Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kyle Lady

dblp:143/5669 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Network measurement and analytics · 44% Internet architecture and protocols · 44% Network management and operations · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Network measurement and analytics › internet measurement
internet background radiation
0.212013
Understanding IPv6 internet background radiation · Internet Measurement Conference 2013
Internet architecture and protocols
IPv6
0.212013
Understanding IPv6 internet background radiation · Internet Measurement Conference 2013
Network management and operations › configuration verification
misconfiguration detection
0.012013
Understanding IPv6 internet background radiation · Internet Measurement Conference 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

network telescope · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Understanding IPv6 internet background radiation
abstract
We report the results of a study to collect and analyze IPv6 Internet background radiation. This study, the largest of its kind, collects unclaimed traffic on the IPv6 Internet by announcing five large covering prefixes; these cover the majority of allocated IPv6 space on today's Internet. Our analysis characterizes the nature of this traffic across regions, over time, and by the allocation and routing status of the intended destinations, which we show help to identify the causes of this traffic. We compare results to unclaimed traffic in IPv4, and highlight case studies that explain a large fraction of the data or highlight notable properties. We describe how announced covering prefixes differ from traditional network telescopes, and show how this technique can help both network operators and the research community identify additional potential issues and misconfigurations in this critical Internet transition period.
Jakub Czyz, Kyle Lady, Sam G. Miller, Michael D. Bailey, Michael G. Kallitsis, Manish Karir
Internet Measurement Conference2