We study when partial Boolean functions can (and cannot) exhibit superpolynomial quantum query speedups, and develop a general framework for ruling out such speedups via two complementary lenses: promise-aware complexity measures and function completions. First, we introduce promise versions of standard combinatorial measures (including block sensitivity and related variants) and prove that if the relevant promise and completion measures "collapse", then deterministic and quantum query complexities are necessarily polynomially related, i.e., D(f) = poly(Q(f)). We then analyze structured families of promises, including symmetric partial functions and promises supported on Hamming slices, obtaining sharp (up to polynomial factors) characterizations in terms of a single gap parameter for the symmetric case and refined slice-dependent bounds for k-slice domains. Next, we formalize completion complexity as the minimum of a measure over total completions of a partial function, and show that completability of a measure captures the possibility of superpolynomial quantum speedups. Finally, we apply this viewpoint to derive broad non-speedup criteria for some classes of functions admitting well-behaved completions, such as functions with low maximum influence on both the standard and p-biased hypercubes and functions with efficiently identifiable domains, and then show some hardness results for general completion techniques.

We study the power of quantum witnesses under perfect completeness. We construct a classical oracle relative to which a language lies in QMA₁ but not in QCMA when the QCMA verifier is only allowed polynomially many adaptive rounds and exponentially many parallel queries per round. Additionally, we derandomize the permutation-oracle separation of Fefferman and Kimmel, obtaining an in-place oracle separation between QMA₁ and QCMA. Furthermore, we focus on QCMA and QMA with an exponentially small gap, where we show a separation assuming the gap is fixed, but not when it may be arbitrarily small. Finally, we derive consequences for approximate ground-state preparation from sparse Hamiltonian oracle access, including a bounded adaptivity frustration-free variant.

Aaronson, Bouland, Fitzsimons and Lee introduced the complexity class PDQP (which was original labeled naCQP), an alteration of BQP enhanced with the ability to obtain non-collapsing measurements, samples of quantum states without collapsing them. Although PDQP contains SZK, it still requires $Ω(N^{1/4})$ queries to solve unstructured search. We formulate an alternative equivalent definition of PDQP, which we use to prove the positive weighted adversary lower-bounding method, establishing multiple tighter bounds and a trade-off between queries and non-collapsing measurements. We utilize the technique in order to analyze the query complexity of the well-studied majority and element distinctness problems. Additionally, we prove a tight $Θ(N^{1/3})$ bound on search. Furthermore, we use the lower-bound to explore PDQP under query restrictions, finding that when combined with non-adaptive queries, we limit the speed-up in several cases.

Watrous conjectured that the randomized and quantum query complexities of symmetric functions are polynomially equivalent, which was resolved by Aaronson & Ambainis (2014) and was later improved by Chailloux (2019) and Ben-David et al. (2020). This paper explores a fine-grained version of the Watrous conjecture, including the randomized and quantum algorithms with success probabilities arbitrarily close to $$1/2$$ 1 / 2 . Our contributions include the following: 1. We analyze the optimal success probabilities of quantum and randomized query algorithms of two fundamental partial symmetric Boolean functions given a fixed number of queries. 2. We establish that for any total symmetric Boolean function $$f$$ f , if a quantum algorithm uses $$T$$ T queries to compute $$f$$ f with success probability $$1/2+\beta$$ 1 / 2 + β , then there exists a randomized algorithm using $$O(T^2)$$ O ( T 2 ) queries to compute $$f$$ f with success probability $$1/2+\Omega{\delta\beta^2}$$ 1 / 2 + Ω δ β 2 on a $$1-\delta$$ 1 - δ fraction of inputs, where $$\beta,\delta$$ β , δ can be arbitrarily small positive values. Moreover, we prove a randomized version of Aaronson-Ambainis Conjecture (Aaronson & Ambainis 2014) for symmetric Boolean functions in the regime where the success probability of algorithms can be arbitrarily close to 1/2. 3. We present tight polynomial equivalence for several fundamental complexity measures of partial symmetric Boolean functions.

Abstract. Aaronson and Ambainis [ Theory Comput., 10 (2014), pp. 133–166] and Chailloux [ Proceedings of the 10 th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference, 2018, pp. 19:1–19:7] showed that fully symmetric (partial) functions do not admit exponential quantum query speedups. This raises a natural question: how symmetric must a function be before it cannot exhibit a large quantum speedup? In this work, we prove that hypergraph symmetries in the adjacency matrix model allow at most a polynomial separation between randomized and quantum query complexities. We also show that, remarkably, permutation groups constructed out of these symmetries are essentially the only permutation groups that prevent superpolynomial quantum speedups. We prove this by fully characterizing the primitive permutation groups that allow superpolynomial quantum speedups. In contrast, in the adjacency list model for bounded-degree graphs—where graph symmetry is manifested differently—we exhibit a property testing problem that shows an exponential quantum speedup. These results resolve open questions posed by Ambainis, Childs, and Liu [ Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci. 6845, Springer, 2011, pp. 365–376] and Montanaro and de Wolf [ Theory Comput., 7 (2016)].

