Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Aleksandr Diment
dblp:142/4133
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers |
Audio and music processing · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Audio and music processing
sound event detection |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Sound Event Detection in the DCASE 2017 Challenge · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2019 |
Audio and music processing › source separation
moving source separation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Separation of Moving Sound Sources Using Multichannel NMF and Acoustic Tracking · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2018 |
Audio and music processing › source separation › blind source separation
multichannel nonnegative matrix factorization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Separation of Moving Sound Sources Using Multichannel NMF and Acoustic Tracking · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2018 |
Audio and music processing
source separation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Separation of Moving Sound Sources Using Multichannel NMF and Acoustic Tracking · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2018 |
Audio and music processing › audio classification
acoustic scene classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Sound Event Detection in the DCASE 2017 Challenge · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2019 |
Audio and music processing › audio classification
audio tagging |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Sound Event Detection in the DCASE 2017 Challenge · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
jackknife resampling · 0.4deep neural network · 0.4confidence interval · 0.4wiener filtering · 0.3spatial covariance matrix · 0.3acoustic tracking · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Detection of Typical Pronunciation Errors in Non-native English Speech Using Convolutional Recurrent Neural NetworksabstractA machine learning method for the automatic detection of pronunciation errors made by non-native speakers of English is proposed. It consists of training word-specific binary classifiers on a collected dataset of isolated words with possible pronunciation errors, typical for Finnish native speakers. The classifiers predict whether the typical error is present in the given word utterance. They operate on sequences of acoustic features, extracted from consecutive frames of an audio recording of a word utterance. The proposed architecture includes a convolutional neural network, a recurrent neural network, or a combination of the two. The optimal topology and hyperparameters are obtained in a Bayesian optimisation setting using a tree-structured Parzen estimator. A dataset of 80 words uttered naturally by 120 speakers is collected. The performance of the proposed system, evaluated on a well-represented subset of the dataset, shows that it is capable of detecting pronunciation errors in most of the words (46/49) with high accuracy (mean accuracy gain over the zero rule 12.21 percent points). Aleksandr Diment, Eemi Fagerlund, Adrian Benfield, Tuomas Virtanen |
IJCNN | 1 |
| 2019 | Sound Event Detection in the DCASE 2017 ChallengeabstractEach edition of the challenge on Detection and Classification of Acoustic Scenes and Events (DCASE) contained several tasks involving sound event detection in different setups. DCASE 2017 presented participants with three such tasks, each having specific datasets and detection requirements: Task 2, in which target sound events were very rare in both training and testing data, Task 3 having overlapping events annotated in real-life audio, and Task 4, in which only weakly labeled data were available for training. In this paper, we present three tasks, including the datasets and baseline systems, and analyze the challenge entries for each task. We observe the popularity of methods using deep neural networks, and the still widely used mel frequency-based representations, with only few approaches standing out as radically different. Analysis of the systems behavior reveals that task-specific optimization has a big role in producing good performance; however, often this optimization closely follows the ranking metric, and its maximization/minimization does not result in universally good performance. We also introduce the calculation of confidence intervals based on a jackknife resampling procedure to perform statistical analysis of the challenge results. The analysis indicates that while the 95% confidence intervals for many systems overlap, there are significant differences in performance between the top systems and the baseline for all tasks. Annamaria Mesaros, Aleksandr Diment, Benjamin Elizalde, Toni Heittola, Emmanuel Vincent 0001, Bhiksha Raj, Tuomas Virtanen |
IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. | 2 |
| 2018 | Separation of Moving Sound Sources Using Multichannel NMF and Acoustic TrackingabstractIn this paper, we propose a method for separation of moving sound sources. The method is based on first tracking the sources and then estimation of source spectrograms using multichannel nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) and extracting the sources from the mixture by single-channel Wiener filtering. We propose a novel multichannel NMF model with time-varying mixing of the sources denoted by spatial covariance matrices (SCM) and provide update equations for optimizing model parameters minimizing squared Frobenius norm. The SCMs of the model are obtained based on estimated directions of arrival of tracked sources at each time frame. The evaluation is based on established objective separation criteria and using real recordings of two and three simultaneous moving sound sources. The compared methods include conventional beamforming and ideal ratio mask separation. The proposed method is shown to exceed the separation quality of other evaluated blind approaches according to all measured quantities. Additionally, we evaluate the method's susceptibility toward tracking errors by comparing the separation quality achieved using annotated ground truth source trajectories. Joonas Nikunen, Aleksandr Diment, Tuomas Virtanen |
IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. | 2 |
| 2017 | A convolutional neural network approach for acoustic scene classificationabstractThis paper presents a novel application of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for the task of acoustic scene classification (ASC). We here propose the use of a CNN trained to classify short sequences of audio, represented by their log-mel spectrogram. We also introduce a training method that can be used under particular circumstances in order to make full use of small datasets. The proposed system is tested and evaluated on three different ASC datasets and compared to other state-of-the-art systems which competed in the “Detection and Classification of Acoustic Scenes and Events” (DCASE) challenges held in 20161and 2013. The best accuracy scores obtained by our system on the DCASE 2016 datasets are 79.0% (development) and 86.2% (evaluation), which constitute a 6.4% and 9% improvements with respect to the baseline system. Finally, when tested on the DCASE 2013 evaluation dataset, the proposed system manages to reach a 77.0% accuracy, improving by 1% the challenge winner's score. Michele Valenti, Stefano Squartini, Aleksandr Diment, Giambattista Parascandolo, Tuomas Virtanen |
IJCNN | 3 |
| 2016 | Binaural rendering of microphone array captures based on source separation
Joonas Nikunen, Aleksandr Diment, Tuomas Virtanen, Miikka Vilermo |
Speech Commun. | 2 |