Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Cody Littley

dblp:142/3140 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Computer networks · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 87% Storage systems · 13%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 50% Collaborative and social computing · 50%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Transaction processing and concurrency control · 77% Database system architecture and tuning · 23%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed systems › consistency models
causal consistency
0.312017
I Can't Believe It's Not Causal! Scalable Causal Consistency with No Slowdown Cascades · NSDI 2017
Distributed systems
replication
0.312017
I Can't Believe It's Not Causal! Scalable Causal Consistency with No Slowdown Cascades · NSDI 2017
Transaction processing and concurrency control
ACID transactions
0.212015
High-performance ACID via modular concurrency control · SOSP 2015
Collaborative and social computing › interpersonal communication
common ground
0.212014
Collaborative effort towards common ground in situated human-robot dialogue · HRI 2014
Human-robot interaction › robot communication
situated dialogue
0.212014
Collaborative effort towards common ground in situated human-robot dialogue · HRI 2014
Storage systems › distributed storage
geo-distributed storage
0.112017
I Can't Believe It's Not Causal! Scalable Causal Consistency with No Slowdown Cascades · NSDI 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

modular concurrency control · 0.2group-specific concurrency control · 0.2natural language processing · 0.2empirical study · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 I Can't Believe It's Not Causal! Scalable Causal Consistency with No Slowdown Cascades
Syed Akbar Mehdi, Cody Littley, Natacha Crooks, Lorenzo Alvisi, Nathan Bronson, Wyatt Lloyd
NSDI2
2015 High-performance ACID via modular concurrency control
abstract
This paper describes the design, implementation, and evaluation of Callas, a distributed database system that offers to unmodified, transactional ACID applications the opportunity to achieve a level of performance that can currently only be reached by rewriting all or part of the application in a BASE/NoSQL Style. The key to combining performance and ease of programming is to decouple the ACID abstraction---which Callas offers identically for all transactions---from the mechanism used to support it. MCC, the new Modular approach to Concurrency Control at the core of Callas, makes it possible to partition transactions in groups with the guarantee that, as long as the concurrency control mechanism within each group upholds a given isolation property, that property will also hold among transactions in different groups. Because of their limited and specialized scope, these group-specific mechanisms can be customized for concurrency with unprecedented aggressiveness. In our MySQL Cluster-based prototype, Callas yields an 8.2x throughput gain for TPC-C with no programming effort.
Chunzhi Su, Cody Littley, Lorenzo Alvisi, Manos Kapritsos, Yang Wang 0009
SOSP3
2014 Collaborative effort towards common ground in situated human-robot dialogue
abstract
In situated human-robot dialogue, although humans and robots are co-present in a shared environment, they have significantly mismatched capabilities in perceiving the shared environment. Their representations of the shared world are misaligned. In order for humans and robots to communicate with each other successfully using language, it is important for them to mediate such differences and to establish common ground. To address this issue, this paper describes a dialogue system that aims to mediate a shared perceptual basis during human-robot dialogue. In particular, we present an empirical study that examines the role of the robot's collaborative effort and the performance of natural language processing modules in dialogue grounding. Our empirical results indicate that in situated human-robot dialogue, a low collaborative effort from the robot may lead its human partner to believe a common ground is established. However, such beliefs may not reflect true mutual understanding. To support truly grounded dialogues, the robot should make an extra effort by making its partner aware of its internal representation of the shared world.
Joyce Y. Chai, Lanbo She, Spencer Ottarson, Cody Littley, Changsong Liu, Kenneth Hanson
HRI5