Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Todd Wasson
dblp:142/5067
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene regulation |
0.4 | 2 | 2014 | Learning protein-DNA interaction landscapes by integrating experimental data through computational models · Bioinform. 2014 Learning Protein-DNA Interaction Landscapes by Integrating Experimental Data through Computational Models · RECOMB 2014 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein function prediction › protein classification
DNA-binding protein prediction |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Learning Protein-DNA Interaction Landscapes by Integrating Experimental Data through Computational Models · RECOMB 2014 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein analysis › protein bioinformatics
protein-DNA interaction |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Learning protein-DNA interaction landscapes by integrating experimental data through computational models · Bioinform. 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
statistical inference · 0.2MCMC · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | Learning Protein-DNA Interaction Landscapes by Integrating Experimental Data through Computational Models
Jianling Zhong, Todd Wasson, Alexander J. Hartemink |
RECOMB | 2 |
| 2014 | Learning protein-DNA interaction landscapes by integrating experimental data through computational modelsabstractMOTIVATION: Transcriptional regulation is directly enacted by the interactions between DNA and many proteins, including transcription factors (TFs), nucleosomes and polymerases. A critical step in deciphering transcriptional regulation is to infer, and eventually predict, the precise locations of these interactions, along with their strength and frequency. While recent datasets yield great insight into these interactions, individual data sources often provide only partial information regarding one aspect of the complete interaction landscape. For example, chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) reveals the binding positions of a protein, but only for one protein at a time. In contrast, nucleases like MNase and DNase can be used to reveal binding positions for many different proteins at once, but cannot easily determine the identities of those proteins. Currently, few statistical frameworks jointly model these different data sources to reveal an accurate, holistic view of the in vivo protein-DNA interaction landscape. RESULTS: Here, we develop a novel statistical framework that integrates different sources of experimental information within a thermodynamic model of competitive binding to jointly learn a holistic view of the in vivo protein-DNA interaction landscape. We show that our framework learns an interaction landscape with increased accuracy, explaining multiple sets of data in accordance with thermodynamic principles of competitive DNA binding. The resulting model of genomic occupancy provides a precise mechanistic vantage point from which to explore the role of protein-DNA interactions in transcriptional regulation. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The C source code for compete and Python source code for MCMC-based inference are available at http://www.cs.duke.edu/∼amink. CONTACT: [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Jianling Zhong, Todd Wasson, Alexander J. Hartemink |
Bioinform. | 2 |