Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jifan Chen

dblp:143/0527 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
11ranked-venue papers
6as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 6 first-author · 5 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
7 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 60% Language models and text generation · 32% Deep learning architectures and training · 5%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › discourse analysis
discourse relation recognition
0.932019
Implicit discourse relation detection using concatenated word embeddings and a gated relevance network · Sci. China Inf. Sci. 2019
Implicit Discourse Relation Detection via a Deep Architecture with Gated Relevance Network · ACL (1) 2016
Discourse Relations Detection via a Mixed Generative-Discriminative Framework · AAAI 2016
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
alignment
0.812024
Dancing in Chains: Reconciling Instruction Following and Faithfulness in Language Models · EMNLP 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
instruction tuning
0.812024
Dancing in Chains: Reconciling Instruction Following and Faithfulness in Language Models · EMNLP 2024
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › discourse analysis › discourse relation recognition
implicit discourse relation recognition
0.622019
Implicit discourse relation detection using concatenated word embeddings and a gated relevance network · Sci. China Inf. Sci. 2019
Implicit Discourse Relation Detection via a Deep Architecture with Gated Relevance Network · ACL (1) 2016
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
claim decomposition
0.612022
Generating Literal and Implied Subquestions to Fact-check Complex Claims · EMNLP 2022
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
fact-checking
0.612022
Generating Literal and Implied Subquestions to Fact-check Complex Claims · EMNLP 2022
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
discourse analysis
0.212016
Discourse Relations Detection via a Mixed Generative-Discriminative Framework · AAAI 2016
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recurrent neural network
0.212016
Modelling Interaction of Sentence Pair with Coupled-LSTMs · EMNLP 2016
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
text matching
0.212016
Deep Fusion LSTMs for Text Semantic Matching · ACL (1) 2016
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › word representation
word embedding
0.222019
Implicit discourse relation detection using concatenated word embeddings and a gated relevance network · Sci. China Inf. Sci. 2019
Discourse Relations Detection via a Mixed Generative-Discriminative Framework · AAAI 2016
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › natural language understanding
sentence pair modeling
0.122016
Modelling Interaction of Sentence Pair with Coupled-LSTMs · EMNLP 2016
Deep Fusion LSTMs for Text Semantic Matching · ACL (1) 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

self-instruction tuning · 0.8rejection sampling · 0.8multi-task learning · 0.8gated relevance network · 0.6pre-trained language model · 0.6concatenated word embeddings · 0.4weighted fisher vector · 0.2pooling · 0.2generative-discriminative framework · 0.2fisher kernel · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 CiteEval: Principle-Driven Citation Evaluation for Source Attribution
abstract
Yumo Xu, Peng Qi, Jifan Chen, Kunlun Liu, Rujun Han, Lan Liu, Bonan Min, Vittorio Castelli, Arshit Gupta, Zhiguo Wang. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025.
Yumo Xu, Peng Qi 0003, Jifan Chen, Kunlun Liu, Rujun Han, Lan Liu 0004, Bonan Min, Vittorio Castelli, Arshit Gupta, Zhiguo Wang 0006
ACL (1)3
2024 Dancing in Chains: Reconciling Instruction Following and Faithfulness in Language Models
abstract
Modern language models (LMs) need to follow human instructions while being faithful; yet, they often fail to achieve both.Here, we provide concrete evidence of a trade-off between instruction following (i.e., follow open-ended instructions) and faithfulness (i.e., ground responses in given context) when training LMs with these objectives.For instance, fine-tuning LLaMA-7B on instruction following datasets renders it less faithful.Conversely, instructiontuned Vicuna-7B shows degraded performance at following instructions when further optimized on tasks that require contextual grounding.One common remedy is multi-task learning (MTL) with data mixing, yet it remains far from achieving a synergic outcome.We propose a simple yet effective method that relies on Rejection Sampling for Continued Selfinstruction Tuning (RESET), which significantly outperforms vanilla MTL.Surprisingly, we find that less is more, as training RESET with high-quality, yet substantially smaller data (three-fold less) yields superior results.Our findings offer a better understanding of objective discrepancies in alignment training of LMs.