We study the communication complexity of computing functions $F:\{0,1\}^n\times \{0,1\}^n \rightarrow \{0,1\}$ in the memoryless communication model. Here, Alice is given $x\in \{0,1\}^n$, Bob is given $y\in \{0,1\}^n$ and their goal is to compute F(x,y) subject to the following constraint: at every round, Alice receives a message from Bob and her reply to Bob solely depends on the message received and her input x; the same applies to Bob. The cost of computing F in this model is the maximum number of bits exchanged in any round between Alice and Bob (on the worst case input x,y). In this paper, we also consider variants of our memoryless model wherein one party is allowed to have memory, the parties are allowed to communicate quantum bits, only one player is allowed to send messages. We show that our memoryless communication model capture the garden-hose model of computation by Buhrman et al. (ITCS'13), space bounded communication complexity by Brody et al. (ITCS'13) and the overlay communication complexity by Papakonstantinou et al. (CCC'14). Thus the memoryless communication complexity model provides a unified framework to study space-bounded communication models. We establish the following: (1) We show that the memoryless communication complexity of F equals the logarithm of the size of the smallest bipartite branching program computing F (up to a factor 2); (2) We show that memoryless communication complexity equals garden-hose complexity; (3) We exhibit various exponential separations between these memoryless communication models. We end with an intriguing open question: can we find an explicit function F and universal constant c>1 for which the memoryless communication complexity is at least $c \log n$? Note that $c\geq 2+\varepsilon$ would imply a $Ω(n^{2+\varepsilon})$ lower bound for general formula size, improving upon the best lower bound by Nečiporuk in 1966.

Aaronson and Ambainis (2009) and Chailloux (2018) showed that fully symmetric (partial) functions do not admit exponential quantum query speedups. This raises a natural question: how symmetric must a function be before it cannot exhibit a large quantum speedup? In this work, we prove that hypergraph symmetries in the adjacency matrix model allow at most a polynomial separation between randomized and quantum query complexities. We also show that, remarkably, permutation groups constructed out of these symmetries are essentially the only permutation groups that prevent super-polynomial quantum speedups. We prove this by fully characterizing the primitive permutation groups that allow super-polynomial quantum speedups. In contrast, in the adjacency list model for bounded-degree graphs-where graph symmetry is manifested differently-we exhibit a property testing problem that shows an exponential quantum speedup. These results resolve open questions posed by Ambainis, Childs, and Liu (2010) and Montanaro and de Wolf (2013).

The query complexity of graph properties is well-studied when queries are on edges. We investigate the same when queries are on nodes. In this setting a graph $G = (V, E)$ on $n$ vertices and a property $\mathcal{P}$ are given. A black-box access to an unknown subset $S \subseteq V$ is provided via queries of the form `Does $i \in S$?'. We are interested in the minimum number of queries needed in worst case in order to determine whether $G[S]$, the subgraph of $G$ induced on $S$, satisfies $\mathcal{P}$. Apart from being combinatorially rich, this setting allows us to initiate a systematic study of breaking symmetry in the context of query complexity of graph properties. In particular, we focus on hereditary graph properties. The monotone functions in the node-query setting translate precisely to the hereditary graph properties. The famous Evasiveness Conjecture asserts that even with a minimal symmetry assumption on $G$, namely that of vertex-transitivity, the query complexity for any hereditary graph property in our setting is the worst possible, i.e., $n$. We show that in the absence of any symmetry on $G$ it can fall as low as $O(n^{1/(d + 1) })$ where $d$ denotes the minimum possible degree of a minimal forbidden sub-graph for $\mathcal{P}$. In particular, every hereditary property benefits at least quadratically. The main question left open is: can it go exponentially low for some hereditary property? We show that the answer is no for any hereditary property with {finitely many} forbidden subgraphs by exhibiting a bound of $Ω(n^{1/k})$ for some constant $k$ depending only on the property. For general ones we rule out the possibility of the query complexity falling down to constant by showing $Ω(\log n/ \log \log n)$ bound. Interestingly, our lower bound proofs rely on the famous Sunflower Lemma due to Erdös and Rado.

Let H be a (non-empty) graph on n vertices, possibly containing isolated vertices. Let f_H(G) = 1 iff the input graph G on n vertices contains H as a (not necessarily induced) subgraph. Let alpha_H denote the cardinality of a maximum independent set of H. In this paper we show: Q(f_H) = Omega( sqrt{alpha_H * n}), where Q(f_H) denotes the quantum query complexity of f_H. As a consequence we obtain lower bounds for Q(f_H) in terms of several other parameters of H such as the average degree, minimum vertex cover, chromatic number, and the critical probability. We also use the above bound to show that Q(f_H) = Omega(n^{3/4}) for any H, improving on the previously best known bound of Omega(n^{2/3}) [M. Santha/A. Chi-Chih Yao, unpublished manuscript]. Until very recently, it was believed that the quantum query complexity is at least square root of the randomized one. Our Omega(n^{3/4}) bound for Q(f_H) matches the square root of the current best known bound for the randomized query complexity of f_H, which is Omega(n^{3/2}) due to Groger. Interestingly, the randomized bound of Omega(alpha_H * n) for f_H still remains open. We also study the Subgraph Homomorphism Problem, denoted by f_{[H]}, and show that Q(f_{[H]}) = Omega(n). Finally we extend our results to the 3-uniform hypergraphs. In particular, we show an Omega(n^{4/5}) bound for quantum query complexity of the Subgraph Isomorphism, improving on the previously known Omega(n^{3/4}) bound. For the Subgraph Homomorphism, we obtain an Omega(n^{3/2}) bound for the same.

We show new results about the garden-hose model. Our main results include improved lower bounds based on non-deterministic communication complexity (leading to the previously unknown $Θ(n)$ bounds for Inner Product mod 2 and Disjointness), as well as an $O(n\cdot \log^3 n)$ upper bound for the Distributed Majority function (previously conjectured to have quadratic complexity). We show an efficient simulation of formulae made of AND, OR, XOR gates in the garden-hose model, which implies that lower bounds on the garden-hose complexity $GH(f)$ of the order $Ω(n^{2+ε})$ will be hard to obtain for explicit functions. Furthermore we study a time-bounded variant of the model, in which even modest savings in time can lead to exponential lower bounds on the size of garden-hose protocols.