Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Fadi Hamad
dblp:143/4911
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization
convergence analysis |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | A consistently adaptive trust-region method · NeurIPS 2022 |
Mathematical optimization › convergence analysis
iteration complexity |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | A consistently adaptive trust-region method · NeurIPS 2022 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
nonlinear optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | A consistently adaptive trust-region method · NeurIPS 2022 |
Mathematical optimization › numerical computation › numerical optimization › second-order methods
trust region methods |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | A consistently adaptive trust-region method · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
lipschitz constant estimation · 0.6adaptive trust-region · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | A consistently adaptive trust-region methodabstractAdaptive trust-region methods attempt to maintain strong convergence guarantees without depending on conservative estimates of problem properties such as Lipschitz constants. However, on close inspection, one can show existing adaptive trust-region methods have theoretical guarantees with severely suboptimal dependence on problem properties such as the Lipschitz constant of the Hessian. For example, TRACE developed by Curtis et al. obtains a $O(\Delta_f L^{3/2} \epsilon^{-3/2}) + \tilde{O}(1)$ iteration bound where $L$ is the Lipschitz constant of the Hessian. Compared with the optimal $O(\Delta_f L^{1/2} \epsilon^{-3/2})$ bound this is suboptimal with respect to $L$. We present the first adaptive trust-region method which circumvents this issue and requires at most $O( \Delta_f L^{1/2} \epsilon^{-3/2}) + \tilde{O}(1)$ iterations to find an $\epsilon$-approximate stationary point, matching the optimal iteration bound up to an additive logarithmic term. Our method is a simple variant of a classic trust-region method and in our experiments performs competitively with both ARC and a classical trust-region method. Fadi Hamad, Oliver Hinder |
NeurIPS | 1 |