Zhengxuan Wu, Yuhao Zhang 0004, Peng Qi 0003, Yumo Xu, Rujun Han, Yian Zhang, Jifan Chen, Bonan Min, Zhiheng Huang
EMNLP7
2024 Complex Claim Verification with Evidence Retrieved in the Wild
abstract
Jifan Chen, Grace Kim, Aniruddh Sriram, Greg Durrett, Eunsol Choi. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024.
Jifan Chen, Grace Kim, Aniruddh Sriram, Greg Durrett, Eunsol Choi
NAACL-HLT1
2022 Generating Literal and Implied Subquestions to Fact-check Complex Claims
abstract
Verifying political claims is a challenging task, as politicians can use various tactics to subtly misrepresent the facts for their agenda.Existing automatic fact-checking systems fall short here, and their predictions like "half-true" are not very useful in isolation, since it is unclear which parts of a claim are true or false.In this work, we focus on decomposing a complex claim into a comprehensive set of yes-no subquestions whose answers influence the veracity of the claim.We present CLAIMDECOMP, a dataset of decompositions for over 1000 claims.Given a claim and its verification paragraph written by fact-checkers, our trained annotators write subquestions covering both explicit propositions of the original claim and its implicit facets, such as additional political context that changes our view of the claim's veracity.We study whether state-of-the-art pre-trained models can learn to generate such subquestions.Our experiments show that these models generate reasonable questions, but predicting implied subquestions based only on the claim (without consulting other evidence) remains challenging.Nevertheless, we show that predicted subquestions can help identify relevant evidence to fact-check the full claim and derive the veracity through their answers, suggesting that claim decomposition can be a useful piece of a fact-checking pipeline.1 1 We release our code and dataset: https://jifan-chen. github.io/ClaimDecompJoe Biden stated on August 31, 2020 in a speech: "When I was vice president, violent crime fell 15% in this country.... The murder rate now is up 26% across the nation this year under Donald Trump."Claim Decomposi-on: focus of this work Claim Q1: Did the crime rate fall by 15% during Joe Biden's presidency?Q2: Did the murder rate in 2020 increase by 26% from 2019?Q3: Is Biden comparing crime rates from the same time interval in his statement?Q4: Is violent crime rate and murder rate directly comparable?Literal Implied
Jifan Chen, Aniruddh Sriram, Eunsol Choi, Greg Durrett
EMNLP1
2021 Robust Question Answering Through Sub-part Alignment
abstract
Current textual question answering (QA) models achieve strong performance on in-domain test sets, but often do so by fitting surfacelevel patterns, so they fail to generalize to outof-distribution settings.To make a more robust and understandable QA system, we model question answering as an alignment problem.We decompose both the question and context into smaller units based on off-the-shelf semantic representations (here, semantic roles), and align the question to a subgraph of the context in order to find the answer.We formulate our model as a structured SVM, with alignment scores computed via BERT, and we can train end-to-end despite using beam search for approximate inference.Our use of explicit alignments allows us to explore a set of constraints with which we can prohibit certain types of bad model behavior arising in cross-domain settings.Furthermore, by investigating differences in scores across different potential answers, we can seek to understand what particular aspects of the input lead the model to choose the answer without relying on post-hoc explanation techniques.We train our model on SQuAD v1.1 and test it on several adversarial and out-of-domain datasets.The results show that our model is more robust than the standard BERT QA model, and constraints derived from alignment scores allow us to effectively trade off coverage and accuracy.
