Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jana Noskova
dblp:142/5723
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-4927-4489ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
3D vision · 80% Learning theory · 20% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers |
Computational photography and imaging · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational photography and imaging
camera geometry |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | MAGSAC++, a Fast, Reliable and Accurate Robust Estimator · CVPR 2020 MAGSAC: Marginalizing Sample Consensus · CVPR 2019 |
Computational photography and imaging › camera geometry
homography estimation |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | MAGSAC++, a Fast, Reliable and Accurate Robust Estimator · CVPR 2020 MAGSAC: Marginalizing Sample Consensus · CVPR 2019 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › geometric estimation
geometric model fitting |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Marginalizing Sample Consensus · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2022 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › multi-view geometry
homography estimation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Marginalizing Sample Consensus · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation › robust statistics
m-estimation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Marginalizing Sample Consensus · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2022 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › camera pose estimation
relative pose estimation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Marginalizing Sample Consensus · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2022 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
robust estimation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Marginalizing Sample Consensus · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2022 |
Computational photography and imaging › camera geometry
fundamental matrix estimation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | MAGSAC++, a Fast, Reliable and Accurate Robust Estimator · CVPR 2020 |
Computational photography and imaging › camera geometry
epipolar geometry estimation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | MAGSAC: Marginalizing Sample Consensus · CVPR 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
iteratively reweighted least squares · 1.0marginalization · 1.0m-estimation · 0.8robust kernel · 0.6Progressive NAPSAC · 0.4weighted least squares · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Pose-graph via Adaptive Image Re-ordering
Daniel Barath, Jana Noskova, Ivan Eichhardt, Jiri Matas |
BMVC | 2 |
| 2022 | Marginalizing Sample ConsensusabstractA new method for robust estimation, MAGSAC++, is proposed. It introduces a new model quality (scoring) function that does not make inlier-outlier decisions, and a novel marginalization procedure formulated as an M-estimation with a novel class of M-estimators (a robust kernel) solved by an iteratively re-weighted least squares procedure. Instead of the inlier-outlier threshold, it requires only its loose upper bound which can be chosen from a significantly wider range. Also, we propose a new termination criterion and a technique for selecting a set of inliers in a data-driven manner as a post-processing step after the robust estimation finishes. On a number of publicly available real-world datasets for homography, fundamental matrix fitting and relative pose, MAGSAC++ produces results superior to the state-of-the-art robust methods. It is more geometrically accurate, fails fewer times, and it is often faster. It is shown that MAGSAC++ is significantly less sensitive to the setting of the threshold upper bound than the other state-of-the-art algorithms to the inlier-outlier threshold. Therefore, it is easier to be applied to unseen problems and scenes without acquiring information by hand about the setting of the inlier-outlier threshold. The source code and examples both in C++ and Python are available at https://github.com/danini/magsac. Daniel Barath, Jana Noskova, Jiri Matas |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 2 |
| 2020 | MAGSAC++, a Fast, Reliable and Accurate Robust EstimatorabstractA new method for robust estimation, MAGSAC++1, is proposed. It introduces a new model quality (scoring) function that does not require the inlier-outlier decision, and a novel marginalization procedure formulated as an M-estimation with a novel class of M-estimators (a robust kernel) solved by an iteratively re-weighted least squares procedure. We also propose a new sampler, Progressive NAPSAC, for RANSAC-like robust estimators. Exploiting the fact that nearby points often originate from the same model in real-world data, it finds local structures earlier than global samplers. The progressive transition from local to global sampling does not suffer from the weaknesses of purely localized samplers. On six publicly available realworld datasets for homography and fundamental matrix fitting, MAGSAC++ produces results superior to the state-of-the-art robust methods. It is faster, more geometrically accurate and fails less often. Daniel Barath, Jana Noskova, Maksym Ivashechkin, Jiri Matas |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2019 | MAGSAC: Marginalizing Sample ConsensusabstractA method called, sigma-consensus, is proposed to eliminate the need for a user-defined inlier-outlier threshold in RANSAC. Instead of estimating the noise sigma, it is marginalized over a range of noise scales. The optimized model is obtained by weighted least-squares fitting where the weights come from the marginalization over sigma of the point likelihoods of being inliers. A new quality function is proposed not requiring sigma and, thus, a set of inliers to determine the model quality. Also, a new termination criterion for RANSAC is built on the proposed marginalization approach. Applying sigma-consensus, MAGSAC is proposed with no need for a user-defined sigma and improving the accuracy of robust estimation significantly. It is superior to the state-of-the-art in terms of geometric accuracy on publicly available real-world datasets for epipolar geometry (F and E) and homography estimation. In addition, applying sigma-consensus only once as a post-processing step to the RANSAC output always improved the model quality on a wide range of vision problems without noticeable deterioration in processing time, adding a few milliseconds. Daniel Barath, Jiri Matas, Jana Noskova |
CVPR | 3 |
| 2016 | Online adaptive hidden Markov model for multi-tracker fusion
Tomás Vojír, Jiri Matas, Jana Noskova |
Comput. Vis. Image Underst. | 3 |
| 2014 | Robust scale-adaptive mean-shift for tracking
Tomás Vojír, Jana Noskova, Jiri Matas |
Pattern Recognit. Lett. | 2 |