking neural data · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › dynamical system representation
latent dynamics
0.412019
Enabling hyperparameter optimization in sequential autoencoders for spiking neural data · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
regularization
0.412019
Enabling hyperparameter optimization in sequential autoencoders for spiking neural data · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
sequential autoencoder
0.412019
Enabling hyperparameter optimization in sequential autoencoders for spiking neural data · NeurIPS 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sample validation · 0.4recurrent neural network · 0.4coordinated dropout · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Enabling hyperparameter optimization in sequential autoencoders for spiking neural data
abstract
Continuing advances in neural interfaces have enabled simultaneous monitoring of spiking activity from hundreds to thousands of neurons. To interpret these large-scale data, several methods have been proposed to infer latent dynamic structure from high-dimensional datasets. One recent line of work uses recurrent neural networks in a sequential autoencoder (SAE) framework to uncover dynamics. SAEs are an appealing option for modeling nonlinear dynamical systems, and enable a precise link between neural activity and behavior on a single-trial basis. However, the very large parameter count and complexity of SAEs relative to other models has caused concern that SAEs may only perform well on very large training sets. We hypothesized that with a method to systematically optimize hyperparameters (HPs), SAEs might perform well even in cases of limited training data. Such a breakthrough would greatly extend their applicability. However, we find that SAEs applied to spiking neural data are prone to a particular form of overfitting that cannot be detected using standard validation metrics, which prevents standard HP searches. We develop and test two potential solutions: an alternate validation method (“sample validation”) and a novel regularization method (“coordinated dropout”). These innovations prevent overfitting quite effectively, and allow us to test whether SAEs can achieve good performance on limited data through large-scale HP optimization. When applied to data from motor cortex recorded while monkeys made reaches in various directions, large-scale HP optimization allowed SAEs to better maintain performance for small dataset sizes. Our results should greatly extend the applicability of SAEs in extracting latent dynamics from sparse, multidimensional data, such as neural population spiking activity.
Mohammad Reza Keshtkaran, Chethan Pandarinath
NeurIPS1