Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Fazal Wahab
dblp:142/9698
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
0as first author
8since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Graph learning · 62% Representation and self-supervised learning · 38% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
2.0 | 2 | 2026 | Hierarchical Graph-Bag-Network for Self-Supervised Multi-Graph Learning · WWW 2026 Self-Supervised Contrastive Re-Learning for Multi-Graph Multi-Label Classification · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
multi-graph learning |
2.0 | 2 | 2026 | Hierarchical Graph-Bag-Network for Self-Supervised Multi-Graph Learning · WWW 2026 Self-Supervised Contrastive Re-Learning for Multi-Graph Multi-Label Classification · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph classification |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Self-Supervised Contrastive Re-Learning for Multi-Graph Multi-Label Classification · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Hierarchical Graph-Bag-Network for Self-Supervised Multi-Graph Learning · WWW 2026 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › contrastive learning
hierarchical contrastive learning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Hierarchical Graph-Bag-Network for Self-Supervised Multi-Graph Learning · WWW 2026 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › multi-scale graph neural network
hierarchical graph neural network |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Hierarchical Graph-Bag-Network for Self-Supervised Multi-Graph Learning · WWW 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
prototype alignment · 1.0multi-granularity contrastive loss · 1.0data augmentation · 1.0contrastive re-learning · 1.0contrastive learning · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Self-Supervised Contrastive Re-Learning for Multi-Graph Multi-Label ClassificationabstractMulti-graph multi-label learning (MGML) represents each object as a bag-of-graphs with multiple labels, but demands large-scale labeled data whose acquisition is often difficult and costly. Self-supervised contrastive learning (SCL) mitigates label dependence by leveraging data augmentation to construct discriminative pretext tasks, proving effective for multi-instance learning. However, when applied to MGML, SCL faces two key challenges: (1) it distinguishes individual instances by their differences, whereas MGML requires modeling label correlations; (2) it assumes semantic invariance under augmentation, but structural perturbations in MGML alter label semantics. To tackle these challenges, we propose a self-suPervised contrastive rE-learning framework for mulTi-grAph multi-labeL classification (PETAL). Specifically, to model label correlations, we first define a unified label space to learn label prototypes and align features with them, yielding prototype-aligned representations. We then design a multi-granularity contrastive loss over these representations, which captures label dependencies by contrasting at the bag level, graph level, and bag-graph level. Moreover, to ensure semantic invariance, we develop a contrastive re-learning strategy based on prototype-aligned representations to generate augmentation-free positive samples. This guarantees consistent multi-label distributions without structural perturbations. Experiments on six datasets demonstrate that PETAL achieves an average improvement of 4.12% over state-of-the-art self-supervised and supervised baselines. Meixia Wang, Yuhai Zhao, Zhengkui Wang, Yejiang Wang, Miaomiao Huang, Fenglong Ma, Fazal Wahab, Wen Shan, Xingwei Wang 0001 |
AAAI | 7 |
| 2026 | Hierarchical Graph-Bag-Network for Self-Supervised Multi-Graph LearningabstractMulti-Graph Learning (MGL) is a fundamental machine learning paradigm that represents objects as bags-of-graphs, each encoding a distinct structural property, and has broad applications in bioinformatics, chemistry, computing power networks, and software defect detection. However, the inherent scarcity of labeled data poses a significant bottleneck for supervised MGL approaches. While self-supervised contrastive learning offers a compelling solution, its direct application to MGL faces three key challenges: (1) existing graph neural networks, primarily for single-graph modeling, struggle to yield discriminative bag-level representations from bags-of-graphs; (2) conventional contrastive objectives are limited to single-level settings, failing to capture cross-hierarchical dependencies; and (3) standard data augmentation often disrupts intrinsic graph and bag structures, undermining semantic consistency. To address these issues, we propose the Hierarchical Graph-Bag-Network (HGBN), a self-supervised MGL framework that constructs hierarchical representations in the form of a graph-bag-network. HGBN employs an asymmetric hierarchical graph neural network to learn discriminative graph-level and bag-level representations, introduces cross-hierarchical contrastive objectives to align graph-level and bag-level semantics, and leverages the asymmetric network outputs to form positive and negative pairs, preserving intrinsic structural and semantic consistency. Experiments on eight benchmark multi-graph datasets demonstrate that HGBN consistently outperforms both supervised and self-supervised state-of-the-art baselines, achieving average improvements of 4.82% in accuracy and F1 score. Meixia Wang, Yuhai Zhao, Zhengkui Wang, Fenglong Ma, Yejiang Wang, Miaomiao Huang, Fazal Wahab, Wen Shan, Xingwei Wang 0001 |
WWW | 7 |
| 2026 | A CNN-transformer framework with GAN augmentation for human activity recognition in wearable sensors
Mujeeb Ullah Jan, Anwar Shah, Fazal Wahab, Riyan Athar |
Multim. Tools Appl. | 5 |
| 2025 | I/O efficient core maintenance in large graphs
Yuan Li 0008, Fazal Wahab, Yuhai Zhao |
Expert Syst. Appl. | 4 |
| 2024 | Multi-graph learning-based software defect locationabstractAbstract Software quality is key to the success of software systems. Modern software systems are growing in their worth based on industry needs and becoming more complex, which inevitably increases the possibility of more defects in software systems. Software repairing is time‐consuming, especially locating the source files related to specific software defect reports. To locate defective source files more quickly and accurately, automated software defect location technology is generated and has a huge application value. The existing deep learning‐based software defect location method focuses on extracting the semantic correlation between the source file and the corresponding defect reports. However, the extensive code structure information contained in the source files is ignored. To this end, we propose a software defect location method, namely, multi‐graph learning‐based software defect location (MGSDL). By extracting the program dependency graphs for functions, each source file is converted into a graph bag containing multiple graphs (i.e., multi‐graph). Further, a multi‐graph learning method is proposed, which learns code structure information from multi‐graph to establish the semantic association between source files and software defect reports. Experiments' results on four publicly available datasets, AspectJ, Tomcat, Eclipse UI, and SWT, show that MGSDL improves on average 3.88%, 5.66%, 13.23%, 9.47%, and 3.26% over the competitive methods in five evaluation metrics, rank@10, rank@5, MRR, MAP, and AUC, respectively. Ying Yin 0001, Yucen Shi, Yuhai Zhao, Fazal Wahab |
J. Softw. Evol. Process. | 4 |
| 2023 | Multi-graph multi-label learning with novel and missing labels
Miaomiao Huang, Yuhai Zhao, Yejiang Wang, Fazal Wahab |
Knowl. Based Syst. | 4 |
| 2023 | Global triangle estimation based on first edge sampling in large graph streams
Changyong Yu, Fazal Wahab, Zihan Ling, Tianmei Ren, Yuhai Zhao |
J. Supercomput. | 3 |
| 2022 | The most active community search in large temporal graphs
Yuhai Zhao, Yuan Li 0008, Fazal Wahab, Zhengkui Wang |
Knowl. Based Syst. | 4 |