Jifan Chen, Greg Durrett
NAACL-HLT1
2019 Implicit discourse relation detection using concatenated word embeddings and a gated relevance network
Jinlan Fu, Qi Zhang 0001, Jifan Chen, Minlong Peng, Tao Gui, Xipeng Qiu, Xuanjing Huang 0001
Sci. China Inf. Sci.3
2016 Discourse Relations Detection via a Mixed Generative-Discriminative Framework
abstract
Word embeddings, which can better capture the fine-grained semantics of words, have proven to be useful for a variety of natural language processing tasks. However, because discourse structures describe the relationships between segments of discourse, word embeddings cannot be directly integrated to perform the task. In this paper, we introduce a mixed generative-discriminative framework, in which we use vector offsets between embeddings of words to represent the semantic relations between text segments and Fisher kernel framework to convert a variable number of vector offsets into a fixed length vector. In order to incorporate the weights of these offsets into the vector, we also propose the Weighted Fisher Vector. Experimental results on two different datasets show that the proposed method without using manually designed features can achieve better performance on recognizing the discourse level relations in most cases.
Jifan Chen, Qi Zhang 0001, Pengfei Liu 0003, Xuanjing Huang 0001
AAAI1
2016 Implicit Discourse Relation Detection via a Deep Architecture with Gated Relevance Network
abstract
Word pairs, which are one of the most easily accessible features between two text segments, have been proven to be very useful for detecting the discourse relations held between text segments.However, because of the data sparsity problem, the performance achieved by using word pair features is limited.In this paper, in order to overcome the data sparsity problem, we propose the use of word embeddings to replace the original words.Moreover, we adopt a gated relevance network to capture the semantic interaction between word pairs, and then aggregate those semantic interactions using a pooling layer to select the most informative interactions.Experimental results on Penn Discourse Tree Bank show that the proposed method without using manually designed features can achieve better performance on recognizing the discourse level relations in all of the relations.
Jifan Chen, Qi Zhang 0001, Pengfei Liu 0003, Xipeng Qiu, Xuanjing Huang 0001
ACL (1)1
2016 Deep Fusion LSTMs for Text Semantic Matching
abstract
Recently, there is rising interest in modelling the interactions of text pair with deep neural networks.In this paper, we propose a model of deep fusion LSTMs (DF-LSTMs) to model the strong interaction of text pair in a recursive matching way.Specifically, DF-LSTMs consist of two interdependent LSTMs, each of which models a sequence under the influence of another.We also use external memory to increase the capacity of LSTMs, thereby possibly capturing more complicated matching patterns.Experiments on two very large datasets demonstrate the efficacy of our proposed architecture.Furthermore, we present an elaborate qualitative analysis of our models, giving an intuitive understanding how our model worked.
Pengfei Liu 0003, Xipeng Qiu, Jifan Chen, Xuanjing Huang 0001
ACL (1)3
2016 Incorporate Group Information to Enhance Network Embedding
abstract
The problem of representing large-scale networks with low-dimensional vectors has received considerable attention in recent years. Except the networks that include only vertices and edges, a variety of networks contain information about groups or communities. For example, on Facebook, in addition to users and the follower-followee relations between them, users can also create and join groups. However, previous studies have rarely utilized this valuable information to generate embeddings of vertices. In this paper, we investigate a novel method for learning the network embeddings with valuable group information for large-scale networks. The proposed methods take both the inner structures of the groups and the information across groups into consideration. Experimental results demonstrate that the embeddings generated by the proposed methods significantly outperform state-of-the-art network embedding methods on two different scale real-world network
Jifan Chen, Qi Zhang 0001, Xuanjing Huang 0001
CIKM1
2016 Modelling Interaction of Sentence Pair with Coupled-LSTMs
abstract
Recently, there is rising interest in modelling the interactions of two sentences with deep neural networks.However, most of the existing methods encode two sequences with separate encoders, in which a sentence is encoded with little or no information from the other sentence.In this paper, we propose a deep architecture to model the strong interaction of sentence pair with two coupled-LSTMs.Specifically, we introduce two coupled ways to model the interdependences of two LSTMs, coupling the local contextualized interactions of two sentences.We then aggregate these interactions and use a dynamic pooling to select the most informative features.Experiments on two very large datasets demonstrate the efficacy of our proposed architectures.
Pengfei Liu 0003, Xipeng Qiu, Yaqian Zhou 0001, Jifan Chen, Xuanjing Huang 0001
EMNLP4